207
208

Voting vs. Firearms (i.imgur.com)

chabanaisIpcha Mistabra が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着注目論争中古い順
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]piggiewiggy 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (7子コメント)

I find it disgusting that people can vote when they arent even a citizen of this country. They dont need to prove shit and yet they have the same rights as me bullshit.

[–]555nick 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (6子コメント)

It'll be a real surprise to you that those here illegally don't seek out contact with the government to do criminal acts and risk being kicked out of the country, all in order to make a near inconsequential addition to elections, but it doesn't happen.

[–]TheMossad 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

In my state, it's much easier for an illegal immigrant to buy an AR15 than it is for him to get a drivers license. It's sad that most conservatives are more worried about 1 or 2 illegals voting (which we KNOW is extremely rare) than thousands of them running guns to Mexico en masse for drugs (which we KNOW happens all the time).

Edit: Thanks for the downvotes. Seriously, what happened to conservatives that illegals running guns for drugs isn't a big deal but near non-existent voter fraud is? Is gun running for drugs only bad when that shitbag Eric Holder does it?

[–]555nick 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm sure it bothers gun advocates that guns flow into Mexico from the US, and they can barely type again and again "Strict Mexican gun control doesn't stop gun crime (when they get all the guns they can get to do that crime from the US) so therefore gun control is useless!"

[–]FasCap -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (3子コメント)

No, but ballot stuffing does. We wouldn't even know about it if they didn't mess it up so much ( I refuse to believe that the dead are returning in droves just to vote Democrat). Knowing someone's name should not be enough to cast their vote, and it should be harder to subvert the process than a corrupt election worker seeing a list of names they could just write in.

[–]555nick 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (2子コメント)

As I said, voter fraud in significant numbers doesn't happen.

It's like that email about the jet engine strapped to a Chevy Impala - a good story, but not true.

[–]FasCap -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (1子コメント)

There is a difference between Voter Fraud and Election Fraud. There is a difference between a felon intentionally voting dispite ineligibility, and a 110% registered voter turnout.

Those studies only look into the former. "Irregularities" happen in pretty much every close and contested election of significance, which is no surprise when you follow a system with less assurance than most undeveloped nations use. A few union guys can volunteer and throw off an entire district, it should not be this way.

[–]555nick 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

"Those studies only look into the former. [voter fraud]"

So you're talking about election fraud. How does this post advocating voter IDs (which the studies say isn't a significant issue) relate to election fraud absent voter fraud?

Anyway fuck our differences. I too am worried about election fraud (in my case when Diebold has significant security concerns).