782
783

Promote ideas, protect people (redditblog.com)

kn0thing[A] が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順q&a
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]robotortoise 114 ポイント115 ポイント  (54子コメント)

It's not the worst offender anymore.

/r/bestof and /r/subredditdrama are. Both use NP links, but the mods and NP links can only do so much...

[–]duckvimes_ 36 ポイント37 ポイント  (46子コメント)

/r/subredditdrama's mods will ban anyone they catch voting or commenting in a linked thread, though.

[–]NoMoreNicksLeft 62 ポイント63 ポイント  (25子コメント)

That's bullshit. I've been brigaded by SRD at least 5 times in the last couple months, and the latest was some jackoff who couldn't win the argument and took it to SRD so they could be his own personal army.

I had +10 and +20 comments in the original thread that then tanked to -20, and the person who posted it to SRD was a commenter in the original thread. He provably commented.

I'm sure they claim to do that sort of banning, so they can have some plausible deniability, but if they did it for real their subreddit would be empty.

[–]iamaneviltaco 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Interesting, because they have a rule there specifically stating that you can't post drama you're involved with.

[–]ManFromAnAntiqueLand 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I had someone post to SRD on a post they were involved in and it was upvoted and nobody said a word.

[–]cameroncac 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

No its true, Im banned for that reason. (Sorry I made a few comments. I deleted em now)

[–]duckvimes_ 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (9子コメント)

I'm sure they claim to do that sort of banning, so they can have some plausible deniability, but if they did it for real their subreddit would be empty.

Bullshit. When I was new to SRD, I commented in a linked thread because I thought that was okay. I was banned from SRD quickly.

They can't do anything about votes other than report it to the admins.

[–]TAKEitTOrCIRCLEJERK -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm sure they claim to do that sort of banning, so they can have some plausible deniability, but if they did it for real their subreddit would be empty.

man, our banlist is fuckin' epic

[–]zaxotone 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Did he post before or after the link?

[–]obvious_bot -3 ポイント-2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think it's impossible for mods to know who voted. Only admins can do that. The mods are good at banning people who obviously follow the link then comment though

[–]redditors_are_racist -5 ポイント-4 ポイント  (3子コメント)

That might be because you have terrible opinions

[–]NoMoreNicksLeft 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

"Terrible opinions" just means they don't agree with yours. So yes, exactly.

[–]redditors_are_racist -5 ポイント-4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I mean objectively, your opinions are pure trash and you would be ostracized and shamed irl for them

[–]Captain_Balko 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

What an unintelligent thing to say.

I mean objectively, your opinions are pure trash

How does one measure the, ah, "trashiness" of an opinion objectively? By what system would one use? Because last I checked, it's impossible to "objectively" label an opinion trash. What you mean to say is that they don't align with yours, and therefore they must be garbage because you're so amazing.

and you would be ostracized and shamed irl for them

First of all, what opinions are you even talking about? Secondly, what a vague and ridiculous statement. Assuming you're talking about racist opinions (I mean, your name is "redditors are racist"), are you sure that no matter where this person lives they'd be shamed and ostracized for sharing their opinion? Your heavily American-centric viewpoint and bias is showing.

[–]MillenniumFalc0n 28 ポイント29 ポイント  (3子コメント)

We do that, but unfortunately it doesn't prevent people from continuing to subscribe and invade if they so choose. Also we can only ban people for commenting, suspicious vote activity has to be forwarded to the admins.

[–]duckvimes_ 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's all about the intentions, really. The mods work against brigading, so a sub ban would be unfair. Whereas with PCMR (a while ago) and /r/n***ers, the mods ignited or actively encouraged it.

[–]Gudeldar 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

They can't see voting though.

[–]duckvimes_ -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well, no. But if for whatever reason they know you voted, they'd ban you.

[–]DJ_HoCake 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

How does that work if you are subscribed and have been an active user within that sub prior to the SRD link?

[–]duckvimes_ -3 ポイント-2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's an art and not a science, to be sure. But if the linked thread is a few days old and you comment there right after it's linked in SRD, you'll definitely get banned.

[–]moush 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

And how do they know someone was lead there from srd and not organically?

[–]duckvimes_ -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

If the rest of the linked thread is a few days old, but your comment is very recent and came after the SRD post, it's logical to assume that you came from SRD. Similarly, if you comment in SRD and then comment on the linked thread, you probably came from SRD.

[–]robotortoise 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Yeah, and they do a great job of it.

Still makes me wish for an official NP tool, though.

[–]duckvimes_ 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if they have one of the largest ban lists on Reddit.

[–]PlayMp1 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

I expect them and /r/AskHistorians have a pretty ridiculous ban list (for non-spam users).

[–]duckvimes_ -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

/r/askscience, too. I'm assuming SRS has the largest.

[–]macinneb -4 ポイント-3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Seriously. SRS gets brigaded constantly, can only imagine the ban list.

[–]willfe42 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I love it when they taste their own poison.

[–]alien122 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (3子コメント)

well they can't catch voting, and commenting isn't really against site rules. Just srd's rules.

[–]duckvimes_ -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I think commenting would fall under brigading. I might be wrong though.

[–]alien122 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

it really depends. If it's an individual, not much will happen. If the entire subreddit does it, then the ban hammer comes out.

[–]TAKEitTOrCIRCLEJERK -3 ポイント-2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

commenting isn't really against site rules. Just srd's rules.

if you make a habit of it, you'll get spongebob'd too. seen it happen many times

[–]hatessw 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

'Vote brigading' in that sense isn't even against reddit rules. You can share links with likeminded people who may be more likely to vote in line with your own votes. Similarly, 'np.reddit.com' is not a reddit feature at all. It is a hack that has seen no technical support from reddit inc. as far as I can tell.

You're just not allowed to ask for votes or use multiple accounts to vote redundantly.

Also, the first paragraph does not mean voting rings are allowed - the act of agreement of voting a certain way is also disallowed.

[–]willfe42 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Oh ye gods yes. SRD especially love to churn out righteous brigades in the name of their own twisted brand of "justice."

[–]robotortoise -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Um, no they don't. Rule 4 is "Do not vote or comment in threads you've found through SRD" "This is a bannable offense"

SRD does everything it can to prevent brigades.

[–]willfe42 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Ah, I see. Well, there's a rule for it and everything! Guess that's all settled! Surely no one ever ignores it.

[–]robotortoise 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Did...did you seriously downvote me?

....Fuck this, I'm not talking with someone who ignores reddiquette.

[–]TotesMessenger 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

This thread has been linked to from another place on reddit.

If you follow any of the above links, respect the rules of reddit and don't vote. (Info / Contact)

[–]Chavril 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

it's the same individuals