あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]NonaSuomi282 -27 ポイント-26 ポイント  (32子コメント)

I like how they trot out the old "1st amendment doesn't apply to non-government entities" but totally shot themselves in the foot by trying to fancy it up by rewording it. Censorship is censorship, whether or not it's done by the government or a private company. It's just not constitutionally forbidden unless the government is doing it (in most cases).

EDIT- forgot to toe the line, sorry guys! I'll make sure to bring extra lube and less original thought for the next jerk!

[–]grandhighwonko 27 ポイント28 ポイント  (16子コメント)

I do not agree that a store refusing to sell something is censorship. For example, my local bookshop doesn't stock bicycle parts. They're not censoring bicycle parts makers.

[–]DrRamoray 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (13子コメント)

Censorship is censorship, whether or not it's done by the government or a private company.

Can you explain why forcing a "private company" to be a platform for your own free speech isn't trampling on their freedoms?

I see this attitude a lot, people feel they're entitled to the services provided by other individuals. Is it a side effect of globalization and corporatism? People depend less and less on their own government and more and more on a network of private firms, sometimes working internationally, that they just expect these firms to give them the same rights as a government?

[–]Intortoise 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Okay so everything is censorship good work. Nobody should be allowed to make decisions anymore because censorship boogeyman is here.