use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
詳しくは検索FAQを参照
高度な検索: 投稿者や、subredditで……
1,600 現在のここのユーザー
Items from redditblog.com that are about the community or otherwise not directly related to functionality changes will be posted here.
See also:
List of reddit video interviews
Promote ideas, protect people (redditblog.com)
kn0thing[A] が 4 時間 前 投稿
残りのコメントをみる →
[–]kn0thing[S,A] -19 ポイント-18 ポイント-17 ポイント 4 時間 前* (28子コメント)
Steve and I created reddit to be a platform that would connect people across the world through authentic conversations, collaboration, and community (the alliteration was not intended, but ended up being a nice touch). You’ve told us that harassment is a huge problem -- we're not happy with it either -- so we’re doing something about it. It's a process, but please help us continue to strive to get reddit to live up to the ideals it was created with; we can't do it alone.
Edit: I forgot to mention, the privacy policy update for revenge porn continues to be really well received by redditors and traffic has only continued to grow since then, so we're hopeful this is another step in the right direction.
[–]courtiebabe420 42 ポイント43 ポイント44 ポイント 4 時間 前 (3子コメント)
authentic conversations
Then we need to rethink the policy on astroturfing that we've been discussing the last few days, I would think.
[–]cahaseler 33 ポイント34 ポイント35 ポイント 4 時間 前 (2子コメント)
Yea, being told by an admin that:
What I mean by this is: “astroturfing” (in this case being having alts used to ask questions on your own AMA or show support for the OP) does not break reddit rules.
doesn't seem to fit with this vision of authentic conversations at all.
[–]Mikecom32 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント 4 時間 前 (0子コメント)
Yeah, I'd probably say it directly contradicts that idea, honestly.
[–]j0be 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 3 時間 前 (0子コメント)
Which admin said that?
[–]XPythagoras 22 ポイント23 ポイント24 ポイント 4 時間 前 (11子コメント)
Harassment is present in all internet platforms. One could say that a down vote is harassment. Sure, there are subs that the majority of us don't agree with, but who are we to silence them?
[+]kn0thing[S] スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント 3 時間 前 (10子コメント)
One could say that a down vote is harassment.
No, actually, from the post, harassment is defined as:
Systematic and/or continued actions to torment or demean someone in a way that would make a reasonable person (1) conclude that reddit is not a safe platform to express their ideas or participate in the conversation, or (2) fear for their safety or the safety of those around them.
[–]Soundwavetrue 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント 3 時間 前* (0子コメント)
ive been harassed by srs before You gonna take em off? There is a high amount of brigading by the sub but its obvious you dont take subs like best of or SRS down. They are built for brigading at their core and yet you wont take them down. Because they give gold?
[–][deleted] 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント 3 時間 前 (5子コメント)
Sounds like how the majority of Reddit users view ShitRedditSays. Will they finally be removed under these rules?
[–]lenaro -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 1 時間 前 (4子コメント)
Which person is being systematically tormented by SRS?
[–][deleted] 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 時間 前 (3子コメント)
Is there anything SRS does other than demean posters?
[–]lenaro -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 1 時間 前 (2子コメント)
I'm confused. Why do you find it demeaning to be called out by SRS? Either they're wrong about what they're calling you out for and therefore you should be proud of being called out, or they're right and you're actually a shitty person. Since you've already been banned by reddit at least once, I'm going to go with "actually a shitty person".
[–][deleted] -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 57 分 前 (1子コメント)
I was banned for "multiple accounts." Which as I stated was bogus, as I've never had more than one account at a time. But nice try. You've also failed to answer the question.
[–]lenaro 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 55 分 前* (0子コメント)
You've also failed to answer the question.
That is a fascinating thing to say when you completely ignored my original question, which was: "Which person is being systematically tormented by SRS?" I was hoping you were going to show me a specific person who has been "systematically tormented". Otherwise, why else would you make the claim that SRS is systematically tormenting someone?
Edit: Lol, way to get another of your accounts banned, dumbass.
[–]lamaksha77 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント 3 時間 前 (0子コメント)
I'm pretty sure millions of Muslims or Christians or Jews would find /r/atheism irrationally fear-inducing and blasphemous. Does this mean its going to get the ban-hammer? Or would that be only if the advertisers start complaining about it?
[–]AvatarOfMomus 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 35 分 前 (0子コメント)
Clarification question here. That definition of Harassment is a fairly common one, and for an individual on individual basis it holds up fairly well. Where I think it breaks down is on a community vs individual basis, because a group of individuals can each send one message without any sort of collaboration or intent to harass and yet the sum of the parts adds up to an individual feeling harassed.
So my question is does this policy cover instances where one person is the subject of, essentially, mob harassment, and in those cases how do the mods plan to take action with no individual to ban?
[–]too_clever_username -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 25 分 前 (0子コメント)
... make a reasonable person 1) conclude that reddit is not a safe platform to express their ideas or participate in the conversation
There are no reasonable people on reddit.
You saw the twitter management talking about harassment claims -- most of the "harassment" claims were actually "people disagreeing with me".
A certain kind of personality can identify so strongy with their ideology that criticism of their ideas becomes criticism of them, which is, from their point of view, harassment.
1) How are you going to deal with harassment claims that are people crying harassment when it's obviously simply disagreement?
2) Who will this apply to? Just reddit accounts, and is this just about harassment over PMs, or anyone? So if someone gets their tumblr linked to because of something stupid they said, then cries harassment, does /r/TumblrInAction need to worry about being banned because of that?
[–]quraid 16 ポイント17 ポイント18 ポイント 4 時間 前 (0子コメント)
You’ve told us that harassment is a huge problem
No we haven't. Some of us may have, and some of us prefer the freedom of an open internet. and with the freedom comes both good and bad speech.
[–]Idontknowmuch 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 3 時間 前 (2子コメント)
What about having an option to have real authenticated users, where users who want to engage in authentic conversations, collaborations and community, or in other words, which is what old reddit was anyway, can be truly authenticated?
Somehow an account gets authenticated against the person behind it, without exposing information to the site and other redditors. I don't know how this can be done, but surely there must be a way, without human interaction.
Then a user can have the option to block responses from un-authenticated users, if desired so. Something like a more die-hard "dont show below x threshold" option.
I know this is not an answer to the problem, but it is an interesting thing to look into for people who want to weed out unwanted stuff which potentially includes harassers, etc.
Also this gives new opportunities for new stuff to be done, for example, a place to do pledges, or voting within reddit. Going off topic now, but if you want to continue please read below.
I know this is a long shot but, looking at the Armenian Genocide issue, it looked like there was a lack of "visibility" of important people putting their weight behind the issue. I had an idea of how we could have a system where academics, or "vip" people (borrowing from r/IAMA) could sign on recognizing the event, and how this could be a valid proof of people whose opinion matters being behind a cause. Note that this is not simply a change.org idea, but something more. And anyway this whole thing seems to be a neat idea for people who would like to be authenticated to have a more "mature" community.
[–]the_federalist 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 時間 前 (1子コメント)
"Papers please?"
[–]Idontknowmuch 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 時間 前 (0子コメント)
Completely optional. Anyway we do have Auto-authentication such as flairs in r/science and of course the IAMAs, why not embrace it even more and of course completely optional.
[–]russlar 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 3 時間 前 (0子コメント)
out of curiosity, how do you plan on addressing/preventing situations like this one?
[–]Prescription_pants 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 4 時間 前 (0子コメント)
Dude, you just sold out and left Erik to manage things. Now you're back to ruin what he built.
[–]1wf 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 4 時間 前 (0子コメント)
I don't think any rational person can have a qualm about the revenge porn update. That was a good move.
I feel like this blog post was a bit rushed and short on details regarding your plans.
[+]TotallyNotObsi スコアが基準値未満のコメント-16 ポイント-15 ポイント-14 ポイント 4 時間 前 (0子コメント)
Don't turn into an SJW
[+]TotallyNotObsi スコアが基準値未満のコメント-18 ポイント-17 ポイント-16 ポイント 4 時間 前 (0子コメント)
Fuck off
[+]stopscopiesme スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント 4 時間 前 (2子コメント)
I agree with this policy, but I predict it's not going to be enforced because of a lack of resources in the community management team. The majority of modmails I send to r/reddit.com go unanswered, and this experience is not unique to me. There are more community managers now but is it enough to handle the amount of work? It has never been in the past.
Beyond that, there are chronic stalkers and harassers who have been doing it for years and have already been IP banned, who have switched to VPNs or ToR. It seems like the admins have gotten tired of handing out the shadowbans and have given up. What is the plan for dealing with already IP-banned users?
[–]jesus_laughed 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 3 時間 前 (1子コメント)
Like who?
[–]SwedishCommie 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 3 時間 前 (0子コメント)
You.
Silly LH.
π Rendered by PID 21174 on app-139 at 2015-05-14 20:59:18.493350+00:00 running 5496224 country code: JP.
残りのコメントをみる →
[–]kn0thing[S,A] -19 ポイント-18 ポイント-17 ポイント (28子コメント)
[–]courtiebabe420 42 ポイント43 ポイント44 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]cahaseler 33 ポイント34 ポイント35 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Mikecom32 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]j0be 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]XPythagoras 22 ポイント23 ポイント24 ポイント (11子コメント)
[+]kn0thing[S] スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント (10子コメント)
[–]Soundwavetrue 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–][deleted] 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]lenaro -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (4子コメント)
[–][deleted] 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]lenaro -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–][deleted] -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]lenaro 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]lamaksha77 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]AvatarOfMomus 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]too_clever_username -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]quraid 16 ポイント17 ポイント18 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Idontknowmuch 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]the_federalist 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Idontknowmuch 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]russlar 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Prescription_pants 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]1wf 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]TotallyNotObsi スコアが基準値未満のコメント-16 ポイント-15 ポイント-14 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]TotallyNotObsi スコアが基準値未満のコメント-18 ポイント-17 ポイント-16 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]stopscopiesme スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]jesus_laughed 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]SwedishCommie 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)