if you think this is just about "ethics in journalism", YOU'RE the one who has it wrong.
- this is about a defense of our hobby against RAD FEM/SJWs and their pernicious attempt to infiltrate all kinds of areas of interest with their fucking politics.
THIS is the right answer.
"ethics in journalism" is fucking NOT.
read the subreddit with MY definition and everything makes fucking sense.
read the subreddit with YOURS and what is stated in our pussyfooting goddamn joke of a mission statement and the subreddit is NOT UNDERSTANDABLE.
again, my question for you is why so fucking timid? fucking embrace what we ACTUALLY ARE instead of trying to be so fucking narrow as to be completely inconsequential.
sorry if i come off as angry but it does make me angry that a group that's supposed to be about courage is so fucking milquetoast when it comes to the essential mission definition.
sarkeesian is NOT about ethics in game journalism.
quinn is NOT about ethics in game journalism.
based mom and milo are not about ethics in game journalism.
at the same time, UVA is not about games. Shirtgate is not about games. Sad Puppies in not about games.
BUT THESE
ALL
fucking belong here.
again, i challenge you. read the subreddit with my definition as what guides us vs. your definition. what makes sense? what has ALWAYS made sense?
the fact that you don't get this, that it's not completely OBVIOUS to you... such that you would make a post like this one... frustrates me to no fucking end.