use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
詳しくは検索FAQを参照
高度な検索: 投稿者や、subredditで……
756 現在のここのユーザー
Is the flag of your region not available? Message the mods so we can add it!
Filter Russia, Ukraine, NATO New to reddit? click here!
50 countries, 230 languages, 731M people ... 1 subreddit
A forum for discussion about Europe and its neighbourhood.
Think you'd make a good moderator? Apply here. Deadline closes on the 14th of May.
Want to discuss the the addition of new moderators? Discuss it here
Subreddit schedule
Sundays: "What happened in your country this week"
IRC:
Join us on IRC: #europe on irc.snoonet.org
Snoonet link direct to IRC channel here
IRC stats
European subreddits you might enjoy:
Interesting threads from the past:
List of all European location reddits
Orban: "Non-democratic countries are more successful". Bear in mind that this person's party is still a member of the EPP (hungarianfreepress.com)
European Unionvsevolodovich が 2 日 前 投稿
[–]Delenda est euroangry_spaniard 103 ポイント104 ポイント105 ポイント 2 日 前* (3子コメント)
The rulers of non-democratic countries are more successful. Fixed!
When successful means staying in office more years.
[–]Malzair 19 ポイント20 ポイント21 ポイント 2 日 前 (2子コメント)
And making way more cash than democratic leaders. The Gaddafi family had billions upon billions upon billions.
[–]FranceSpyMonkey3D 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 1 日 前 (1子コメント)
Googled it up and found articles claiming he was the richest man in the world.
[–]Malzair 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
He kinda was, sorta. Basically a lot of the oil in Libya was sold by state oil companies and for some reason state company means "Money goes to dictator" because...l'etat c'est moi? And if you do that for enough decades you get a lot of money. A lot. More than Bill Gates.
But a lot of that money was spread out over the whole Gaddafi Family, especially sons, who used the money to build telecommunication companies, your own private army, the usual stuff.
So how much of that was really in the hands of that one person? Who knows. But was it all together more than Bill Gates ever had? You bet your ass it was.
[–]United KingdomPoachTWC 39 ポイント40 ポイント41 ポイント 2 日 前 (19子コメント)
He's obviously forgotten that Western Europe and North America are the best developed places on the planet and are all... democratic.
[–]Malzair 17 ポイント18 ポイント19 ポイント 2 日 前 (5子コメント)
Nah, we're actually all fascist dictatorships led by rich jews who genocide arabs and genocide whites by making them have less children!
Does this even need a sarcasm tag? I sure hope not...
[–]United States of AmericaSoda 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 1 日 前 (1子コメント)
Not just fascist, homofascist.
[–]Malzair 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
Oh my!
[–]dickgirl9000 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 日 前 (2子コメント)
What was the point of this post?
[–]European Unionvsevolodovich[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 日 前 (1子コメント)
TO OPEN OUR EYES
[–]Brtish/European CitizenLimitlessLTD 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
NOW I TRULY SEE!
[–]GhostOfDolorean 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 2 日 前 (9子コメント)
And this was not the case before they became... democratic?
[–]United KingdomPoachTWC 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 2 日 前 (7子コメント)
Until the industrial revolution was the Arab world not a good deal more advanced than we were in terms of science and medicine?
Besides, by his logic, when we became democratic we'd surely falter and fail. Britain was a democratic country (albeit with a limited franchise) when the industrial revolution came, and Britain came to control the largest Empire in history, growing it constantly up until the Second World War. Expansion of the franchise in Britain and France did not translate into a weakening of their power, in fact their power on the world stage only increased.
[–]tempaccountonreddit 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント 2 日 前* (4子コメント)
Not really. The Arabs have been falling behind since the 13th century.
[–]The Netherlandspiwikiwi 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 1 日 前 (3子コメント)
The Ottomans didn't.
[–]TsarDionysus 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 1 日 前 (2子コメント)
The Ottomans weren't Arab though.
[–]The Netherlandspiwikiwi 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 日 前 (1子コメント)
Good point, I can't remember what my point was:P
[–]TsarDionysus 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
If you were talking about the Islamic world, you'd definitely be right, even though the Ottomans weren't as caught up in technology as Europe is sometimes.
[–]snobby EuropeanBigBadButterCat 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 2 日 前 (1子コメント)
I wouldn't call industrial revolution Britain democratic by today's standards, the working conditions alone. You may say democracy is just a form of government and then I'll disagree and say that protection of weak members of society and of minorities is essential to democracy.
I also don't think the Arab world was as advanced as Europe by that time.
[–]United States of Americachjones994 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
thats liberal democracy.
[–]WalesG_Morgan 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
The great explosion in the west is contemporary with the rise of liberalism and democracy. The US obviously so. Britain largely saw its rise from obscurity after the middle classes put the Stuarts in their box.
[–]Bloodysneeze 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 2 日 前 (2子コメント)
In before "US isn't democratic".
[–]United States of AmericaRPG720 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 1 日 前 (1子コメント)
DAE le military industrial complex joos control Obama?
[–]Bloodysneeze 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
I figured they were going to throw out this gem. http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746
[–]GermanyTrackpoint 22 ポイント23 ポイント24 ポイント 2 日 前 (1子コメント)
With other words: I am a dictator and that is a good thing.
Great. So we begin another round of "how far does the dictator has to run the country into the ground before he gets murdered/exiled"?
[–]Orbánistan aka the Banana republic of the EUSnobbyEuropean 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
So we begin another round of "how far does the dictator has to run the country into the ground before he gets murdered/exiled"?
Keeping the current situation of Hungary in mind, I'd say your grandson is the one who will sit in front of the TV with popcorn in his hands, watching the change of government.
[–]SwedenVonSnoe 33 ポイント34 ポイント35 ポイント 2 日 前 (12子コメント)
So he is longing back to Soviet oppression?
It is mindblowing that a person who lived through soviet occupation and a totalitarian oppressive state is so clueless.
This guy just keeps going more and more full retard. EPP Should kick them out.
[–]SpainNerlian 25 ポイント26 ポイント27 ポイント 2 日 前 (1子コメント)
That depends at which side of the repression he sat at. if its anything like Spain, many of the people who where powerful before democracy held (and holds) a fair share of power after the dictatorship and some still do nowadays.
And if they don't, their offspring isn't really having a bad time either.
The repression isn't that bad when you are being the opressor.
[–]Orbánistan aka the Banana republic of the EUSnobbyEuropean 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
Same here. Some people who've foreseen the dissolution of the SU took the opportunity and changed sides. Orbán did just this, and he managed to one-up most if not all of his fellow opportunist politicians.
To this day, people talk about 89' like Orbán was the guy who risked his life and "sent the Russians home". He simply happened to know about the deal between the Hungarian prime-minister at the time and Gorbachov, then proceeded to act like some freedom-or-death kinda political-superhero.
Simicska, our very own oligarch, comes from the same bunch. According to him, he and Orbán planned to completely destroy the communist system and its left-overs (and not to create a new dictatorship). I'd take that with a grain of salt, but that kinda sums up what Fidesz was, and what it is right now.
[–]Hungarian living in the Netherlandsgerusz 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント 2 日 前 (1子コメント)
He didn't have the slightest problem with the system, his only issue was that he wasn't on top of it.
[–]EU/Hungarypolymute 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 2 日 前* (0子コメント)
Then he would have become a member of the communist party instead of leading the protest against the regime maybe?
There was nothing stopping him.
In hindsight we can easily dismiss the guts it took to take on a leading role in Imre Nagy's reburial and so on, but at the time they couldn't know whether the winds would turn and the Soviets would reverse Gorbachev's reforms and deploy tanks in Budapest again.
[–]European Unionvsevolodovich[S] 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 2 日 前 (1子コメント)
In a debate in Parliament he said that "we didn't fight the dictatorship [under soviet-style socialism] but those who ran the dictatorship." He probably just wanted to point out that some of the people in opposition now were personally involved in running the dictatorship, but literally what he said was this, and that can be easily interpreted as his only problem with the dictatorship was that he was on the wrong side of it. This is probably one of the few honest statements he's made over the years.
[–]Wallachiadngrs 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
ah so his problem is that he wasn't the one running it
[–]Hungarykaldor 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 2 日 前* (0子コメント)
No, he's just an extremely populist politician. Every time this idiot opens his mouth, you literally hear what the Fidesz communication team wants him to say. He doesn't really have independent thoughts in his speeches anymore.
He's not even talking to you guys when he says shit like this, he's talking to the voters. Think of these as real-life clickbait. When he's praising non-democratic countries or he's talking about death penalty, I guarantee that every online media will be covering it in less than 15 minutes. He's like the Big Brother: what he says is often so idiotic that you just can't escape it, it's literally everywhere. And it's working beautifully by the way, everyone knows what he has to say even here on /r/europe. Say what you will about him as a leader, but the guy knows how to play politics.
[–]Orbánistan aka the Banana republic of the EUSnobbyEuropean 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 2 日 前 (3子コメント)
EPP Should kick them out.
I'd prefer a change of government and EU integration, which never really happened in Hungary.
[–]snobby EuropeanBigBadButterCat 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 2 日 前 (2子コメント)
Hungary was considered a good example of successful EU integration until a few years ago, actually.
[–]European Unionvsevolodovich[S] 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
It's a baby-democracy, they have no experience at all in it. It's been behaving nicely up until 2006, when people realized that politicians lie in their campaign. Hell broke lose, and came Orbán who said he never ever lied to the public (he actually said that), and the democratically illiterate Hungarian people believed him and gave him basically unlimited power to do whatever he wants. Well now, after he brought more corruption, bad governance and megalomania even than the government before him, the process of disillusionment continues. It'll take decades until the Hungarian public can learn from the mistakes and handle democracy.
[–]Orbánistan aka the Banana republic of the EUSnobbyEuropean -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
I don't know about that. I guess I have high expectations regarding EU integration. Imo. bringing society closer to the EU, raising awareness about what it stands for and how it's beneficial is crucial in integration. I haven't experienced any of these things. Quite the contrary. You'd be surprised by how many people live in an another reality and are completely sure we pay more to the EU than we get back. It's also easy to find nutjobs who think the EU "doesn't give us enough" to keep Hungary in shape, when in fact, MSZP and Fidesz both took/takes any chance they get to get a cut (for personal use) of those sweet EU monies we get. EU monies that are seemingly not checked on by the EU, as millions can be spent on un-used "educational videos" and the like without repercussions, just to mention a single project Europeans' money got spent on by Hungary. If you take a look at our politics, it's also clear that a large portion, if not the majority of our society is as disconnected from Europe as an EU member can be. Altough the voting system was tweaked and the left-wing opposition was crushed, the popularity of the right-wing is frightening. They stand for everything but European values.
What I'm trying to say is, while Hungary's integration might have been a success from an economist's PoW (was it, though?), it's not successful at all regarding our society. Indifference to our politics from the EU is also a huge disappointment. The UK gets a cool myth-debunking campaign, and we're stuck with a "lol dude you dumb, you'll have to quit if you go on, lol jk." kinda response every 6 months to the pretty much constant EU-bashing by our government. While you guys were arguing about Charlie Hebdo and freedom of speech, I was laughing (in misery and) in tears (partly due to C.H) reading about taxes Fidesz struck certain TV channels with. His own media empire got out scot-free (TV2, m1, m2, Duna) and RTL, which held views opposing to Fidesz, faced existential issues. Pretty much no one gave a shit about it in the EU for a long time, until someone bothered to check on our dictator and managed to force him into creating an almost fair taxation for TV companies. I feel like we're struck by a fucktard as our glorious leader, and no one gives a shit about us or him until his actions threaten EU unity (of other members), and even then he can back out without repercussions and go on fucking with us. That's not what I'd expect from the EU regarding dealing with an integrated member state.
On a side note: I dig your flair. :)
[–]Durumbuzafeju 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
Wells he usually fancies himself as the Man who single handidly drive out the soviets from Hungary.
[–]Wallachiadngrs 60 ポイント61 ポイント62 ポイント 2 日 前 (68子コメント)
yeah people living in Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Switzerland, Netherlands, Canada, Ireland must be jealous of China, North Korea, Qatar, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Cuba, Vietnam, Syria, Egypt, Congo, Sudan, Russia.
[–]European Unionzenicaone 23 ポイント24 ポイント25 ポイント 2 日 前 (51子コメント)
Qatar, Iran, Saudi Arabia
well to be fair : being male and muslim citizen in Qatar and Saudi Arabia is something to be envious about (keeping it real)
with the rest of the list I totally agree
[–]Brtish/European CitizenLimitlessLTD 29 ポイント30 ポイント31 ポイント 2 日 前 (1子コメント)
I don't know about that, some Muslim Qatari citizens end up in slavery anyway. I think the only guarantee is being part of the royal family. But at this point that is like half the country.
[–]European Unionzenicaone -4 ポイント-3 ポイント-2 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
some Muslim Qatari citizens end up in slavery anyway
well some citizens of USA end up in prison slavery also but percentage wise - It is perfectly nice to be male muslim citizen of Qatar
(exceptions do not make the rule)
[–]Swedenxetal1 20 ポイント21 ポイント22 ポイント 2 日 前 (8子コメント)
That depends on whether you value wealth or personal freedom more.
[+]European Unionzenicaone スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント 2 日 前 (7子コメント)
well regarding personal freedoms
It is very important to know if you are really free or you just think that you are free
I believe that is why list of good countries is carefully selected in starting post
Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Switzerland, Netherlands, Canada, Ireland
Many so called democratic and free countries are not included here - why ?
Also being free to criticize your government or to draw/mock Mohamed or Jesus or whomever means nothing if you can not feed your family on your minimum wage full time job
So it is not a choice (for most/many people) between
wealth and riches vs personal freedom (as you present it)
but between basic necessities for human life vs personal freedom (very different choice)
[–]Swedenxetal1 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント 2 日 前 (6子コメント)
That's not what the discussion is about. You suggested it is something to be envious about, from a European point of reference. The contrast in question being greater wealth contra basic liberties implicitly made that the question.
While you are not wrong about a person not being free if not able to provide himself, how is that relevant? If there is a choice between "basic necessities and freedom", then that isn't freedom, and practically speaking this reasoning only applies to third world countries.
Could you name one measure of "freedom" in which Arabia has more than Europe?
[+]European Unionzenicaone スコアが基準値未満のコメント-7 ポイント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント 2 日 前 (5子コメント)
That's not what the discussion is about.
Original ? No but I was providing context to the original statement - this is discussion and discussions should not be limited - things should be viewed from as many aspects as possible in order to be understood and discussed
thus my argument "how much personal freedom is worth to you if you are homeless sick and hungry on a streets of Free society"
If you want to compare Europe and Saudi Arabia/Qatar only in limited terms of freedom , the discussion is non existent - In Europe you are almost free to say and be anything you want (depends from country to country which freedoms are somewhat limited) , while in Saudi Arabia and Qatar Freedoms are heavily limited - end of story
You suggested it is something to be envious about, from a European point of reference.
no I compared being average citizen of many/most European countries vs being citizen male and muslim in SA or Qatar
While you are not wrong about a person not being free if not able to provide himself, how is that relevant?
In a broader picture that I provided very relevant
If there is a choice between "basic necessities and freedom", then that isn't freedom,
this is the exact choice that most/many citizens are facing in real life , that is why provided broader context - if everyone in Europe would be able to live free of care for basic necessities , than discussion about "freedoms only" would make sense - now it does not
explained above
[–]Swedenxetal1 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 2 日 前 (4子コメント)
Could you name one measure of "freedom" in which Arabia has more than Europe? explained above
Are you implying people are not able to provide for themselves in Europe? That people don't have the most basic necessities?
[+]European Unionzenicaone スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント 2 日 前 (3子コメント)
So we are about to open discussion about what basic necessities are , now ?
Fine - Living paycheck to paycheck is the reality for most people in Europe now
Must take credit for any large purchase , must take credit for car or house (both , not luxury but basic necessities) or live on rent, must avoid being sick because it will affect your living standard for at least some time if not permanently in case of more serious illness , reduce travel/holiday expenses to minimum if any , save a lot to be able to educate yourself (depending from country to country though) , earn extra of your free days in order to buy yourself something you really do not have money for but want, or work two jobs if you are on minimum wage
and similar things ...
Now these are the things that most citizens of Europe are facing on a daily basis (with some being better off and some being worse off - but this is the average)
Now All those issues mentioned above are non-existent for male muslim citizens of SA and Qatar
Minimum work a lot of free time , free education (all included no additional costs) , free health care (all included no additional costs) , food electricity water housing car ... bills almost to no issue , traveling not a problem will not affect anything in your life , sickens (no matter how bad) or pregnancy will affect nothing in your life etc etc etc
[–]Swedenxetal1 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 2 日 前 (2子コメント)
Living paycheck to paycheck is the reality for most people in Europe now
That is an extremely unlikely claim, do you have any source to back that up?
earn extra of your free days in order to buy yourself something you really do not have money for but want
That's usually how it works, if you want something and don't have money for it..
[–]European Unionzenicaone -3 ポイント-2 ポイント-1 ポイント 2 日 前 (1子コメント)
I have several for USA More than two-thirds in U.S. live paycheck to paycheck: survey
Most Americans are one paycheck away from the street
Nearly Half of America Lives Paycheck-to-Paycheck
and some for Europe
Citizens in poor EU states can't afford medicines, health promoters say
40% of EU citizens can't afford a vacation
Now considering that when I say Europe I do not mean only Northern and some of Western Europe only, but Southern and Eastern Europe (not EU-only) also - I really doubt that situation is much better than in USA
In Free Western Democracies ? Sure
In SA and Qatar ? Most certainly not
and by "if you want something and don't have money for it" - no I do not mean a Lamborghini or Ferrari (not everyone in SA or Qatar is driving these also-although many do) , but I mean something in range of 1000 to 2000 Euros (a high - quality quadcopter for example or something stupid like that)
[–]No borders, no nations, fuck deportationsGunvorsejl 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント 2 日 前 (5子コメント)
Not if you oppose the government or are gay or something. If you keep your head down and fit their narrow definition of what a Muslim man is, then maybe. Still I wouldn't be envious, I like being able to work, study and party with women.
[+]European Unionzenicaone スコアが基準値未満のコメント-8 ポイント-7 ポイント-6 ポイント 2 日 前 (4子コメント)
Not if you oppose the government
Sure but why would you if everything is constructed to be in your favor (?)
or are gay or something.
sure but (afaik) you can not be gay and muslim at the same time - just like you can not be gay and catholic for example - so I was not talking about minorities (which are persecuted and oppressed there) I said
If you are male and muslim
If you keep your head down and fit their narrow definition of what a Muslim man is, then maybe.
again why would you have to keep your had down if everything is constructed to be in your favor
Still I wouldn't be envious, I like being able to work, study and party with women.
They can do all that and more - (regarding partying women -granted not in Saudi Arabia or Qatar, but they can afford quick flight to Turkey or Lebanon or even London if necessary, be there for the weekend and come back without worrying that cost/bill will affect anything in their lives)
[–]snobby EuropeanBigBadButterCat 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 2 日 前 (3子コメント)
sure but (afaik) you can not be gay and muslim at the same time - just like you can not be gay and catholic for example
You have disqualified yourself with this statement in my opinion.
What a load of tosh.
[–]European Unionzenicaone -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント 2 日 前 (2子コメント)
ok
[–]snobby EuropeanBigBadButterCat 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 1 日 前 (1子コメント)
Just to reiterate, one can be gay and Muslim/Catholic/whatever.
[–]European Unionzenicaone -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
[–]European Unionvsevolodovich[S] 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント 2 日 前 (19子コメント)
Let's keep it real: being a king in any absolute monarchy is pretty fucking awesome compared to what a Swedish citizenship can offer.
[+]European Unionzenicaone スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント 2 日 前 (18子コメント)
my statement was not limited to kings only - being regular citizen while male and muslim in Qatar and Saudi Arabia is better than being regular citizen in Sweden
[–]Croatiajankisa 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント 2 日 前 (6子コメント)
That entirely depends on how much you value wealth and having an easy life versus having personal freedoms and not having to worry that they will kill you or put you in a cell forever because you smoked a joint or had sex with a dude.
[+]European Unionzenicaone スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント 2 日 前 (5子コメント)
well when you put it that way , sounds fine
but it is perfectly diferent picture if you look it the other way
for example
how much would you value your personal freedoms to say whatever you like - if you are homeless and hungry (homelessness and hunger not an issue for SA or Qatar citizens male or female)
how much would you value your personal freedoms to say whatever you like - if you are struggling to connect paycheck to paycheck to pay bills for food electricity water rent etc and you are sickness away from being dumped on the streets
how much would you value your personal freedoms to say whatever you like - if you can not stay pregnant because that would affect your ability to pay rent
how much would you value your personal freedoms to say whatever you like - if you can not educate yourself because you can not afford it
etc etc
those are the issues that average western citizen faces on a daily basis , while being gay and free to express yourself as gay , is an issue that minority of people in West is facing
[–]Jayrate 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 2 日 前 (2子コメント)
All this aside, it's pretty clear that the prosperity of petrostates is due far more to their natural resources than their governance, no?
[–]Ukraine0xnld 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
Venezuela wasn't really prosperous in the best of times despite huge reserves. And Russia managed its oil income arguably worse than Saudis, not even mentioning Norway.
[–]European Unionzenicaone -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
arguably both
oil + governance
plenty of oil (and other valuable commodities) rich countries in Africa and elsewhere , but with citizens who live in poverty due to various reasons soooo...
[–]anarchism4thewin 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
Neither is it in western european countries.
[–]Croatiajankisa 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
We are talking about Sweden here, I'd rather be most of those things you mentioned in Sweden than having a steady job in Croatia, because the standard is much higher and Sweden takes care of it's citizens.
You are confusing what average means, average in Sweden is better than being wealthy in about 95 % of the world.
[–]Jayrate 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 2 日 前 (5子コメント)
That's not true at all. You can be executed for blasphemy and an assortment of "crimes" like extra marital sex.
[+]European Unionzenicaone スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント 2 日 前 (4子コメント)
yes that is why I said being male and muslim citizen
If you are muslim you will not commit blasphemy or extra marital sex anyway - and even if you do , you will accept your punishment as just, because you are muslim and you subscribe to that set of rules
[–]Jayrate 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 2 日 前 (3子コメント)
So basically a very small subset of the population is doing well in this dictatorship. That's not uncommon. A dictatorship with a small overclass that lives well is not uncommon.
[–]European Unionzenicaone -3 ポイント-2 ポイント-1 ポイント 2 日 前 (2子コメント)
So basically a very small subset of the population is doing well in this dictatorship.
All muslim males in both countries are doing/living Very Well - not Well (half of population - not very small subset of the population)
Females are doing somewhat Well (with some of their important freedoms limited but they are also free of many other important problems and worries that Western women are facing on a daily basis)
So no not exactly as you painted it - your description would somewhat closely work for maybe North Korea and similar countries not for Saudi Arabia or Qatar
[–]Jayrate 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 2 日 前 (1子コメント)
You were talking about devout Muslim men who don't break any of Islam's assortment of rules. That's a pretty small number. Not a lot of men realistically obey the religious laws because they're draconian.
No - not only devout muslim - all muslim who declare themselves as such (or beter to say , are born as such in those countries and considered as such by law)
They do not walk around 24/7 with you to see if you pray five times a day or whatever , and they certainly do not follow you when you leave country when you go to Lebanon or Turkey or Egypt (or somewhere else) to have some fun (that you can easily afford btw)
[–]NorwayTheEndgame 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 2 日 前 (1子コメント)
The horrible climate in Qatar alone is enough to keep me away from there.
[–]European Unionzenicaone -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
Fair enough - not your cup of tea , personal opinion though
[–]European Unionvsevolodovich[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 2 日 前 (1子コメント)
And my statement just referred to people that happen to be kings.
OK
[–]snobby EuropeanBigBadButterCat 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
Yeah, if all you care about are selfish materialistic needs.
[–]Estoniakalleluuja 13 ポイント14 ポイント15 ポイント 2 日 前 (12子コメント)
Why would I be envious of country where my mother or my daughter(or in fact any woman) has little opportunities.
[–]sob3k 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
Because you werent raised in Europe and you just dont respect women and their independence... ;)
[+]European Unionzenicaone スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント 2 日 前 (10子コメント)
well you could afford to buy them house in a country of your choice with little to no effort for starters
(if you are really keen on nitpicking my statement - my statement was limited to male muslims - I never said that it extends to your female members )
[–]Estoniakalleluuja 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント 2 日 前 (9子コメント)
What I'm saying is that if I was a male there I wouldn't be happy. Fate of my female relatives or all the rest of females would affect my happiness in negative way - not the way around as you suggest.
[–]European Unionzenicaone -5 ポイント-4 ポイント-3 ポイント 2 日 前 (8子コメント)
What I'm saying is that if I was a male there I wouldn't be happy.
well that is subjective but perfectly fine - I could find you many people who would say I would not be happy to live in USA for example - but that means nothing
So if we are to explore all aspects I presume you would (based on your statements) be more happier to see your daughters and mother being hungry and/or sick but "free" than living in countries where they never have to worry about being able to eat today , being sick and not treated because of lack of money , being unable to go to university because of lack of money etc but with some of their freedoms being limited ?
Subjective and personal opinions are irrelevant here - we are talking about average Joe in the West struggling to connect paycheck to paycheck
Also I did not mention here : mortgage/rent bills (not an issue in SA and Qatar - no homeless citizens there male/female) , banks taking over your house ...
would you think the same about importance of your personal freedoms if you were homeless in free society ?
Fate of my female relatives or all the rest of females would affect my happiness in negative way - not the way around as you suggest.
you are painting it as if females are being executed on daily bases there /facepalm - yes some of their (important) personal freedoms are limited but other than that they live fine life free of many worries that average Western woman has
[–]Estoniakalleluuja 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 2 日 前 (7子コメント)
Well, I just don't think countries with limited freedoms are successful. Success is freedom and the wealth in my book. Me and Orban have different definition of that.
[–]European Unionzenicaone -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント 2 日 前 (3子コメント)
Well, I just don't think countries with limited freedoms are successful.
Personal opinion , but fine , - in general terms countries like China , India , Malaysia , Saudi Arabia , Gulf countries .... are considered to be very successful (raw economical data - not subjective opinion)
Success is freedom and the wealth in my book
absolutely - but how many countries can claim to have both (no homeless people, no hungry people, free education free health care .... plus all personal freedoms) ?
Very few - you could probably count them on fingers of one hand
So on a world scale it is usually choice between
Personal freedoms+not being able to connect paycheck to paycheck
vs
Personal freedoms limited+being free to live nice life free of existential worries
Personal freedoms limited++not being able to connect paycheck to paycheck
Now out of three - which one would average Joe choose, if he was not among lucky few, that live several countries that provide both (Personal freedoms+being free to live nice life free of existential worries)
[–]Estoniakalleluuja 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 2 日 前 (2子コメント)
We are going in circles. People have different perception of success. In my opinion, if you are not free, you are not successful, period. In other words, my subjective opinion does not match Orbans subjective opinion. And "average joe" is not a objective opinion, just so you know.
[–]European Unionzenicaone -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 2 日 前 (1子コメント)
People have different perception of success.
sure
In my opinion, if you are not free, you are not successful, period.
sure , in your opinion , nothing wrong with that
In other words, my subjective opinion does not match Orbans subjective opinion
sure people have differing opinions - Eureka (!?)
And "average joe" is not a objective opinion, just so you know.
? no average joe is most certainly not an opinion - it is an expression used when you want to say average citizen of some area
Average Joe is Average Citizen (if Joe is confusing for you)
your living standard might be higher than living standard of average citizen of Europe , thus your priorities are different than priorities of average citizen , mine could be also higher , but if we want to discus Objectively and with the contexts we must talk about priorities of average citizen in order to Be objective and not Subjective (if we were to discus things from our own perspective)
That is why I say Average Joe/Average Citizen
[–]Russiasolz1 -4 ポイント-3 ポイント-2 ポイント 2 日 前 (2子コメント)
You have to check how things are in reality, not in books.
[–]Estoniakalleluuja 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
Thanks for great advice.
[–]United States of AmericaRPG720 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
Great advice from 1918.
[–]bricardo 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
Unless you're gay, political, or want to demand more from your country.
[–]Belgiumtrop_commercial 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 2 日 前 (15子コメント)
China is pretty successful though.
[–]FranceNorrisOBE 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント 2 日 前 (6子コメント)
China has more males than females and their constant growing middle class will definitely lead up to a democratic reform one way or another.
They're a successful Capitalist economy, but also a failing Socialist government.
[–]FinlandtehzeroFIN 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 2 日 前 (2子コメント)
Is the male-female ratio in France 50-50? And if I remember right the difference is "just" few million, which isn't that huge when we are talking about China, anyways there was an article about more chinese men marrying russian women.
[–]PolandStudentOfMrKleks 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
It is not just few milion: http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2012/images/11/14/111312_china_one_child_bp.jpg
[–]Black RomaniaNuruYetu 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 日 前 (2子コメント)
will definitely lead up to a democratic reform one way or another
If you're interested, there's a TED talk from Eric X. Li that challenges your claim.
EDIT: another TEDtalk that tries to explain China's rise
[–]FranceNorrisOBE 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 1 日 前 (1子コメント)
I've seen that talk and the rebuttal to that talk was better
The big flaw to Mr. Li's idea is China's lack of transparency and a rising brain drain. As more of the middle class demands answers when the housing bubble comes and more Chinese citizens are leaving China in droves, there WILL be a stability crisis within the government.
The next change in a mainland Chinese government will be democracy, and while that will decades, it will still happen.
[–]Black RomaniaNuruYetu 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
Hadn't read that rebuttal, thanks for sharing.
I however think some of Li's points still stand. TI may be skewed by transparency when comparing China to democracies, but the rising trend of China over time in the TI is unlikely explained solely by increased opacity, certainly when you see the staggering amount of interpersonal trust in China as per the World Value Study which contrasts heavily with the other authoritarian system used as example, Soviet Russia and its citizens fear of being denounced. It indicates that the mentioned "coercion" is at least of a very different nature and less perceptible, and that perhaps the CCP did in some way change with less corruption as a result. Secondly, and I link that to the second talk I've shared in the comment above: China is very different from the concept of a nation-state. Thus, even if we predict the rise of a demand for popular voice, that demand can be formulated and met very differently, resulting in probably something different from what we have for "democracies". The extensive use of surveys that Li mentioned is a very good example and can be seen as an attempt to meet such demand.
[–]IrelandOrionmcdonald 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 2 日 前 (3子コメント)
It is but its still pretty low on a lot of developmental indexes, you got to keep in mind that they were coming from such a low base in the late 80's after the cultural revolution. if anything china based on it's size was huge underperformer for many years, we still don't know what will happen to them when they reach middle-income status and they've yet to create any major brands or products, mostly relying on manufacture.
[–]Belgiumtrop_commercial -5 ポイント-4 ポイント-3 ポイント 2 日 前 (2子コメント)
I don't know if you could sell the Mao era short like that. Statistics are fuzzy, but a lot of industrialisation happened during that time.
Anyhow, it is true that China is still low on a lot of developmental indexes. But if we take a look at say India, it seems to me that China has very much brought a sixth of the world population forward, for which I respect them, despite all their flaws.
[–]IrelandOrionmcdonald 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 2 日 前 (1子コメント)
True totally true, but the Mao era was brutal for its economy and infrastructure, mass famine was a regular feature even before the cultural revolution, and it wasn't just that it was inefficent, but it also saw an entire generation of teachers and administrators wiped out which was extremely hard to recover from. I think that it has as well, but we have to compare China to its cultural cousins in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Singapore (and perhaps unfairly) ask what could have been without years of shitty communist rule.
[–]Belgiumtrop_commercial -3 ポイント-2 ポイント-1 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
Hong Kong and Singapore are city states, financial hubs of global capitalism. Every country has its very own circumstances and pre-existing conditions and these could not be more different in this case.
Famine was a regular feature but it was solved under Mao. Food production went up greatly. Industrialisation and urbanisation happened in an extreme pace. (I can give you sources if you want). Of course the expected problems of state socialism were present, but as it did in the Soviet Union, it achieved industrialization on a never before seen scale. And it is on this groundwork that Deng Xiaoping achieved succesful market reforms.
What could have been without shitty communist rule? Ideally a scenario like Japan? Or is a scenario like India's more likely, where more people have been dying from hunger or hunger related deaths every ten years than people died in the Great Leap Forward?
[–]Wallachiadngrs 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
judging by what? if we look at HDI then it ranks 91/187 which isn't great http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Human_Development_Index
[–]SloveniaU5K0 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
Unless you have decadent western lungs.
[–]GermanyAunvilgod 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
Life is still shit for a LOT of people there. You measure a nations wealth at its lowest humans.
[–]Estoniakalleluuja -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
Who knows for how long they are going to be able to keep authoritarian regime though. It's still to be seen.
[–]United Kingdomieya404 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント 2 日 前 (2子コメント)
Hypothetically, I can see that a benevolent dictatorship might be better (as it can afford to take decisions which benefit in the long-term, at the cost of short-term popularity).
The trouble is in arranging for the dictator to be benevolent, which I think has generally eluded the real world so far...
[–]SpainNerlian 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
I think every dictator ever has always thought they've been the best thing to happen to their country since sliced bread.
[–]sob3k 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
Hypothetically, I can see that a benevolent dictatorship might be better
This was what ancient Greeks thought. Democracy for good days, but when the misery hits, we got the dictator!
[–]RomaniaCrocoduck1 14 ポイント15 ポイント16 ポイント 2 日 前 (2子コメント)
Wtf Hungary why tolerate this buffon ?
[–]Italyporcazozza 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント 2 日 前 (1子コメント)
tfw
[–]Nationality is a coincidence - EU master racemelitonz 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
flair checks out
[–]Fryslân/BilkertTheActualAWdeV 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント 2 日 前 (28子コメント)
Yes, North Korea and Belarus are doing so well.
[–]FinlandtehzeroFIN 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 2 日 前 (3子コメント)
How about Singapore? They have (or have had) pretty authotarian government with one party holding power for ages.
[–]Nationality is a coincidence - EU master racemelitonz 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
I've always been amazed by Singapore.
[–]pies n gravySlyRatchet 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 日 前 (1子コメント)
I don't know much about Singapore. I always thought that they were a democracy that just happened to continuously vote the same party in all the time (Mexico and South Africa used to be democratic one party states too).
Am I right with this? Can someone with more knowledge about Singapore chime in?
[–]Czech RepublicOv3rpowered 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
Not really. They are basically a dictatorship, but when their dictator died recently, it was a national tragedy. He ruled sternly bud fairly and managed to make Singapore's economy explode. He managed lot of things the West couldn't because of its slow and cumbersome democratic process. People like results, he accomplished them.
Brunei is somewhat similar, absolute monarchy and very successful with reasonable freedom for its citizens. Also maybe Salazar's Portugal etc.
[–]Belgiumtrop_commercial 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 2 日 前 (2子コメント)
Belarus is doing quite well isn't it? Kazakhstan also.
North Korea not so much no...
[–]Fryslân/BilkertTheActualAWdeV -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント 2 日 前 (1子コメント)
Belarus is doing quite well isn't it?
Hmm, I dunno. Is it? Don't know about Kazakhstan either but now I do wonder.
[–]Belgiumtrop_commercial 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
I'm just looking at economic growth though. Democracy is also an achievement, in my opinion.
Either way: http://www.google.be/publicdata/explore?ds=d5bncppjof8f9_&met_y=ny_gdp_pcap_cd&idim=country:KAZ:RUS:TKM&hl=en&dl=en#!ctype=l&strail=false&bcs=d&nselm=h&met_y=ny_gdp_pcap_pp_kd&scale_y=lin&ind_y=false&rdim=region&idim=country:KAZ:RUS:POL:BLR:UKR&ifdim=region&hl=en_US&dl=en&ind=false
[–]Romaniaanarchisto 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 2 日 前 (12子コメント)
Bringing examples is pointless because you can find examples that are the other way around.
For instance, Belarus is doing a lot better than a democracy like India.
[–]Jayrate 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 2 日 前 (1子コメント)
India is an amazingly corrupt democracy with a far different history than Belarus. Probably the best comparison we have would be East vs West Germany. It's pretty clear which side was more successful.
[–]Romaniaanarchisto 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
West Germany was more successful because of the economic system, not because of politics.
If we look at countries around the world, it's pretty obvious that economic success has absolutely nothing to do with the political system, but rather with the economic system and that can be implemented well in a dictatorship (China is a good example) or in democracy (as in West Germany).
[–]TurkeyBhdrbyr 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント 2 日 前 (5子コメント)
Wut? India is a regional power, a nuclear state, third largest standing army in the world and a major economy which is one of the fastest growing economies. Belarus? A small landlocked eastern european country that has little to no relevancy?
[–]Romaniaanarchisto 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント 2 日 前 (3子コメント)
Do you think that the 270 million Indians who live on under $1.25 per day care that India is a nuclear state?
[–]TurkeyBhdrbyr 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント 2 日 前 (1子コメント)
India is the second most populous country in the world, we are talking about over 1.2 billion people. Poverty is not a result of democracy.
[–]BulgariaOmortag 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
Yes, but the size of their army and money left over for nuclear weapons is a result of their size.
[–]Chinafoop_plinger 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
India IS lifting millions of people out of poverty every year.
[–]Gotebe -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
Big does not equal good,wtf?!
And do you honestly believe that Belarus isn't doing better on the democracy level?
[–]Wallachiadngrs 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 2 日 前* (1子コメント)
go compare the best of each to see the potential of each system
ie Norway and North Korea http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy_Index
So you bring up such an established democracy as India for your argument. I can even accept an argument that established democracies are not succesful because they are democracies but they are democracies because they have been successful. That's a valid argument, but the extreme instability of dictatorships is hardly debatable. You're defending an undefendable case.
[–]Romaniaanarchisto -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
I'm not defending any case. I just said that using examples is not a valid argument because there are counter-examples.
[–]Polandmaorycy 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
You don't actually know much about Belarus, do you?
[+]peren3 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント 2 日 前 (6子コメント)
Comparing Belarus to Ukraine, Belarus did way better than Ukraine since 1990.
Countries like South Korea, Singapore etc, did extremely well under more or less dictatorships. Chile under Pinochet is another example, which outperformed the whole South America.
It's not dictatorship per se, but a strong government with the ability and willingness to implement good reforms and a long rule that is beneficial.
[–]NorwayNimonic 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント 2 日 前 (4子コメント)
Chile under Pinochet is another example, which outperformed the whole South America.
Economically. You still probably wouldn't want to live there. You know, death squads and all.
[–]European Unionvsevolodovich[S] 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
Don't you see the great migration patterns toward dictatorships? /sarcasm
[–]Romaniaanarchisto 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 2 日 前 (2子コメント)
Not even economically. During the 1973-1990, while Pinochet was in power, Chile had a lower GDP per capita than the rest of South America.
[–]NorwayNimonic 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 2 日 前* (1子コメント)
Yeah, I figured that might be the case. I just couldn't be arsed to find the stats to prove it because I thought "death squads" was good enough a reason.
[–]Romaniaanarchisto -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
The "Chilean miracle" is a myth was propagated because Chile was the first neoliberal experiment.
It was an experiment. It failed to create the economic growth, but it succeeded in bringing the wealth to a small elite at the expense of misery for the masses.
[–]Jayrate 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
The best comparison we have is probably East and West Germany. In this case, most other variables like history and geography are somewhat controlled for. And you'd be hard pressed to find someone who thinks the east was more successful by any measure.
[–]European Federationjtalin 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
He's just saying what the rest of EPP are thinking.
[–]londonghost 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
Well, constitutional apply monarchy is certainly better than democracy. Freedom is fundamentally incompatible with democracy, but in monarchy it's possible as long as the king supports it.
[–]Hungary/United States of Americajravihun 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
This guy seriously needs to shut up.
[–]England, United Kingdompurpleslug 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 2 日 前 (2子コメント)
Fidesz is retarded. Viktor Orban was the head of Liberal International as well. So hypocritical.
[–]anarchism4thewin -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 1 日 前 (1子コメント)
Maybe his views changed over time.
[–]England, United Kingdompurpleslug -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
...lol, no. It's opportunistic populism
[–]GermanyBrazul 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
north korea-best korea
[–]Republic of MacedoniaXY100 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
Bear in mind that this person's party is still a member of the EPP
LOL, EPP supported our corrupt and also non-democratic Prime minister and Government. What a joke for them.
[–]Polandhockiklocki 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
Maybe we should start thinking less about being successful and more about majority of people living better lives.
[–]Hungaryschaas 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
This is actually more about liberal democracy than democracy. Some Hungarian conservative intellectuals (i.e. Körösényi) are toying with resurrecting Max Webers idea of leadership democracy as opposed to liberal democracy, as it could be more useful for countries like us that do not have a fully Western culture, meaning a strong, independent thinking middle class bourgeois people.
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/weber/#ChaLeaDem
[–]LondonNeasden93 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 2 日 前 (18子コメント)
And a lot of people suffer or are killed under non-democratic countries. Look at the history of Europe.
[–]Orbánistan aka the Banana republic of the EUSnobbyEuropean 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
Do you really think he gives a shit about that? He has no morals whatsoever.
[+]Romaniaanarchisto スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント 2 日 前 (16子コメント)
And a lot of people suffer or are killed by democratic countries abroad. Look at the history of South America.
[–]LondonNeasden93 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 2 日 前 (1子コメント)
Yes, but it's more likely to happen under non-democratic countries.
[–]United KingdomGloriousYardstick 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
Yeah because we get to pull out the 'not a true democracy' card whenever it suits the argument.
[–]Europatitich 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 2 日 前 (13子コメント)
Yeah look at the history of Chile...
[–]NorwayNimonic 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 2 日 前* (2子コメント)
I think that might actually have been sort of his point, considering the coup came with the aid of the US. I suppose that might have been your point, but better safe than sorry.
[–]Europatitich 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 2 日 前 (1子コメント)
Uh you're right, I misunderstood what he meant. Point somewhat stands anyway... Pinochet killed all those people, democracy in itself wasn't at fault for that.
[–]NorwayNimonic 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
Yep, that's fair.
[–]Romaniaanarchisto 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 2 日 前 (9子コメント)
And Chile was not the first nor the last country with a democratically-elected leader to be overthrown by the US.
Proud moments include:
[–]SpainNerlian 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 2 日 前 (4子コメント)
And when did the US depose Chávez? Did I miss something?
EDIT: Also lol @ Chavez being "democratically elected".
[–]Wallachiadngrs -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 2 日 前 (3子コメント)
I think he means this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_Venezuelan_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat_attempt#Allegations_of_US_involvement
[–]SpainNerlian 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 2 日 前 (2子コメント)
Shortly before the coup attempt, Chávez dismissed possible hostility from the United States, since "times had changed."
He later "changed opinion" and in any case they are just allegations. You know, for Venezuela and all those Central/South americans banana republics USA its a nice scape goat. Everything is either the USA to blame or the imperial colonialists fault.
Nothing more trustworthy than the words of a dictator in need of something to put blame on the shortcomings of their country.
Im not a fan of our current king, but I have to admit that the old one had his moments
[–]Wallachiadngrs 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 2 日 前 (1子コメント)
I don't speak spanish
[–]SpainNerlian -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
I found it subtitled https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YwV8vS23Csc
[–]United States of AmericaRaven0520 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 2 日 前 (2子コメント)
Venezuela 2002 -- democratically-elected president Chavez nationalized oil industry.
Yeah...ok.
[–]Romaniaanarchisto -3 ポイント-2 ポイント-1 ポイント 2 日 前 (1子コメント)
The 1998 election which brought Chavez to power was democratic. Chavez was able to get most of the votes of the poorer sections of Venezuelan society.
[–]United States of AmericaRaven0520 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
I don't care about that, where is the evidence that we tried to overthrow him? If we knew about it and did nothing, that counts as overthrowing the government?
[–]EU/Hungarypolymute 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 2 日 前* (15子コメント)
yet for Mandiner.hu–a conservative news site–this aspect proved to be the most striking part of the speech.
Minor detail, but I wouldn't quite call Mandiner conservative - they are a weird social-liberallish-but-still-sometimes-nationalist mashup site and used to be the loyal opposition, though not so loyal in the last few years IMO.
[–]kradem 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 2 日 前 (12子コメント)
The most conservative party in Croatia is one with the same silly name you used here: Croatian Social Liberal Party.
P.S. conservative liberal center is 99% of Croatia's politics lately
[–]EU/Hungarypolymute 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 2 日 前 (1子コメント)
Yeah, there's a tendency for such names. Check out the Liberal Democratic Party in Japan for example.
Or, for that matter Fidesz's name is originally a portmanteau of Fiatal Demokraták Szövetsége, meaning the Alliance of Young Democrats. How's that for irony, eh?
[–]kradem -5 ポイント-4 ポイント-3 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
Liberal is compatible with democratic, but "social liberal" is oxymoron.
That's a pragmatic populism: "We used to try as much we could, but we just found out that problem isn't in ourselves - it's in the democracy itself!" :-))
[–]Croatiajankisa 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 2 日 前 (9子コメント)
I'm pretty sure HSLS is not the most conservative party in Croatia.
[–]kradem -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 2 日 前 (8子コメント)
I'm sure it is and I'm sure our differences aren't there because we differentiate in knowledge about HSLS, so it's expected that you present what conservative means for you in a young transition democracy like Croatia.is.
[–]Croatiajankisa 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 2 日 前 (7子コメント)
Ooooooor you are just making shit up as usual only with no people to call you out on it.
[–]kradem -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント 2 日 前 (6子コメント)
Please leave your ad hominem shit where it's belong, to bloody r/croatia.
Put here some proofs for your complains that HSLS isn't the most conservative political option in Republic of Croatia (cause you should fucking prove it isn't - it's not on me to prove it is).
But you can't, you're fucking going to accuse me I'm a bloody Dnevno reader or bring another such a bloody idiotic ad hominem "proof" I'm wrong, you'll get some circlejerk upvotes from your fellow retards from r/croatia and sleep peacefully...
Go to hell moron!
[–]Croatiajankisa 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 日 前 (5子コメント)
I'm guessing you tried all of the other retard magnet parties but you weren't satisfied with the level of conservatism, like HSP, HČSP, HSP-AS, HRAST, HDSB etc.
It's not at hominem to point out that you are lying here, hopefully soon people realize how much of a nutjob you are and chase you out of this sub because having something like reddit to obsess about is very worrying for a unstable person such as you.
[–]kradem -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 1 日 前* (4子コメント)
You're an idiot.
Bloody idiot.
Bloody fucking idiot.
In a country that is a legal descendant of a communist state, in a country with base political struggle of get rid of heritage its nation members deeds in forming Nazi state during WWII, in a country that entered EU some 10-15 years before the countries in the neighbourhood that supposed to join together with Croatia, you are presenting... No, sorry, you're listing fucking all right and right populist parties as fucking conservative options?
For God sake, are you aware how's retarded that? Are you aware how bloody gayregionalistic is your fucking try to identify right wing with conservatism in the Republic of Croatia?
Dude, there are two options: you're mocking me (and just used last comment to improve your r/croatia abilities to attack ad hominem way) or you're fucking thinking conservative options are placed on right populist side.
If latter is the answer then I have wish to continue debate with you. Not because I have some sorrow for you, but because some of you ugly motherfucking retards from r/croatia finally showed some will to debate about something.
So, to open a debate with you I'll ask you a simple question using some information that's still fresh in memory: if those parties are conservative, who brought Croatia to be the 5th country in EU on legislative matter for LGBTQ community acceptance?
[–]Croatiajankisa 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 日 前 (3子コメント)
Haha, if you really think I'm gonna spend my time arguing with a troubled person about the definition of conservatism you are even more insane than I thought.
[–]kradem 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 日 前* (2子コメント)
Haha, if you really think I'm gonna spend my time arguing with a troubled person
What the heck "troubled" has to do with the fact you provide notoriously dumb "proof" I'm wrong stating HSLS is the most conservative political option in the Republic of Croatia?
And what the troubled adjective means?
about the definition of conservatism you are even more insane than I thought.
It's not about definition you bloody retard, it's about running the fuckin' country's politics you pity worthy ignorant!
[–]European Unionvsevolodovich[S] -4 ポイント-3 ポイント-2 ポイント 2 日 前 (1子コメント)
It is conservative precisely in the way Fidesz is. A weird nationalist, populist mixture, socially on the right, economically a chaos, supporting a flat tax but meanwhile deploying left-wing populist elements that Occupy folks would applaud enthusiastically (anti-bank measuges eg). Frankly, it makes no sense from a Western point of view, maybe some national socialism kind of stuff. Similarly, the opposition "left" would be considered market fundamentalists in western Europe.
[–]Ginkgopsida 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 2 日 前 (1子コメント)
I'm keeping an eye on you hungary....
[–]FranceNorrisOBE 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
Oh, vraiment?
Compare North Korea to let's say, Sweden then we'll talk.
And no, do not mention China. China is bigger than the rest of the EU, so any comparison between China and an ant farm is pretty much void, Monsieur Orban.
[–]vivacitas 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 2 日 前 (3子コメント)
Let's jump forward a bit in the historic cycle that's being repeated in Europe... What happens when a NATO country attacks its NATO neighbors (possibly with the help of an outside nuclear power it's ideologically aligned with) ?
[–]Finlandspin0 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 2 日 前 (1子コメント)
historic cycle that's being repeated
/r/badhistory
[–]vivacitas 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
I only do good analytics, sorry.
[–]United KingdomPoachTWC 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
Are we expecting a nuclear war in Europe in the near future or something?
[–]Nationality is a coincidence - EU master racemelitonz -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 1 日 前 (0子コメント)
I wish there was a "I want the EU to delegate politicians to the Parliament" option on the ballot.
As a Hungarian, lurking in /r/Europe basically always comes with a little walk of shame, too bad there isn't a filter Orbán button on the sidebar.
(Not that the opposition is better..)
[+]AustraliaOhmygoditsabird スコアが基準値未満のコメント-12 ポイント-11 ポイント-10 ポイント 2 日 前 (4子コメント)
This is Doublespeak but he's right, the reason the West is 'successful' is because it is a Corporatist Oligarchical Netocracy (run by a network).
Democracy works for municipalities and tribes, whom are the only governments that have ever practiced the concept, what we actually need as an improvement is Corporatist Panarchical Isocracy.
Democracy is immature, it's just mob rule based where those with an imaginary status (citizenship) are allowed to be part of the mob.
[–]Hamburgjieling 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント 2 日 前 (3子コメント)
making up words doesn't give your argument any weight.
[–]United States of AmericaRaven0520 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
Dude, he broke out ALL the buzzwords for that.
[–]Hungarian living in the Netherlandsgerusz 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
It read like something from Tumblr.
[+]AustraliaOhmygoditsabird スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント 2 日 前 (0子コメント)
I didn't make them up, why don't you try using google, and no, all words are made up so even if I was making up words it still works. Why don't you respond to my actual point instead of calling out my use of language, why comment at all?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netocracy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isocracy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panarchy
π Rendered by PID 32523 on app-210 at 2015-05-14 18:42:19.074478+00:00 running 1bed5cc country code: JP.
[–]Delenda est euroangry_spaniard 103 ポイント104 ポイント105 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Malzair 19 ポイント20 ポイント21 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]FranceSpyMonkey3D 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Malzair 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]United KingdomPoachTWC 39 ポイント40 ポイント41 ポイント (19子コメント)
[–]Malzair 17 ポイント18 ポイント19 ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]United States of AmericaSoda 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Malzair 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]dickgirl9000 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]European Unionvsevolodovich[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Brtish/European CitizenLimitlessLTD 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]GhostOfDolorean 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (9子コメント)
[–]United KingdomPoachTWC 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]tempaccountonreddit 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]The Netherlandspiwikiwi 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]TsarDionysus 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]The Netherlandspiwikiwi 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]TsarDionysus 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]snobby EuropeanBigBadButterCat 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]United States of Americachjones994 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]WalesG_Morgan 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Bloodysneeze 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]United States of AmericaRPG720 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Bloodysneeze 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]GermanyTrackpoint 22 ポイント23 ポイント24 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Orbánistan aka the Banana republic of the EUSnobbyEuropean 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]SwedenVonSnoe 33 ポイント34 ポイント35 ポイント (12子コメント)
[–]SpainNerlian 25 ポイント26 ポイント27 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Orbánistan aka the Banana republic of the EUSnobbyEuropean 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Hungarian living in the Netherlandsgerusz 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]EU/Hungarypolymute 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]European Unionvsevolodovich[S] 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Wallachiadngrs 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Hungarykaldor 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Orbánistan aka the Banana republic of the EUSnobbyEuropean 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]snobby EuropeanBigBadButterCat 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]European Unionvsevolodovich[S] 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Orbánistan aka the Banana republic of the EUSnobbyEuropean -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Durumbuzafeju 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Wallachiadngrs 60 ポイント61 ポイント62 ポイント (68子コメント)
[–]European Unionzenicaone 23 ポイント24 ポイント25 ポイント (51子コメント)
[–]Brtish/European CitizenLimitlessLTD 29 ポイント30 ポイント31 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]European Unionzenicaone -4 ポイント-3 ポイント-2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Swedenxetal1 20 ポイント21 ポイント22 ポイント (8子コメント)
[+]European Unionzenicaone スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]Swedenxetal1 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント (6子コメント)
[+]European Unionzenicaone スコアが基準値未満のコメント-7 ポイント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]Swedenxetal1 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント (4子コメント)
[+]European Unionzenicaone スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Swedenxetal1 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]European Unionzenicaone -3 ポイント-2 ポイント-1 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]No borders, no nations, fuck deportationsGunvorsejl 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント (5子コメント)
[+]European Unionzenicaone スコアが基準値未満のコメント-8 ポイント-7 ポイント-6 ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]snobby EuropeanBigBadButterCat 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]European Unionzenicaone -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]snobby EuropeanBigBadButterCat 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]European Unionzenicaone -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]European Unionvsevolodovich[S] 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント (19子コメント)
[+]European Unionzenicaone スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント (18子コメント)
[–]Croatiajankisa 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント (6子コメント)
[+]European Unionzenicaone スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]Jayrate 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Ukraine0xnld 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]European Unionzenicaone -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]anarchism4thewin 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Croatiajankisa 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Jayrate 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (5子コメント)
[+]European Unionzenicaone スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]Jayrate 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]European Unionzenicaone -3 ポイント-2 ポイント-1 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Jayrate 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]European Unionzenicaone -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]NorwayTheEndgame 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]European Unionzenicaone -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]European Unionvsevolodovich[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]European Unionzenicaone -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]snobby EuropeanBigBadButterCat 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Estoniakalleluuja 13 ポイント14 ポイント15 ポイント (12子コメント)
[–]sob3k 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]European Unionzenicaone スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント (10子コメント)
[–]Estoniakalleluuja 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント (9子コメント)
[–]European Unionzenicaone -5 ポイント-4 ポイント-3 ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]Estoniakalleluuja 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]European Unionzenicaone -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Estoniakalleluuja 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]European Unionzenicaone -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Russiasolz1 -4 ポイント-3 ポイント-2 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Estoniakalleluuja 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]United States of AmericaRPG720 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]bricardo 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Belgiumtrop_commercial 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (15子コメント)
[–]FranceNorrisOBE 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]FinlandtehzeroFIN 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]PolandStudentOfMrKleks 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Black RomaniaNuruYetu 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]FranceNorrisOBE 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Black RomaniaNuruYetu 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]IrelandOrionmcdonald 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Belgiumtrop_commercial -5 ポイント-4 ポイント-3 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]IrelandOrionmcdonald 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Belgiumtrop_commercial -3 ポイント-2 ポイント-1 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Wallachiadngrs 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]SloveniaU5K0 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]GermanyAunvilgod 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Estoniakalleluuja -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]United Kingdomieya404 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]SpainNerlian 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]sob3k 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]RomaniaCrocoduck1 14 ポイント15 ポイント16 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Italyporcazozza 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Nationality is a coincidence - EU master racemelitonz 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Fryslân/BilkertTheActualAWdeV 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント (28子コメント)
[–]FinlandtehzeroFIN 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Nationality is a coincidence - EU master racemelitonz 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]pies n gravySlyRatchet 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Czech RepublicOv3rpowered 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Belgiumtrop_commercial 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Fryslân/BilkertTheActualAWdeV -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Belgiumtrop_commercial 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Romaniaanarchisto 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (12子コメント)
[–]Jayrate 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Romaniaanarchisto 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]TurkeyBhdrbyr 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]Romaniaanarchisto 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]TurkeyBhdrbyr 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]BulgariaOmortag 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Chinafoop_plinger 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Gotebe -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Wallachiadngrs 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]European Unionvsevolodovich[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Romaniaanarchisto -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Polandmaorycy 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]peren3 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]NorwayNimonic 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]European Unionvsevolodovich[S] 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Romaniaanarchisto 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]NorwayNimonic 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Romaniaanarchisto -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Jayrate 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]European Federationjtalin 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]londonghost 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Hungary/United States of Americajravihun 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]England, United Kingdompurpleslug 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]anarchism4thewin -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]England, United Kingdompurpleslug -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]GermanyBrazul 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Republic of MacedoniaXY100 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Polandhockiklocki 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Hungaryschaas 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]LondonNeasden93 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (18子コメント)
[–]Orbánistan aka the Banana republic of the EUSnobbyEuropean 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]Romaniaanarchisto スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント (16子コメント)
[–]LondonNeasden93 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]United KingdomGloriousYardstick 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Europatitich 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (13子コメント)
[–]NorwayNimonic 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Europatitich 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]NorwayNimonic 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Romaniaanarchisto 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (9子コメント)
[–]SpainNerlian 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]Wallachiadngrs -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]SpainNerlian 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Wallachiadngrs 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]SpainNerlian -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]United States of AmericaRaven0520 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Romaniaanarchisto -3 ポイント-2 ポイント-1 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]United States of AmericaRaven0520 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]EU/Hungarypolymute 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (15子コメント)
[–]kradem 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (12子コメント)
[–]EU/Hungarypolymute 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]kradem -5 ポイント-4 ポイント-3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Croatiajankisa 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (9子コメント)
[–]kradem -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]Croatiajankisa 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]kradem -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]Croatiajankisa 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]kradem -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]Croatiajankisa 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]kradem 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]European Unionvsevolodovich[S] -4 ポイント-3 ポイント-2 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Ginkgopsida 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]FranceNorrisOBE 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]vivacitas 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Finlandspin0 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]vivacitas 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]United KingdomPoachTWC 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Nationality is a coincidence - EU master racemelitonz -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]AustraliaOhmygoditsabird スコアが基準値未満のコメント-12 ポイント-11 ポイント-10 ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]Hamburgjieling 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]United States of AmericaRaven0520 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Hungarian living in the Netherlandsgerusz 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]AustraliaOhmygoditsabird スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント (0子コメント)