全 59 件のコメント

[–]Napalmenator 70 ポイント71 ポイント  (22子コメント)

You were not fired for your gender. You were fired for using company computers to look up personal and not work appropriate things. Perfectly legal. Learn to keep your personal life personal and find a new job

[–]aluben_x 62 ポイント63 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Are you going to keep downvoting every answer in this thread that is not "oh yeah totally sue them?" I would suggest not using company time to browse "totally not anti-women" websites unless that is part of your job description. Also, /r/justneckbeardthings.

[–]SagittariaKnows 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (1子コメント)

The answer to your first question will be yes.

Apparently OP is just as triggered by this situation as the feminazis who fired him - for screwing around on non work related websites and tweeting while at work.

[–]aluben_x 24 ポイント25 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm just surprised an alpha like OP would let a woman talk to him like that. What is she doing being a CEO anyway?

[–]SagittariaKnows 37 ポイント38 ポイント  (13子コメント)

Did they fire all the men just for being men? Or were you fired for something you said or did?

It's twitter. Not tweeter.

You can file for unemployment - be prepared for them to contest it.

[–]a_kam 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I legitimately thought Tweeter was some new social media thing that I didn't know about because I am lame. I feel better now.

[–]Jessica_Ariadne 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Sounds like what they use in Cities: Skylines.

[–]lucysalvatierra 16 ポイント17 ポイント  (2子コメント)

That was driving me CRAZY!!!!!

[–]SagittariaKnows 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (1子コメント)

If someone isn't talking about a speaker? The term tweeter makes me think of some kind of meth head version of the twitter logo. The bluebird becomes Tweety on drugs.

[–]lucysalvatierra 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The way he was talking about it made me think English is not his first language. Or he is really old.

[–]TotesMessenger 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (3子コメント)

This thread has been linked to from another place on reddit.

If you follow any of the above links, respect the rules of reddit and don't vote. (Info / Contact)

[–]theroyalalastor 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Man fired for browsing MRA sites, is this discrimination?

Let's not rely on the subreddit for legal advise, let's circlejerk about it instead

[–]gingervitis16 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Lol they're calling it a "false flag". That's some conspiratard shit if I've ever heard it.

[–]agentdcf 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The feds are planning to invade masculinity, just watch when all the alphas are rounded up as political prisoners. It'll be skirts and high heels for everyone then. RIP America.

[–]stumblepretty 31 ポイント32 ポイント  (9子コメント)

You weren't fired for being pro-men's rights, you were fired for hate speech. There's a difference. This isn't gender discrimination. More than that, I'd imagine that even if you did have a leg to stand on, you were doing non-work activities on company time and could be fired for that, as well.

You're not going to get unemployment for this.

[–]CujoCrunch 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You're not going to get unemployment for this.

What makes you say that?

[–]lawnerdcanada 16 ポイント17 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Is this discrimination?

Yes (but see below).

Can I get recourse to get rehired?

Absolutely not.

Is this legal?

Yes.

You worked for a private corporation. You're not entitled to due process. You're not entitled to equal protection vis-a-vis comparable use of work time by other employees. Neither federal nor Michigan law protects you from employment discrimination on the basis of political opinion. All of this "yeah but" stuff you're pulling out just doesn't matter.

[–]taterbizkit 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

recourse to get rehired?

Putting all other issues aside, generally, "no".

Sometimes, under a contract or collective bargaining agreement, the contract will specify terms for rehiring a wrongly terminated employee.

But if a judge tells a company "You have to rehire person X", then X engages in some other firable misconduct, the court has to get involved AGAIN, and now it has to decide whether both parties are acting in good faith. Courts don't like to do that (outside of family law and some government contract situations), so they won't order you back to work.

If you were wrongfully terminated, you would be entitled to unemployment benefits.

(I am making no statement one way or the other about the merits of your claim -- just answering the ancillary questions.)

[–]CannaK 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Men's rights are one thing. MGTOW is another thing. MGTOW is anti-women hate speech.

Also, you were doing non-company things on company time.

[–]Ahl93 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Wow OP, you got demolished, I almost actually feel bad for you.

Bend over, it's time for your red pill suppository.

[–]CujoCrunch 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

OP, see here (PDF warning) for an explanation of what type of misconduct would disqualify you from unemployment in MI. I think you'll win on appeal (if not the first time around) as long as you didn't have a series of conflicts over your MRA website usage at work.

if the actions by the worker show merely the worker’s inability to do the job correctly, or show an isolated case of bad judgment or negligence, then the worker will not be disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. (This does not necessarily mean the employer did not have a good reason for firing the worker.) Acts committed by the worker that have no connection with the work will not result in disqualification if the employer fires the worker for them.

Even if you read the MRA site everyday, it's not a "series" if they didn't warn you in between visits that you were committed an act "bad judgment" for which they'd fire you, etc.

[–]CujoCrunch 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

on a company computer on company time...why can't I have pro men's rights stuff on my computer?

Here's your big problem: it's not your computer.

I agree that mens' rights websites are not uniformly "hate speech" or whatever, but they probably can fire you for browsing them on company computers without facing a successful gender bias suit. Contact the EEOC if you'd like to file a complaint.

My female co-worker also visits the same websites for ideas for her tweeter posts and she didn't get fired.

That sucks, but I don't see how it change your situation in at-will employment. But your firing doesn't appear to involve gross misconduct, from what you've said. Gross misconduct is generally stealing, intentionally damaging the company, etc.

File for unemployment. If your first application is denied, appeal. It's common for contested unemployment applications to be denied the first time but the allowed on appeal. The appeals level general has more experienced employees who better understand nuances in unemployment rules.