Sharia Enforcement: Muhammad Cartoon Contest Winner Bosch Fawstin Removed from Facebook

AFDI Muhammad Art Exhibit and Contest Facebook Censorship Left/Islamic Alliance: Media, intelligentsia

87 Comments

It is somehow ironic that the younger generation that was raised on leftist propaganda in academia and in the culture is so eager to utterly relinquish our freedoms without so much as a fight. The hippies and bippies and free love gave us totalitarianism and subjugation.

Free love. It made whores of women, broke our homes and turned our men into women. Case in point: Mark Zuckerberg. All his speechifying about freedom of speech and freedom of expression and without so much as an internal struggle, he embraces sharia. Bosch Fawstin is by no means the first counter-jihadist to be removed from Facebook. And I am sure he will not be the last.

Zuckerberg is a cowardly punk ….. with enormous power.

Here is Bosch’s winning Muhammad cartoon:

Email this page

Stay on top of what's really happening. Follow me on Twitter here. Like me on Facebook here.

Print This Post

ByPamela Geller

on May 7, 2015

Disclamer

Comments at Atlas Shrugs are unmoderated. Posts using foul language, as well as abusive, hateful, libelous and genocidal posts, will be deleted if seen. However, if a comment remains on the site, it in no way constitutes an endorsement by Pamela Geller of the sentiments contained therein.

Dave Quilty

I added this to my FB page

e sui Charlie
I am Geller
I am Spencer
I am WIlders
I am Fawstin
I am Boston Strong
I am Fort Hood
I am 9.11.01
I am Rushdie
I am van Gogh
I am Fortuyn
I am Hirisi Ali
I am Vestergaard
I am Vilks
I am Norris
I am Nakoula
- Tyrehl Byk
  
  Why?
  - m Si
    
    It’s really time to start a real alternative to Fraudbook and stop this fool. I’ve already deleted my account. Who is with me?
    - Mark Phukerberg
      
      Why in the hell would you post photos of yourself on the internet anyway? I guess most folks have no sense of privacy. I never had a Fraudbook account to delete.
      - m Si
        
        I know what you mean. I joined to keep up with my reunion. It worked for that purpose but I couldn’t see a use for it on an ongoing basis. I deleted my account due to that and Zuck’s lax view of privacy on the site. I keep hoping the rest of the free world will find some reason to do the same. It’s funny but I think here in the U.S. it’s largely an older demographic that’s keeping it going.
    - Debra
      
      Conservative Junction is an alternative.
- yotambien
  
  Done!
- DM
  
  Will you let us know when FB deletes you. Which of course will happen if noticed by FB.
- http://freerepublic.com GOPcongress
  
  I am Conservative
  I am Tea Party
  I am Constitutionalist
Beagle

I would quit FB but I never joined. I can’t believe anyone voluntarily submits to so much abuse of their personal information without getting paid for it.
426 HemiCuda

Screw Facebook!
Rocinante44

this is no surprise. the 60’s term “liberal” has never meant “open-minded”, just like “gay” has never described what it means to be “homosexual”. The 60’s “liberal” loathes God and christian western civiliization, and wants to replace them with a godless state ruled by so-called “elites”, no different than the model attempted by the french and russian revolutions. the “liberal” embraces islam because it also wants to destroy the christian western world, but they don’t realize that after islam shoves christian principles out of the culture, the liberals will be neatly lined up in orange jump suits to have their heads removed unless they pledge their souls to to satan (ie allah)
- cmh
  
  yes
Rick Smith

I guess we can add him to the list of, limp dick dhimmi cowards.
NEVER FORGET!!!!!

Zuckeberg, a wussy from Ardsley, NY who got lucky creating a social link that means little!!
Tyrehl Byk

Finally, a reasonable argument http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/arts/la-et-cm-knight-texas-shooting-20150505-column.html#page=1
- Timshel54
  
  How is that a reasonable argument?
  - Rick Smith
    
    Yeah. Notice “two people were killed”. Not “two Islamic terrorists” were killed. Says so much.
    - Tyrehl Byk
      
      Actually, it really doesn’t say anything other than what is necessary. Is not the concept represented by the words “Islamic terrorists” fully contained within the concept represented by the word “people”? See: “Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology” by Ayn Rand
      - Skirts & Daggers
        
        you are a f’n idiot. it DOES matter that islamic terrorists is added into the description because they are after ALL OF US.
        and no ‘people’ does not represent truth because ‘people’ in general are not out to kill you for the things you do that offend them.
        
        gawd. i hate ignorant fools.
      - Kdo
        
        You need to read Rand’s book again.
        Twice.
      - Kdo
        
        And for a clue, I’d refer you to the section on the Conceptual Common Denominator and the CONTEXT of what you describe as “necessary” to the discussion of the issue at hand.
      - Rick Smith
        
        Well guess what IS necessary? Reminding the readers that it… wasn’t…. two people, but, two murderous barbaric savage Islamic terrorist scum. Sorry, I know by saying that, it must upset you. And the omission of that tells that it wasn’t really an important fact for the author in the story, when it was one of the most important facts and should have been addressed that way at every opportunity.
      - RalphB
        
        “Two people were killed.” According to our budding Objectivist epistemologist Tyrehl Byk, this conveys the same concept as “two terrorists were killed” since terrorists are (were) people.
        
        Try this one on for size:
        
        Tyrehl Byk’s argument in favor of an opinion piece was an example of the right to do something really stupid. Byk knew that his opinion would outrage Geller’s supporters, but what did he care?
        
        “Now two people are dead. In other news…”
        
        Which two people are dead, Tyrehl?
        
        Was it Tyrhel and his best friend who were hacked to pieces by a mob of outraged Geller supporters? Or was it a pair of outraged Geller supporters shot by a security guard after they entered the premises wielding machetes?
        
        As Hillary said, “…people are dead… What difference – at this point, what difference does it make?”
        
        In epistemological terms, what this attitude conveys is not that when forming a wider concept we omit specifying the different particulars that distinguish subclasses of the concept but that concepts have no subclasses. A person is a person and there are no subclasses, for example moral ones like “innocent” and “guilty.” On this view, there can be no moral distinctions made between people irrespective of the particulars of a situation. If a members of Boko Haram rape and kill innocent school girls but one manages to put a claw hammer though a rapist’s skull and kills him, his death is just as tragic or laughable or meaningless as that of the girls. Since they are all subsumed under the concept “person” nothing more need be said.
        
        Tell me something, Tyrehl. Who stands to benefit more from your new-fangled epistemology, the innocent or the guilty?
        
        This is exactly what Pam Geller is talking about when she attacks the moral inversions of our age.
        
        You want an quote from Rand’s epistemology that really fits the situation? Read it and weep:
        
        “In the process of determining conceptual classification, neither the essential similarities nor the essential differences among existents may be ignored, evaded or omitted once they have been observed. Just as the requirements of cognition forbid the arbitrary subdivision of concepts, so they forbid the arbitrary integration of concepts into a wider concept by means of obliterating their essential differences—which is an error (or falsification) proceeding from definitions by non-essentials. (This is the method involved in the obliteration of valid concepts by means of ‘anti-concepts.’)” — Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology, 2nd Ed., p. 71
      - Lacouray Too
        
        Saying two goat lovers would have cleared it up even better.
  - Tyrehl Byk
    
    I would think that if you think that it is not, then you would challenge the original argument in places you think it is weak, rather than challenge me to restate the obvious.
    - Timshel54
      
      Oh…I see. Restate the obvious – Uh huh.
      
      About Geller he writes –
      
      is a staunch supporter of the cherished American freedom to do something stupid.The former Manhattan socialite proves it almost any time she opens her mouth,…
      
      That’s “reasonable” is it? The writer first suggests the 1st amendment a “cherished American freedom” are in his words, a reason to do something “stupid” – Then he goes on to say that Geller is stupid as well, whenever… “she opens her mouth”. Oh how nice.
      But wait, it gets better – Let’s mock her!
      
      Geller decided that their conference was mistaken — that more negative depictions of Islam, not fewer, were needed.
      
      Oh oh. Stop the presses!!! The writer says the Southern Poverty Law Center doesn’t approve!!!
      
      Who looks good in this mess? Not Geller, whoseAFDI is recognized as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center,…
      
      You know what? I could go on – but why do I get the feeling I’m wasting my time with you? Is it possible you haven’t read the article?
      Either that or you’re a troll. Perhaps both.
      - Rick Smith
        
        “Either that or you’re a troll”
        
        Yup, just another leftist limp dick dhimmi stooge
- Marlboro Man
  
  No, that was not a reasonable argument. It was drivel written by an un-American libtard.
  If you think that was a reasonable argument then you too are an un-American libtard.
cmh

what exactly was posted that caused removal?
- cmh
  
  and Pam is on fb…what is up with fb?
barry soetoro

Tasty.
Saul Sales Diaz

It’s funny how in the photo you can actually see Geert Wilders, a far-right wing leader and activist in the Netherlands, here in Europe. I don’t like “freedom lovers” that are accompanied by neofascist thugs. Don’t like them at all. Despite that, I totally agree that it is effed up to see all these people condemning “hate speech” when there is never such thing as that, but a free manifestation of people’s opinion. Free expression, whether it is for good or bad, is free expression and that must not be limited by concepts such as blasphemy. At the end of the day, in a free society, you gotta be able to offend each other #JeSuisCharlie
- Nadia Bizness
  
  Actually, fascism (neo or otherwise) moved in with the Left and is busy making bastard children…Dhimmitude, speech zones, etc.
- Tyrehl Byk
  
  Why should The Good, be defined as the ability to offend
  anyone at any time, for whatever reason a person’s ego demands it?
  - JacktheRipper
    
    That really is a loaded question. No infidel has said that was their mission, to promote the idea that people should have the “ability to offend anyone at any time…” But ironically, Islam comes close to doing just that, with their brutal sharia and jihad ambitions. So maybe you should be debating with them? And even if Pam was the most egotistical humanitarian on the planet, that still would not take away from her good intentions, which is to expose the antisemitism and jihad aggression within islam.
  - Kdo
    
    And now, reading this comment of yours, I’m led to believe that you are a troll attempting (in your other comment below) to discredit Ayn Rand’s work by citing her absolutely incorrectly.
  - http://batman-news.com albeit
    
    Did Jesus offend anyone when he walked the earth two thousand years ago?
  - Saul Sales Diaz
    
    Cause that is what free speech is all about
GOUSA1

FACEBOOK AIDS OBAMA WAR CRIMES COVER-UP
http://www.adamvstheman.com/facebook-aids-obama-in-war-crimes-cover-up/#.VUufjyFVhBc http://www.adamvstheman.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/FOR-WAR-300×168.jpg
JacktheRipper

So is Facebook some kind of sharia enforcer now? What is it that compels these people and organizations to so quickly abandon our principle of free speech? These dhimmis are making it harder for the rest of us that actually care about our liberties and country. Anything to protect the bottom line, I guess. I suppose when you are a potentate like Zuckerberg you don’t have to respect your nation’s ideals and freedoms. You can just sit upon your throne and eat bon bons while you wave your hand like a king, “Off with his head! His cartoons suit me not!” ha! I’d rather be poor than a billionaire without a soul, without a conscience.

“Only those with a conscience can find an action unconscionable.” ― F.D. Crandall

Facebook is a sellout dhimmi. They have closed the castle gate to freedom and raised the flag of religious tyranny. One good thing, they don’t have to worry about protecting a good reputation, they don’t have one.
- JacktheRipper
  
  They banned me too for my religious comments. I hate Facebook. Stay away from them, don’t give them your personal info. You only make it easier for big brother to spy on you.
  - Mark
    
    Gee I have posted a few lot of religious comments too. I wonder if I’ll get banned.
    - JacktheRipper
      
      Only if they’re truthful. ;)
- Tyrehl Byk
  
  Actually, Facebook has every right to control anything and
  everything within its platform, just as you have every right not to
  participate.
  
  Facebook is Zuckerberg’s stage, not yours, even as much as some of the
  users seem willing to delude their misguided egos into believing otherwise.
  - JacktheRipper
    
    Never said he didn’t have the “right,” go back and read what I said. Having the “right” doesn’t always mean you’re doing the right thing.
    - Tyrehl Byk
      
      I agree. What’s your point?
      - JacktheRipper
        
        Well the point is, our freedoms are getting hocked for islam’s ignorance and barbarity. One by one our leaders, the media, our social movers, are capitulating to islamic intimidation. And I find that deeply troubling…don’t you?
      - Tyrehl Byk
        
        Not at all, Jack, because I don’t grant your premise, which
        could easily be seen as being formed by a reliance on Ms. Geller’s non-reflective instant gratification of emotion, rather than a contemplative review of the eccentricities
        of a current event.
        
        I can sympathize with Ms. Geller’s initial motivations that
        began after 911, however that initial motivation has devolved over the years to the point that I now see her as being ruled by emotions, and trapped in a cul-de-sac
        of her own self-righteousness, rather than an advocate of the type of reasoning that Ayn Rand would have exhibited, and which Ms. Geller lays claim to.
        
        At this moment in time, Ms. Geller is not a person that can
        be trusted to speak the truth on any matter since she is self-declared as being at war.
      - JacktheRipper
        
        Not at all, Jack, because I don’t grant your premise, which could easily be seen as being formed by a reliance on Ms. Geller’s non-reflective instant gratification of emotion, rather than a contemplative review of the eccentricities of a current event.
        
        No, I heartily disagree. My premise is not formed by a reliance on Ms. Geller’s non-reflective instant gratification of emotion… it is instead based on a contemplative review of the terror that islam is causing around the world, including the genocidal slaughter of our own citizens. Nowhere in her argument do I see a desire for instant gratification of emotion. Instead I see an intelligent woman presenting a reasoned argument against islamic jihad, sharia abuse, and antisemitism. You are entitled to disagree, but I doubt you’ll garner much respect from rational thinking people.
        
        I can sympathize with Ms. Geller’s initial motivations that began after 911, however that initial motivation has devolved over the years to the point that I now see her as being ruled by emotions, and trapped in a cul-de-sac of her own self-righteousness…
        
        Well, I disagree with your observation. If you could give me specific examples of how her ruling “emotions” somehow denigrate the logic and good intentions of her work then I might agree. Until you do that, I will continue to see the same good woman I’ve always seen, brilliant, dedicated, patriotic, hard-working, compassionate, a good example for young people and those that love freedom. Sorry if my observation is so different from yours. Maybe my sight is better.
        
        At this moment in time, Ms. Geller is not a person that can be trusted to speak the truth on any matter since she is self-declared as being at war.
        
        Oh, I didn’t know Pam couldn’t be trusted, that’s news to me. I’m surprised you didn’t offer examples right here and now. It would have done much to help your argument. By all means, get back to us with all those untruths she has used to shed light on antisemitism, the murder of Christians, the persecution of innocents for jihad, oppression under sharia, and the infringement of our freedoms by islamic intimidation. It will be interesting to see how someone like you, a paltry pseudo-intellect, can take down an icon of freedom.
      - Msw3681 sw
        
        You really are a complete twat.
      - William Shuffield
        
        Because people who declare a war for liberty always lie? Eloquent rubbish is only rubbish in a fancy trash bag
      - will winn
        
        the media is self censoring for Islamic terrorists. does pam Gellar have to also?
      - JohnSmith
        
        Just like in the EU “nations!”
      - http://batman-news.com albeit
        
        Terribly troubling! And worse than that many out there think that Muslims and Christianity worship the same god!! Uh…I can’t believe the masses are that gullible but considering the POS president we elected into the white house twice now well we are in deep do do!!!!
    - Amirite
      
      Wait back up for a sec…. Did you say having the RIGHT doesn’t always mean you’re doing the RIGHT thing? Maybe just maybe like the idea of holding a whole Muhammad drawing contest because you can? Providing nothing constructive to society whatsoever.. Other than something the media can use to distract inbreeders and morons.
      - JacktheRipper
        
        Maybe just maybe like the idea of holding a whole Muhammad drawing
        contest because you can? Providing nothing constructive to society
        whatsoever..
        
        You make it sound like our right to free express with cartoons is some kind of provocation. As if this were an egregious crime against someone, to draw fanciful pics of a man nobody has ever seen or can describe. You are perverting the moral responsibility from the violent aggressors onto the legal and non-violent cartoonists. The moral responsibility lay solely on those making a demand that we couldn’t comply with even if we wanted to. It’s a delusion, a madness on their part, a manufactured affront against their religion. They are telling us we can’t draw imaginary pictures of an imaginary face. There’s no just cause for offense in that, they’re just looking for a fight–a JIHAD fight.
        
        And why didn’t you use your DISQUS handle? I know it’s you. Chicken.
      - DM
        
        WELL SAID!!!
      - IzlamIsTyranny
        
        Because izlamic-nazi blasphemy and heresy laws are always wrong, no matter how you try to dress them up.
  - will winn
    
    tyrehl byk -deleted for standing up to censorship. what a crime. must be sharia law
- JohnSmith
  
  Who will Zuckerberg turn to when the Moslems come for him? Don’t ask “Homeland Security”, whose leader, Jeh Johnson, is concerned about “The plight of Moslems!”
  - Stu Cozza
    
    WTF is a “Jeh”, anyway?
  - DM
    
    7th century savage will walk among us because our FBI & DHS have decided that enemies both foreign and domestic must at all cost be protected form We The People. We will have to be ready to protect ourselves. This situation is not going to change anytime soon.
Fromafar

Yet Mr. Zuckerberg doesn’t seem to chase the Jihadis very effectively, does he?…..
Another Kappo? Most likely….
Capitalist Jew

Waaaa waaa waaa: You got kicked off of Facebook. Buck up Bosch, it’s called the Free market and Facebook can do whatever they wish. It’s not your Constitutional right to be on Facebook, it’s a PRIVILEGE! So pick yourself from your bootstrap and leave the sandbox. Think Facebook supports Sharia Law? Ha! Mark Zuckerberg is a billionaire Jew and his form of capitalism goes counter to the Muslim belief.

Bosch Fawstin
Bosch Fawstin
Bosch FawstinIt’s called the Free market
- Rick Smith
  
  Well I’m sure ISIS is proud of dhimmi Fuckerberg for his removal. And that’s their right too.
http://lifeisbeautifulallthetime.blogspot.com/ Moishe3rd

I searched Facebook, and went to his page. About 5 minutes ago. He appears to still exist.
https://twitter.com/Moirraines Moirrainefortruth

https://www.facebook.com/bosch.fawstin

Now I am seriously wondering what, if anything, is EVER vetted BY THIS WEBSITE and its owners.

I just went to the above website… no mention of being tossed from FB and I can see it without any machinations.
- Mark Phukerberg
  
  Maybe he has been locked out of Fraudbook, but they didn’t take down his page?
- Dirk
  
  Did you see his post, “I’m back”? Maybe you should read his page first.
1565 AD

Mark Zuckerberg, another self-loathing Jew. An anti-American, free speech hating lefty. May Facebook collapse be another MySpace.
- JohnSmith
  
  WELL SAID.
- Sickofliberallies
  
  Took the words out of my mouth..literally! Well done!
lostlegends

Bosch is more famous now than ever. The man is out of the book. Bugger Facebook.
426 HemiCuda

https://thatguynoman.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/facebook_sucks.jpg
Theodorick C

PRESERVE Freedom Of Speech!

DRAW The Vile “Prophet” Muhammad

https://drawthevileprophet.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/preserve-free-speech-draw-the-vile-prophet-400dpi.jpg
Theodorick C

If everybody who wants to preserve our most precious possession, freedom of speech, were to post a “Prophet” Muhammad cartoon on their facebook pages, do you think facebook would throw away such a large number of pages? Of course not. WE outnumber the Islamites by far. Let’s take advantage of it and show facebook that their idiocy will come at a cost. Let’s everyone say I AM BOSCH FAWSTIN and act accordingly!
Lord Paper Clip

Just checked Bosch Fawstin on FB. Seems OK.
Jerry Jansen

funny, i just went to his facebook page without a problem
- Jerry Jansen
  
  https://www.facebook.com/bosch.fawstin?fref=ts
- RCCA
  
  me too
LD McClellan

Put him back on Zuckerberg and stop being a brain-dead totalitarian tyrant. What if you were in Mr. Fawstin’s place? Would you want him doing you this way? What’s wrong with you boy? No sense of right and wrong?
- https://twitter.com/Moirraines Moirrainefortruth
  
  Zuckerburg’s parents are at fault.
  
  If you read and understand that the Bible is literally a “How Not To or How to Screw Up Your Life” manual, you will see that parents are responsible for their children’s attitudes AND it states very clearly in Proverbs 22 which I hereby rename TRUISMS THAT HUMANITY IGNORES.
  
  Verse six isn’t the only one humans have been given a “hint” on how to go about becoming the good and moral people we once were and can be again.
  
  Verse Six is why we are in serious trouble.
  
  The ignorant who can’t discern its meaning are destroying our nation – not a piece at a time, but one child to adult mind at a time.
  
  Rather than “old” as the verse says, let’s TRANSLATE for the VERY IGNORANT here who can’t figure out what this word means in that verse.
  
  Translation:
  
  When one is OLD ENOUGH to LEAVE HEARTH AND HOME; OLD ENOUGH TO BE A DANGER OR A BLESSING TO HIS/HER FAMILY; WHEN ONE IS OLD ENOUGH BY LAW TO MAKE DECISIONS AND IN OUR CASE ITS 18 OR IN SOME RARE CASES EVEN 16 EXCEPT TO VOTE; OLD – AS IN NOT A CHILD ANY LONGER – WHEN ANY PERSON IS “OLD” AS IN NOT IN ANOTHER ADULT’S CARE, THEY CAN BE GOOD PEOPLE OR BAD PEOPLE BECAUSE OF THE TEACHINGS OF THEIR BLESSED OR CURSED PARENTS WHO GIVE THEM BLESSINGS OR CURSING DEPENDING ON THEIR TAKE ON THE WORLD AND THEIR CARE OF IT AND THEIR FELLOW MAN.
  
  And insane number of Americans are ignorant toddlers who use their adult bodies with immature thought processes, selfish desires and destructive behaviors to destroy their neighbors and families.
  
  1 A good name is rather to be chosen than great riches, and loving favor rather than silver and gold.
  
  2 The rich and poor meet together: the LORD is the maker of them all.
  
  3 A prudent man foreseeth the evil, and hideth himself: but the simple pass on, and are punished.
  
  4 By humility and the fear of the LORD are riches, and honour, and life.
  
  5 Thorns and snares are in the way of the froward: he that doth keep his soul shall be far from them.
  
  6 Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it.
  
  7 The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.
  
  8 He that soweth iniquity shall reap vanity: and the rod of his anger shall fail.
  
  9 He that hath a bountiful eye shall be blessed; for he giveth of his bread to the poor.
  
  10 Cast out the scorner, and contention shall go out; yea, strife and reproach shall cease.
  
  11 He that loveth pureness of heart, for the grace of his lips the king shall be his friend.
  
  12 The eyes of the LORD preserve knowledge, and he overthroweth the words of the transgressor.
  
  13 The slothful man saith, There is a lion without, I shall be slain in the streets.
  
  14 The mouth of strange women is a deep pit: he that is abhorred of the LORD shall fall therein.
  
  15Foolishness is bound in the heart of a child; but the rod of correction shall drive it far from him.
  
  16He that oppresseth the poor to increase his riches, and he that giveth to the rich, shall surely come to want.
  
  17 Bow down thine ear, and hear the words of the wise, and apply thine heart unto my knowledge.
  
  18 For it is a pleasant thing if thou keep them within thee; they shall withal be fitted in thy lips.
  
  19 That thy trust may be in the LORD, I have made known to thee this day, even to thee.
  
  20 Have not I written to thee excellent things in counsels and knowledge,
  
  21 That I might make thee know the certainty of the words of truth; that thou mightest answer the words of truth to them that send unto thee?
  
  22Rob not the poor, because he is poor: neither oppress the afflicted in the gate:
  
  23 For the LORD will plead their cause, and spoil the soul of those that spoiled them.
  
  24 Make no friendship with an angry man; and with a furious man thou shalt not go:
  
  25 Lest thou learn his ways, and get a snare to thy soul.
  
  26 Be not thou one of them that strike hands, or of them that are sureties for debts.
  
  27 If thou hast nothing to pay, why should he take away thy bed from under thee?
  
  28 Remove not the ancient landmark, which thy fathers have set.
  
  29 Seest thou a man diligent in his business? he shall stand before kings; he shall not stand before mean men.
https://twitter.com/Moirraines Moirrainefortruth

If you read and understand that the Bible is literally a “How Not To or How to Screw Up Your Life” manual, you will see that parents are responsible for their children’s attitudes AND it states very clearly in Proverbs 22 which I hereby rename TRUISMS THAT HUMANITY IGNORES.

Verse six isn’t the only one humans have been given a “hint” on how to go about becoming the good and moral people we once were and can be again.

Verse Six is why we are in serious trouble.

The ignorant who can’t discern its meaning are destroying our nation – not a piece at a time, but one child to adult mind at a time.

Rather than “old” as the verse says, let’s TRANSLATE for the VERY IGNORANT here who can’t figure out what this word means in that verse.

Translation:

When one is OLD ENOUGH to LEAVE HEARTH AND HOME; OLD ENOUGH TO BE A DANGER OR A BLESSING TO HIS/HER FAMILY; WHEN ONE IS OLD ENOUGH BY LAW TO MAKE DECISIONS AND IN OUR CASE ITS 18 OR IN SOME RARE CASES EVEN 16 EXCEPT TO VOTE; OLD – AS IN NOT A CHILD ANY LONGER – WHEN ANY PERSON IS “OLD” AS IN NOT IN ANOTHER ADULT’S CARE, THEY CAN BE GOOD PEOPLE OR BAD PEOPLE BECAUSE OF THE TEACHINGS OF THEIR BLESSED OR CURSED PARENTS WHO GIVE THEM BLESSINGS OR CURSING DEPENDING ON THEIR TAKE ON THE WORLD AND THEIR CARE OF IT AND THEIR FELLOW MAN.

An insane number of Americans are ignorant toddlers who use their adult bodies with immature thought processes, selfish desires and destructive behaviors to destroy their neighbors and families.

Dangerous part about that? Many of them call themselves our “leaders” and our “administrators”.

Fraud is not built into the American system – the Constitutions both states and federal are being abused.

1 A good name is rather to be chosen than great riches, and loving favor rather than silver and gold.

2 The rich and poor meet together: the LORD is the maker of them all.

3 A prudent man foreseeth the evil, and hideth himself: but the simple pass on, and are punished.

4 By humility and the fear of the LORD are riches, and honour, and life.

5 Thorns and snares are in the way of the froward: he that doth keep his soul shall be far from them.

6 Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it.

7 The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.

8 He that soweth iniquity shall reap vanity: and the rod of his anger shall fail.

9 He that hath a bountiful eye shall be blessed; for he giveth of his bread to the poor.

10 Cast out the scorner, and contention shall go out; yea, strife and reproach shall cease.

11 He that loveth pureness of heart, for the grace of his lips the king shall be his friend.

12 The eyes of the LORD preserve knowledge, and he overthroweth the words of the transgressor.

13 The slothful man saith, There is a lion without, I shall be slain in the streets.

14 The mouth of strange women is a deep pit: he that is abhorred of the LORD shall fall therein.

15Foolishness is bound in the heart of a child; but the rod of correction shall drive it far from him.

16He that oppresseth the poor to increase his riches, and he that giveth to the rich, shall surely come to want.

17 Bow down thine ear, and hear the words of the wise, and apply thine heart unto my knowledge.

18 For it is a pleasant thing if thou keep them within thee; they shall withal be fitted in thy lips.

19 That thy trust may be in the LORD, I have made known to thee this day, even to thee.

20 Have not I written to thee excellent things in counsels and knowledge,

21 That I might make thee know the certainty of the words of truth; that thou mightest answer the words of truth to them that send unto thee?

22Rob not the poor, because he is poor: neither oppress the afflicted in the gate:

23 For the LORD will plead their cause, and spoil the soul of those that spoiled them.

24 Make no friendship with an angry man; and with a furious man thou shalt not go:

25 Lest thou learn his ways, and get a snare to thy soul.

26 Be not thou one of them that strike hands, or of them that are sureties for debts.

27 If thou hast nothing to pay, why should he take away thy bed from under thee?

28 Remove not the ancient landmark, which thy fathers have set.

29 Seest thou a man diligent in his business? he shall stand before kings; he shall not stand before mean men.
Mike_W20

The Eloi and the Morlocks.
Robert Leahy

His page is up now.
DM

If you don’t use it (Freedom) you don’t have it.

Mocking political or religious or even sexual beliefs is expressing opinion or fact. If you do not like the opinion or fact, ignore it and express your own. I am so sick and tired of all this BS about not saying what your think or believe because someone is offended. I have read the CONSTITUTION repeatedly and find no portion that gives me or anyone the freedom from being offended. If anyone finds it let me know. Our CONSTITUTION innumerate our God Given Freedoms, it does not grant us safe passage thru life or freedom from offense or hardship, nor does it invest our govt with providing us with anything of the sort.

DO NOT SUBMIT! REPUBLISH the Mohammed CARTOONS EVERYWHERE.
Here’s How.
http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=2043