jump to content
my subreddits
more »
want to join? sign in or create an account in seconds|
[-]
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
subreddit:subreddit
find submissions in "subreddit"
author:username
find submissions by "username"
site:example.com
find submissions from "example.com"
url:text
search for "text" in url
selftext:text
search for "text" in self post contents
self:yes (or self:no)
include (or exclude) self posts
nsfw:yes (or nsfw:no)
include (or exclude) results marked as NSFW
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
this post was submitted on
34 points (85% upvoted)
shortlink:
reset password

KotakuInAction

subscribeunsubscribe34,321 ethical violations readers
792 Navy SeaLions here, kiddo users here now

KiA Hub | ON-TOPIC KiA | DRAMA-FREE KiA | #SPJEthicsWeek | HBB LEGAL FUND | VOAT

Just getting up to speed with GamerGate?
KotakuInAction is the place to discuss the gaming community, gaming journalism, and issues in the gaming industry. If you're more into general vidya discussion, check out /r/neogaming. For the full KiA experience, visit the KiA Hub multireddit.
Note: Our Automoderator is configured to delete all posts by accounts less than three days old.

OUR MISSION

We believe that the current standard of ethics in the gaming industry is unhealthy to itself, and to gamers. We have taken notice to various conflicts of interest, and wish to address these in hopes that the gaming industry can change, in order to retain the trust of its concerned consumers.
We believe gaming is an inclusive place, and wish to welcome all who want to take part in an amazing hobby. We welcome artistic freedom and equal opportunities for creators and creations. We condemn censorship, exclusion, harassment, and abuse.
This is a community for discussion of these issues, and for organizing campaigns for reform, so that the industry can be held accountable for its actions and gamers can enjoy their medium without being unjustly attacked or slandered.
KiA Affiliates Friends
/r/KiAChatroom /r/WikiInAction
/r/KiACirclejerk /r/ShitGhaziSays
/r/NotYourShieldProject /r/neogaming
/r/WerthamInAction /r/GamesNews

RULES:

  1. Don't be a dickwolf.
  2. Posting personal information on anybody ("doxing") is not allowed.
  3. Do not post in bad faith.
  4. Direct links to other posts on Reddit, including NP (No Participation) links, are not allowed.
  5. Brigading, aggressive dogpiling, inciting witch hunts, or any call-to-arms posts against other users or subreddits is strictly prohibited.
  6. Archive links where possible.
  7. Seek verification for posts with major claims.
  8. No reposts.
  9. No memes as OP.
  10. Link shorteners will be approved only by moderator discretion.
  11. Reddit politics unrelated to gaming and/or GamerGate doesn't go here.
  12. Tag your posts appropriately (ex. [Drama], with the brackets) so they may be given the proper flair.
REMINDER: BASIC REDDIT RULES APPLY. DO NOT POST ANY ILLEGAL CONTENT.
If you have any questions or concerns, please message the moderators before private messaging an individual moderator.
created by david-mea community for
No problem. We won't show you that ad again. Why didn't you like it?
Oops! I didn't mean to do this.
message the moderators

MODERATORS

33
34
35
you are viewing a single comment's thread.
[–]GOU_NoMoreMrNiceGuy 1 point2 points3 points  (0 children)
i have always said that the focus on gaming journalism is a tunnel vision that does not jibe with what the community actually cares about - in the entirety of its existence. and i've said that the mission statement is flat out wrong and flawed as it does not specifically identify and call out our EXPLICIT ENEMIES: RAD FEM/SJWs.
IN EVERY CONTEXT in which we have a beef with someone, they are rad fem/sjws... so why not fucking embrace that and be honest in a way that we always criticize others for lacking.
anita sarkisian is not essentially about gaming journalism.
neither is zoe quinn with the attendant blackout of discussion.
again - our enemies are the rad fem/sjws and to ban from the conversation things like UVA rape bullshit from rolling stone or shirtgate or sad puppies is to WEAKEN the community and our fight against a COMMON ENEMY.
but as i've come to learn, there's no essential good and integrity in ANY group... everyone has weaknesses and blinders that pisses me off. so if you guys make this so strict as to restrict the conversation to "gaming journalism", i'm out.
when schreier called us out for featuring a lot of talk against SJW shit and calling us inconsistent for not saying so - he was fucking right for a change.
and again, i'm speaking as a rational liberal who can see where the lines of battle are and who our enemies are.
you guys can't fight a war in which you show up at a precisely demarcated battlefield while IGNORING THE IDENTITY OF THE ENEMIES for fuck's sake.
srsly, this pisses me off no end - wtf is wrong with you guys who have made the mission statement so that you don't see this? like i want a fucking answer... wtf?
missing the forest for the trees barely fucking covers it.
and rallying against an identified ENEMY is one of the most powerful psychological weapons an army can have... why the fuck are you trying to nerf that by keeping the struggle against that which is simply "unethical"?
anyway, as i said, i have been disabused of the notion of groups so do as you will.
but if you narrow the focus so that we are not allowed to discuss and call out our enemies. i'm out because then the movement has become completely fucking useless and not of interest to me and i would wager, not of interest to a great many here.
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. © 2015 reddit inc. All rights reserved.
REDDIT and the ALIEN Logo are registered trademarks of reddit inc.
π Rendered by PID 29063 on app-293 at 2015-05-04 02:37:09.659775+00:00 running f2e002a country code: DE.
0%
 
10%
 
20%
 
30%
 
40%
 
50%
 
60%
 
70%
 
80%
 
90%
 
100%