jump to content
my subreddits
more »
want to join? sign in or create an account in seconds|
[-]
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
subreddit:subreddit
find submissions in "subreddit"
author:username
find submissions by "username"
site:example.com
find submissions from "example.com"
url:text
search for "text" in url
selftext:text
search for "text" in self post contents
self:yes (or self:no)
include (or exclude) self posts
nsfw:yes (or nsfw:no)
include (or exclude) results marked as NSFW
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
this post was submitted on
79 points (96% upvoted)
shortlink:
reset password

BestOfOutrageCulture

subscribeunsubscribe3,548 readers
~18 users here now
BestOfOutrageCulture - for when people use outrageous hyperbole when it's unwarranted. Typically involves non-serious matters being made serious fucking business.

Weekly Dramatic Reading Contest

Week Reading Winner
1 "The Death March of Feminism" /u/Quietuus
2 "The Cultural Divide" /u/Quietuus
3 'SWEAR TO ME' /u/Drosslemeyer
4 'Gamergate is over!' /u/Quietuus
5 'The Cliffs of Trooth' /u/Xuidj1105
6 'Excerpts from the GlooperGort crowdsourced book' /u/mehmsy
7 'What does "militarazing" gamergate mean?' /u/GodOfBrave

Content generators:
Similar subs:
"Discussion" subs:

So far, Anita Sarkeesian has been compared to:
1) Hitler
2) Glenn Beck
3) Al Sharpton
4) Jesse Jackson
5) Alex Jones
6) Anne Coulter
7) A Fox News reporter
8) A greedy robber baron
9) The "Iraq War hero" of the "social justice movement"
10) Charlie Manson
11) David Koresh
12) Jim Jones
13) Al Capone
14) Andrew Wakefield
15) Bernie Madoff
16) Kim Kardashian
17) Patricia Pulling
18) Westboro Baptist Church
19) A "fiery Baptist preacher in the Bible belt"
created by AttackTheMoona community for
No problem. We won't show you that ad again. Why didn't you like it?
Oops! I didn't mean to do this.
you are viewing a single comment's thread.
[–]Catabisis -34 points-33 points-32 points  (62 children)
I can tell you. We recognize feminism as existing for the sole purpose of allowing ugly women to be accepted into America's mainstream
[–]QuietuusThe Death March of Feminism 33 points34 points35 points  (38 children)
So, it feels like being a completely ridiculous self-parody?
Cool, good stuff to know.
[–]Catabisis comment score below threshold-31 points-30 points-29 points  (37 children)
Oh, no. All sane Americans understand the feminazi agenda
[–]fench 31 points32 points33 points  (18 children)
sane
the feminazi agenda
Never change, crazy internet idiot. Never change, oh lolcow mine.
[–]agentbueller 10 points11 points12 points  (2 children)
Troll account, accounts cap out at -100 karma now.
[–]QuietuusThe Death March of Feminism 3 points4 points5 points  (1 child)
When did that come in?
[–]Don_Quijoder 2 points3 points4 points  (0 children)
A couple months ago. Well after they got rid of being able to see the upvote/downvote count. I'm guessing they figured it would lessen the amount of people going for the lowest score.
I don't think it's helped much at all.
[–]Catabisis -3 points-2 points-1 points  (14 children)
Crazy? Idiot? Never change? Here, allow me to remind you of the bull-dyke feminist doctrine being pushed by the the women you look up to. http://www.experienceproject.com/stories/Havent-Lost-My-Virginity/1269918
[–]flyrfradegshill intern for the JIDF 3 points4 points5 points  (2 children)
[–]isreactionary_bot 4 points5 points6 points  (1 child)
/u/Catabisis post history contains participation in the following subreddits:
/r/MensRights: 14 comments (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8), combined score: -3.
/r/conspiracy: 11 comments (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8), combined score: 129.
/r/TheRedPill: 5 comments (1, 2, 3, 4, 5), combined score: -1.
/r/new_right: 3 comments (1, 2, 3), combined score: 6.
/r/fatpeoplehate: 2 comments (1, 2), combined score: -1.
/r/sjwhate: 1 comment (1), combined score: 4.
/r/DarkEnlightenment: 1 comment (1), combined score: 1.
/r/SRSsucks: 1 comment (1), combined score: -1.
/r/WhiteRights: 1 comment (1), combined score: 3.

I'm a bot. Only the past 1,000 comments are fetched.
[–]Catabisis -1 points0 points1 point  (0 children)
Wait a minute. That's not fair. Those aren't even my best quotes. Here, try these. Bull-dyke feminism. You gotta love those girls. lol. http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/radical-feminism or these http://www.womenagainstmen.com/media/feminism-is-a-hate-group.html And these too. I saved the very best for last; http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread557984/pg1
[–]QuietuusThe Death March of Feminism 1 point2 points3 points  (10 children)
Standard mix of statements that only sound objectionable to people who don't know what they're talking about (You've got no reason to support the nuclear family, mate, no matter how Dark Enlightenment you are; no one in the 19th century lived in a nuclear family, and it was mostly a myth in the 20th, tbh), out of context shit, and weird marginal material radfem material from 20+ years ago (The SCUM manifesto, mid 90's anti-SRA pamphlets) that most contemporary feminists have probably never read or even heard of. I love how this shit ignores the massive schisms inside feminism over stuff like this, all in order to help create this paranoid monolith.
[–]Catabisis -2 points-1 points0 points  (9 children)
I have a degree in history you are categorically full of shit if you think the nuclear family did not exist in the 19th and 20th centuries. The quotes I sent are from influential leaders of the feminist movement. They are the ones pushing the radical doctrine of Third Wave Feminism. If you think otherwise then you have no clue what drives that movement. I bet you didn't know that, ironically, the word feminism was coined by a man. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminism Here are some quotes from the contemporary founder of the movement from 50 years ago. http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread557984/pg1
[–]QuietuusThe Death March of Feminism 1 point2 points3 points  (3 children)
I have a degree in history

Posts links to abovetopsecret.com
Oh lordy loo.
Also, please tell me how any notable number of people in the 19th century in the West lived in nuclear families as we would conceive them. Two parents and their children living together in a single household. Please tell me, I can't wait.
[–]Catabisis -2 points-1 points0 points  (2 children)
It was the norm if you speak of one as a husband wife, and children.
[–]QuietuusThe Death March of Feminism 1 point2 points3 points  (1 child)
Living together, in one household, with no extended family, no cohabiting families, not in service, not having servants, that is to say performing any of the discrete economic and social functions which we ascribe to the nuclear family in the post-war period and are meant whenever anyone who actually gives a shit uses the term?
[–]LittleHelperRobot 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
That's why I'm here, I don't judge you. PM /u/xl0 if I'm causing any trouble. WUT?
[–]autowikibot 0 points1 point2 points  (3 children)


Feminism is a collection of movements and ideologies that share a common goal: to define, establish, and achieve equal political, economic, cultural, personal, and social rights for women. This includes seeking to establish equal opportunities for women in education and employment. A feminist advocates or supports the rights and equality of women.
Feminist movements have campaigned and continue to campaign for women's rights, including the right to vote, to hold public office, to work, to fair wages or equal pay, to own property, to education, to enter contracts, to have equal rights within marriage, and to have maternity leave. Feminists have also worked to promote bodily autonomy and integrity, and to protect women and girls from rape, sexual harassment, and domestic violence.
Feminist campaigns are generally considered to be the main force behind major historical societal changes, particularly in the West, where they are near-universally credited with having achieved women's suffrage, gender neutrality in English, equal pay for women, reproductive rights for women (including access to contraceptives and abortion), and the right to enter into contracts and own property. Although feminist advocacy is and has been mainly focused on women's rights, some feminists, including bell hooks, argue for the inclusion of men's liberation within its aims because men are also harmed by traditional gender roles.
Feminist theory, which emerged from feminist movements, aims to understand the nature of gender inequality by examining women's social roles and lived experience; it has developed theories in a variety of disciplines in order to respond to issues such as the social construction of sex and gender. Some forms of feminism have been criticized for taking into account only white, middle-class, educated perspectives. This led to the creation of ethnically specific or multiculturalist forms of feminism.

Image i - International Women's Day rally in Dhaka, Bangladesh on 8 March 2005, organized by the National Women Workers Trade Union Centre

Parent commenter can toggle NSFW or delete. Will also delete on comment score of -1 or less. | FAQs | Mods | Magic Words
[–]Catabisis -1 points0 points1 point  (2 children)
That is a nice way of putting it. It is like the Klan explaining their cause while wearing suits and ties. The fact remains that radical feminism fuels the movement and their objective is to ultimately destroy the family with their bull-dyke lesbian philosophy
[–]speed0spank 1 point2 points3 points  (1 child)
God damn I needed that laugh after a shitty day. I would say don't ever change but I know you won't.
[–]Catabisis -2 points-1 points0 points  (2 children)
No. You missed your mark terribly. Here, allow me to show you how to hit a bullseye. Here's some quotes from your bull-dyke feminist nazi leaders http://www.experienceproject.com/stories/Havent-Lost-My-Virginity/1269918
[–]flyrfradegshill intern for the JIDF 1 point2 points3 points  (0 children)
Lmfao how many times are you going to post that exact same link? Saying "bull-dyke feminist nazi leaders" doesn't exactly make you look well-reasoned or rational either.
[–]fb95dd7063 1 point2 points3 points  (0 children)
'leaders'
lmao k
[–]NefariousBanana 3 points4 points5 points  (13 children)
I think if you use the word "feminazis" you should also use the word "manjews" just to make it even clearer how monkeyshit crazy you are.
[–]flyrfradegshill intern for the JIDF 1 point2 points3 points  (0 children)
I love when people use the term "feminazi" because of how ironic it is. Pretty sure the National Socialists advocated women staying in the home to raise Aryan babies...
[–]Catabisis -5 points-4 points-3 points  (11 children)
Really? Here, read some of the mentally stable quotes coming from your humble feminist nazi leaders that you look up to. http://www.experienceproject.com/stories/Havent-Lost-My-Virginity/1269918
[–]flyrfradegshill intern for the JIDF 2 points3 points4 points  (5 children)
Ironic that you complain about Nazis when you post in /r/WhiteRights...
[–]Catabisis -1 points0 points1 point  (4 children)
Yeah? What's your point? That does not diminish that feminism is run by anti-family, bull dyke lesbian and transgender feminist nazis masquerading as pillars of democracy. Correct? Now give me gold., because in the deepest crevasse of your heart you know what I am telling you is the truth. You just can't stand a man to be the messenger. But that's ok. Truth always stands on its own. And when it does in your situation here, it will slap you in the face so hard your lips will beat you to the hospital.
[–]flyrfradegshill intern for the JIDF 0 points1 point2 points  (3 children)
Nazis were racists just like you! They were also not feminists! They wanted women to stay at home and raise Aryan sons. Your history degree is 100% bullshit because you clearly have no understanding of history. But, please, keep repeating the term "bull dyke lesbian" over and over, because it makes you seem extremely educated and unbiased. I'm perfectly okay with learning from a man if what he's saying isn't a steaming pile of horse shit, which unfortunately, is true about everything you have said. Now kindly fuck off.
[–]Catabisis -1 points0 points1 point  (2 children)
There is nothing racist about me. Everything I have stated-ever-can be defended in a rational, logical way as long as it is devoid of the censoring manipulation of political correctness. Nazis were self-absorbed narcissists. Just as the leaders of feminists are. When I use Nazism to describe feminism I am using a poetic inference. So, yes, feminist are indeed Nazis due to their narrow mindedness toward their goal of accusing others of oppressing them while denying others what they strive to attain. Which is the domination of all others at the expense the men they claim are keeping them down. Feminists want to rule the world. So, why should men give them anything when viewed from that context?
[–]flyrfradegshill intern for the JIDF 0 points1 point2 points  (1 child)
There's nothing "poetic", or even slightly accurate, about comparing people who want gender equality to people who committed mass genocide. All you're doing is creating a massive strawman by cherrypicking quotes from the most radical and the least relevant feminist authors who wrote in the early 90s and earlier.
[–]NefariousBanana 2 points3 points4 points  (4 children)
Not sure if someone already did this, but...
[–]isreactionary_bot 2 points3 points4 points  (2 children)
/u/Catabisis post history contains participation in the following subreddits:
/r/MensRights: 14 comments (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8), combined score: 4.
/r/conspiracy: 10 comments (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8), combined score: 131.
/r/TheRedPill: 5 comments (1, 2, 3, 4, 5), combined score: -1.
/r/new_right: 3 comments (1, 2, 3), combined score: 6.
/r/fatpeoplehate: 2 comments (1, 2), combined score: 3.
/r/sjwhate: 1 comment (1), combined score: 3.
/r/DarkEnlightenment: 1 comment (1), combined score: 1.
/r/SRSsucks: 1 comment (1), combined score: -1.
/r/WhiteRights: 1 comment (1), combined score: 6.

I'm a bot. Only the past 1,000 comments are fetched.
[–]flyrfradegshill intern for the JIDF 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
Bless his dumb bigoted heart.
[–]Catabisis -1 points0 points1 point  (0 children)
Well, there you go with your support for censorship. Nice. Spoken like a true Marxist feminist.
[–]flyrfradegshill intern for the JIDF 1 point2 points3 points  (0 children)
I did a little while back. Let's just say the results were not very shocking at all.
[–]cromwest 5 points6 points7 points  (7 children)
Because women can only be evaluated on how they harden your dick.
[–]Catabisis -2 points-1 points0 points  (6 children)
I can jack off, thank you. My evaluation comes from watching the mentally ill leading your feminist cause for the past 40 years. Maybe you need to begin detaching your emotions from your feminism and looking at your cause intellectually. If you already know the position of these people you are as disgusting as they are. Here, allow me to educat you about feminism. http://www.experienceproject.com/stories/Havent-Lost-My-Virginity/1269918
[–]flyrfradegshill intern for the JIDF 2 points3 points4 points  (3 children)
I'm keeping a tally of how many times you post that link in this thread. It's at 5 now.
[–]Catabisis -1 points0 points1 point  (2 children)
I just posted it again. Read the message. It is what drives the movement you defend. Read the doctrine of Third Wave Feminism. That is the anti-family bullshit you support that is being driven by lesbian and transgender thinking
[–]flyrfradegshill intern for the JIDF 1 point2 points3 points  (1 child)
What's wrong with lesbian and transgender people? Also, considering your current age (you indicate that you're retired), I highly doubt you studied any form of third wave feminism (which is the current wave) unless you just got a degree.
[–]Catabisis 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
I just got my degree 6 years ago at age 50
[–]cromwest 1 point2 points3 points  (1 child)
I don't need a half illiterate man going his own way to "educat" me with a wall of quotes mainly from 4 or 5 of the most ridiculous people possible for the subject. Most of those quotes aren't even extreme within the larger point they were trying to convey or the context of the time in which they were said. Must be frustrating to come up with reasons that women find you repulsive that don't involve any self examination on your part.
[–]Catabisis -1 points0 points1 point  (0 children)
You are being a apologist for the radical movement you call feminism. Educate yourself on the Third Wave feminist thinking. That is the reality of the statements you claim I take out of context.
[–]Don_Quijoder 2 points3 points4 points  (2 children)
I don't think you understand feminism at all.
[–]Don_Quijoder 2 points3 points4 points  (0 children)
Will you stop linking this link? It's honestly just spamming at this point.
I don't need whatever in the hell experienceproject.com is to tell me what feminism is about.
[–]flyrfradegshill intern for the JIDF 3 points4 points5 points  (11 children)
I already had you tagged as "horrible misogynist". What luck!
[–]Catabisis -2 points-1 points0 points  (10 children)
Why would you ever label me a misogynist? All I have done is base my feminist judgements on the nazis you call your feminist leaders. Here, allow he to introduce you to a few. Either you know, and are disgusting enough to follow these people, or you are naive and need a serious education about what the feminist movement has always been about. http://www.experienceproject.com/stories/Havent-Lost-My-Virginity/1269918
[–]flyrfradegshill intern for the JIDF 0 points1 point2 points  (9 children)
[–]Catabisis -1 points0 points1 point  (8 children)
Ok. With these, we are even. So why are you complaining about men when women are thinking the same? Why, only because you feel you are the loser in the game of Life? Also, these aren't leaders of a men's movement. The women here are the leaders of the feminist movement you so subscribe. Here: http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/radical-feminism
[–]flyrfradegshill intern for the JIDF 1 point2 points3 points  (7 children)
When exactly was I complaining about men? Also, notice those quote are from radical feminists. I am not a radical feminist.
[–]Catabisis -1 points0 points1 point  (6 children)
You miss the whole point. It doesn't matter if you are a radical feminist. Those radicals are driving the movement. Their quotes are the foundation of what the movement represents.
[–]flyrfradegshill intern for the JIDF 0 points1 point2 points  (5 children)
Lol the fact that you think radicals are driving the movement basically invalidates everything you say. Back to the gulag with you.
[–]Catabisis -1 points0 points1 point  (4 children)
I have a history major. Part of my requirement to acquire my degree was to take a women's studies course. Here is the kind of rhetoric driving a Third Wave feminism. http://www.experienceproject.com/stories/Havent-Lost-My-Virginity/1269918
[–]flyrfradegshill intern for the JIDF 0 points1 point2 points  (3 children)
Honey, no, that's not third wave feminism. Your history degree means nothing if all you can do is post the same link over and over again.
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. © 2015 reddit inc. All rights reserved.
REDDIT and the ALIEN Logo are registered trademarks of reddit inc.
π Rendered by PID 27159 on app-289 at 2015-04-21 03:50:53.026012+00:00 running db6ec3b country code: DE.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%