あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]jphamlore 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (11子コメント)

No one has given Gavin Andresen the type of authority over the project that Linus Torvalds has over Linux, by design.

The bigger decision it seems to me is whether there will be a formal voting system. I suspect if one isn't created, a hard fork will be politically impossible. That is why in more formal voting systems there are clear rules about how to submit a proposal to qualify for a vote, who is eligible to vote, and what consensus level is required for a proposal to pass.

[–]mike_hearnMike Hearn - Bitcoin Expert 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (7子コメント)

No one has given Gavin Andresen the type of authority over the project that Linus Torvalds has over Linux, by design

Actually, Satoshi put Gavin in charge before he left.

[–]imemymind 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (2子コメント)

proof of this?

[–]BobAlison[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

This seems to have been the handoff announcement by Gavin:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2367.0;all

I'm not sure if Satoshi was still around at the time, but if he made posts after this message, it would seem to confirm Gavin's statement.

[–]nullcGreg Maxwell - Bitcoin Expert 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Sure; "I'm doing more active project management" isn't how most would interpret "Put Gavin in charge"; and Gavin stepped out of doing project management some time ago.

[–]nullcGreg Maxwell - Bitcoin Expert 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (1子コメント)

This is not correct.

[–]marcus_of_augustus 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's close to an outright lie Mike, just stop it already.

[–]smartfbrankings 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

That still doesn't equal Linus's authority.

[–]descartablet 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

We have a voting system, we call it proof of work and in my opinion it is even better than democracy

[–]andyd00d 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

SHA256 isn't very good at analytical thinking.

[–]frrrni -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I wonder if miners could vote with mining power.