377
378

A controversial bill that abolishes "personal belief exemptions" for vaccinations won overwhelming approval in the California Senate on Thursday, bolstering supporters' hopes that it will also clear the Assembly and be signed into law. (mercurynews.com)

NinjaDiscoJesus が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順q&a
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]SoCo_cpp -15 ポイント-14 ポイント  (20子コメント)

That is one hell of a slippery slope. The first in a long line of more and more controversial government mandated medications.

[–]kevin_at_work 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (14子コメント)

Not mandated. Just a pre-requisite for attending public school.

[–]tallerthanunicorngod 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

You have no idea what you're talking about. The Supreme Court ruled literally over a century ago that the government could fine or jail people who refused vaccination, this doesn't even go that far.

The legal question was settled before you were even fucking born, your ignorance of the law does not mean every law you dislike it a slippery slope into more laws you don't like.

[–]SoCo_cpp -3 ポイント-2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You apparently don't understand what a slippery slope is. Take your butt hurt and go on. Pretty soon it will be illegal not to take your mood pills and your government mandated birth control.

[–]Beastender_Tartine 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Comment's like this are so basically fallacious that one of the major fallacies is named after it. It's called the slippery slope fallacy.

[–]GnomeB -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

slippery slope fallacy.

there's also a whole lot of false equivalency going on in this thread.

[–]SoCo_cpp -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

That is funny, you use a logical fallacy to manipulate a very reasonable concern of slippery slope pertaining to government regulations on non-critical medical treatments, calling it a fallacy its self. You are a funny guy.

The slippery slope fallacy falsely believes one thing must lead to another. It is not defined by being concerned about potential slippery slopes.