Richard Carrier Blogs

Announcing appearances, publications, and occasional thoughts on natural philosophy and ancient history by philosopher, historian, and author Richard Carrier.

Looking for a Date Middle of May


Close up photo of Richard Carrier in a suit and tie, wearing his characteristic glasses, speaking at an event before a screen showing text, gesturing as he makes a point, in front of a podium microphone almost out of view to the left..So, this is experimental. I’d like to go on a date in May. And for the first time, I’m going to try a bat signal: putting a call out on my blog. I don’t know anyone else who has tried doing that, so I have no precedent to work from as to etiquette or even arguments for or against doing it. So I’m just going to do it and see what happens and document and assess. If you know anyone who might have an interest in dating me, let them know. If you might have an interest, read on.
  • I’ll start by making sure anyone considering this is up to speed. I am polyamorous. I currently have many girlfriends. All I consider my friends. Some are just occasional lovers. Some I am more involved with. They are also polyamorous, or near enough (not all of them identify that way, but all of them enjoy open relationships). And I will always have relationships with them, as long as they’ll have me in their life.
  • Many different things can be meant by the following terms, but just for the present purpose, if by a primary relationship is meant someone you live with or just about as good as live with, a secondary as someone you date regularly, and a tertiary as someone you date occasionally, all my relationships are tertiary, but only because of geography. I live just below Sacramento, California, where the rents are cheap, which means, where no one wants to live. And I’m unlikely to move anytime soon. So relationships with me, at best, are likely to be tertiary—long distance chatting with occasional being together throughout the year. Even so, I always take such friendships seriously.
  • In person I am always very frank and open about myself and my life and wishes and feelings, and I prefer people be that way with me, although I fully understand most people aren’t as fully comfortable doing that as I am.
  • I travel North America a lot. So far, particularly to Southern California and Ohio. But I range far and wide in my adventures.
The rest you can find out by googling me (along with your preferred keywords). Or checking out my body of writing (even the writings of my enemies). But really, my religious status is obvious. As are my politics. And social views. I’m 0.5 on the Kinsey scale. Not heavy into kink (but get along well with people who are). I have an unusual fetish or two but don’t expect any of my partners to share them. I’m pro sex worker, and though I personally find strip clubs and brothels uninteresting at best (uncomfortable at worst), I like partners who are or who have been sex workers. I also like women who have or pursue a lot of partners or who love to boast of their sexual exploits, especially over wine or whiskey or equivalent. I’m not going to get all butt-hurt or angsty over how high Your Number is. It very much has the opposite effect on me.
-:-
Okay. So if all that hasn’t scared you away, read on. Otherwise, #RCIPNFY. Richard Carrier is probably not for you.
This May I will be in the Los Angeles area. I shall be spending time with several of my girlfriends, and family. But there is a hole in my schedule due to a date having fallen through, and I’m looking for someone to go on a date with then. It requires your taking at least one day off work (if you work a regular week). I’ll be free between noon the Wednesday of May 13th to noon the Friday of May 15th.
Within that window I’m flexible, but here is the date I had in mind: I was originally going to take someone really excited by the opportunity to see the Dead Sea Scrolls, which are now on display at the California Science Center, and that is still my plan, especially as the same museum has the Endeavor, plus tons of other cool science stuff, from aerospace to biospace. We could definitely spend hours there if not a whole day.
I am also planning to have a hotel room, and am comfortable sharing it platonically. Certainly I would enjoy sharing it non-platonically, but I don’t expect it. I can’t believe (even though I know) there are still guys who assume the other shit buys them sex, thus necessitating I say this: if you are going to have sex with me, it has to be because it’s fun and you want to, not because it’s something you owe me. On the same understanding, if you have a place for me to crash in town (platonically or not), and are happy to have me over to spare me the cost of hiring a room, that would be lovely. And yes, if you are poly or open and live with a partner or two, I’m comfortable with that as well.
This also means you don’t have to live in the LA area to join me for this. If you can get to LA, and don’t mind sharing a room (at my expense), the opportunity remains.
But I can probably only fit one woman’s company into my visit. And just as for you I’m sure, I’m only likely to say yes to someone who sparks something for me, and that’s too subjective and idiosyncratic to predict or define. So for both reasons, please don’t take a no badly. But if you want to at least inquire, please message me on Facebook … or email if you are still that old school (hey, I can’t complain, I still have a flip phone…well, and an iPad…it’s a foot in both worlds for me). Just remember, it’s an unfair advantage you knowing a lot about me and what I look like, and I not knowing the same, so please do remedy that information disparity, at least a little, first thing. I would very much appreciate it.
Okay. Bat signal engaged!
Now it only remains to see what happens.

Like this:

Like Loading...
Be the first to like this.

Comments

  1. Mark Plus says
    We get it, Richard. You have had some success in seducing women. Fine. You have shown that you can live up to the standard in the propaganda about atheists’ wonderful sex lives.
    But for some reason no one in the atheist community of any stature wants to acknowledge the fact that atheism as a strategy for sexual fulfillment doesn’t work for a lot of men. Oh, sure, it probably works for the average-looking young christian woman who grows up subjected to her parents’ abstinence pledges, fear-based sex education and the like. She holds the gatekeeping position any way, so becoming an atheist can disinhibit her about enjoying her natural advantages.
    But this doesn’t work for the sexually yucky christian guy. The easy-to-reject young christian man discovers pretty quickly that he doesn’t increase his sexual market value by becoming an atheist. Instead he probably becomes another of those neckbearded incel atheists who shows up at atheist gatherings and wonders when he can cash in on the promise in atheist propaganda about sexual liberation.
    If anything, the secularization of sexual relationships has made rejections more psychologically damaging to men. In the Before-Times, when everyone shared approximately the same religious beliefs and took them more seriously than they do now, girls could reject the advances of the unbangable christian man by saying that god forbids fornication. This lie deflected attention and had the effect of sparing the young man’s feelings. Even after scores of such rejections, he could still maintain the illusion that a god loves him even if women don’t.
    Now, in our emerging “Jesus who?” age, women can give more or less the real reason for rejection: You don’t make me wet, so go away and leave me alone. The secular men who receives scores of these honest rejections must feel really bad about themselves after a while. No on wonder one of them suffers from an existential crisis every so often and goes postal.
    But again, atheist authority figures don’t want to talk about this for some reason. Instead they prefer to talk about how their atheism leads to all kinds of wonderful sexual opportunities for themselves.
    • Holy shit. MRA propaganda! Christian even! Such a rare bird these days. It’s almost quaint. I had to let this one through because it’s so hilarious. (And embarrassing to its author.)
  2. The Nerd says
    Now I’m curious as to whether this technique will work. I put an ad on Craigslist once, got a real girlfriend out of it, so strange things do happen. 😀
    • Yeah. Lots poly folk are on OkCupid, for example. Which isn’t all that different from this.
      Is doing the same thing only more efficiently (and publicly) really a negative? Time will tell. This is, as I noted, experimental. Maybe it’s just not a functional approach to putting yourself out there when wanting to meet people. I honestly don’t know.
      But someone has to find out, I guess. So here goes.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Facebook Google+ Google Yahoo WordPress.com
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>
Click the "Preview" button to preview your comment here.
© 2014 - FreethoughtBlogs.com
StatCounter - Free Web Tracker and Counter
%d bloggers like this:
WordPress
Enter your WordPress.com blog URL

http://.wordpress.com

Proceed
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%