あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]kn0thing[S,A] -19 ポイント-18 ポイント  (28子コメント)

Steve and I created reddit to be a platform that would connect people across the world through authentic conversations, collaboration, and community (the alliteration was not intended, but ended up being a nice touch). You’ve told us that harassment is a huge problem -- we're not happy with it either -- so we’re doing something about it. It's a process, but please help us continue to strive to get reddit to live up to the ideals it was created with; we can't do it alone.

Edit: I forgot to mention, the privacy policy update for revenge porn continues to be really well received by redditors and traffic has only continued to grow since then, so we're hopeful this is another step in the right direction.

[–]courtiebabe420 42 ポイント43 ポイント  (3子コメント)

authentic conversations

Then we need to rethink the policy on astroturfing that we've been discussing the last few days, I would think.

[–]cahaseler 33 ポイント34 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Yea, being told by an admin that:

What I mean by this is: “astroturfing” (in this case being having alts used to ask questions on your own AMA or show support for the OP) does not break reddit rules.

doesn't seem to fit with this vision of authentic conversations at all.

[–]Mikecom32 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, I'd probably say it directly contradicts that idea, honestly.

[–]j0be 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Which admin said that?

[–]XPythagoras 22 ポイント23 ポイント  (11子コメント)

Harassment is present in all internet platforms. One could say that a down vote is harassment. Sure, there are subs that the majority of us don't agree with, but who are we to silence them?

[–]quraid 16 ポイント17 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You’ve told us that harassment is a huge problem

No we haven't. Some of us may have, and some of us prefer the freedom of an open internet. and with the freedom comes both good and bad speech.

[–]Idontknowmuch 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

What about having an option to have real authenticated users, where users who want to engage in authentic conversations, collaborations and community, or in other words, which is what old reddit was anyway, can be truly authenticated?

Somehow an account gets authenticated against the person behind it, without exposing information to the site and other redditors. I don't know how this can be done, but surely there must be a way, without human interaction.

Then a user can have the option to block responses from un-authenticated users, if desired so. Something like a more die-hard "dont show below x threshold" option.

I know this is not an answer to the problem, but it is an interesting thing to look into for people who want to weed out unwanted stuff which potentially includes harassers, etc.

Also this gives new opportunities for new stuff to be done, for example, a place to do pledges, or voting within reddit. Going off topic now, but if you want to continue please read below.

I know this is a long shot but, looking at the Armenian Genocide issue, it looked like there was a lack of "visibility" of important people putting their weight behind the issue. I had an idea of how we could have a system where academics, or "vip" people (borrowing from r/IAMA) could sign on recognizing the event, and how this could be a valid proof of people whose opinion matters being behind a cause. Note that this is not simply a change.org idea, but something more. And anyway this whole thing seems to be a neat idea for people who would like to be authenticated to have a more "mature" community.

[–]the_federalist 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

"Papers please?"

[–]Idontknowmuch 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Completely optional. Anyway we do have Auto-authentication such as flairs in r/science and of course the IAMAs, why not embrace it even more and of course completely optional.

[–]russlar 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

out of curiosity, how do you plan on addressing/preventing situations like this one?

[–]Prescription_pants 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Dude, you just sold out and left Erik to manage things. Now you're back to ruin what he built.

[–]1wf 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't think any rational person can have a qualm about the revenge porn update. That was a good move.

I feel like this blog post was a bit rushed and short on details regarding your plans.