Dude, I'm generally the first person to get upset about stolen artwork or artwork used without permission or attribution.

The only bit of evidence provided that the OP is a picture on Imgur that's several hours younger than the OP's submission. Personally, I need morre evidence than that, any rational person would.

So, I did a google image search. Outside of Imgur and Reddit, there were no hits. Suggesting that the content the OP posted was something they photographed themselves.

So far as you citing the "witch hunting" rule, it doesn't apply to the request for a website. It's a rather lame excuse not to provide evidence to add substance to your claim. I know of no artist that wants their website hidden.

All the evidence we've got on the situation paints you to be full of shit.