全 110 件のコメント

[–]krrt 40 ポイント41 ポイント  (25子コメント)

Brooker said that Cameron, Miliband and Clegg were all “cover versions” of Tony Blair “to varying extents,” but that Farage was like “a flipping slightly pissed-up sort of brother in law or something. He’s like somebody else’s uncle at a wedding that corners you and starts banging on about immigration."

[–]hoffi_coffi 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Even reporting the bare facts of what he or a UKIP candidate said can draw anger from the UKIP faithful as "biased" so yes, it is impossible. Leave him out - they are biased in favour of established parties. Include him - they are making him look bad.

[–]GaryTheTallGuy [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I disagree. As long as what he says isn't presented as factual instead of opinion and opponents are given an equal platform to express their beliefs then how is that breaking impartiality rules?

I'd argue more that UKIP got way more attention than they deserved when they were only polling at around 10-15% but the reporting wasn't in and of itself breaking impartiality rules

[–]I_like_uk_a_little -3 ポイント-2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Basically what we're trying to say is something sarcastic. And say it as sarcastically as we can. Say it sarcastically and that way people kind of think it's funny because if we can't be sarcastic what can we be? And it's better to be sarcastic about things like immigration because that way we are being impartial and everyone knows impartiality is the best friend of not actually giving a fuck.