use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
詳しくは検索FAQを参照
高度な検索: 投稿者や、subredditで……
323 現在のここのユーザー
Rules: Don't post/discuss mirrors or torrents of any version of KSP No memes, image macros or posts unrelated to KSP. Post memes/macros to /r/KSPMemes. See the discussion on misc posts for more info All posts now require flair. Refrain from submitting images that involve real life space disasters that resulted in loss of life This game has a steep learning curve! Be kind and helpful to users of all skill levels.
Don't post/discuss mirrors or torrents of any version of KSP
No memes, image macros or posts unrelated to KSP. Post memes/macros to /r/KSPMemes. See the discussion on misc posts for more info
All posts now require flair.
Refrain from submitting images that involve real life space disasters that resulted in loss of life
This game has a steep learning curve! Be kind and helpful to users of all skill levels.
Important Links Kerbal Space Program Support/bug reports Forums Frequently Asked Questions The Mod List Official DarkMultiplayer Server Kerbal Subreddits Kerbal Academy What is reddit? Other useful links KerbalX - Share your craft files! Official IRC #KSPOfficial @ irc.esper.net Community Teamspeak Server ksp.nabaal.net Kerbal Podcast
Kerbal Space Program
Support/bug reports
Forums
Frequently Asked Questions
The Mod List
Official DarkMultiplayer Server
Kerbal Subreddits
Kerbal Academy
What is reddit?
KerbalX - Share your craft files!
Official IRC #KSPOfficial @ irc.esper.net
Community Teamspeak Server ksp.nabaal.net
Kerbal Podcast
Weekly Challenge: Unstoppable! Rules and additional information Mod List Complete Weekly Challenge Guide Flair Guide
Rules and additional information
Mod List
Complete Weekly Challenge Guide
Flair Guide
Art Contest Held at random, unpredictable intervals! Last contest's winning artist: Charle_Rogerl! Past Winning Submissions
Held at random, unpredictable intervals!
Last contest's winning artist: Charle_Rogerl!
Past Winning Submissions
Tutorials The community's favorite tutorials! What is Kerbal Space Program? Installing 64 bit KSP on Linux (dual boot) The Missing Manual - Volume I WernherVonKerman's Kerbal Rocket School Scott Manley's Kerbal Space Program 101 The KSP Wiki's official tutorials (text) Sub's Plane/SSTO Design for Beginners Tips and tricks for v.23 Print your own guidebook!
The community's favorite tutorials!
What is Kerbal Space Program?
Installing 64 bit KSP on Linux (dual boot)
The Missing Manual - Volume I
WernherVonKerman's Kerbal Rocket School
Scott Manley's Kerbal Space Program 101
The KSP Wiki's official tutorials (text)
Sub's Plane/SSTO Design for Beginners
Tips and tricks for v.23
Print your own guidebook!
Work in the space industry? Send us a message with proof, and job title and we'll give you some flair to show it!
Send us a message with proof, and job title and we'll give you some flair to show it!
Have you developed a mod? Send us a message with proof, and we'll give you some flair to show it!
Send us a message with proof, and we'll give you some flair to show it!
This subreddit is night mode compatible
New Service Bays shown on SquadCast (i.imgur.com)
RoverDude_KSPUSI Dev / Cat Herder が 5 時間 前 投稿
残りのコメントをみる →
[–]MaturinTheTurtle -59 ポイント-58 ポイント-57 ポイント 5 時間 前 (74子コメント)
Yeah. Pretty innovative.
[–]CrazyViking 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント 4 時間 前 (0子コメント)
I use that mod and they really don't look similar.
[–]Captain_Planetesimal 28 ポイント29 ポイント30 ポイント 5 時間 前 (68子コメント)
Man I agree with you on a lot of things but at some point you have got to just lay the fuck off
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-50 ポイント-49 ポイント-48 ポイント 5 時間 前 (67子コメント)
Why? Explain to me why Squad should be able to plagiarize somebody else's work without criticism.
[–]Captain_Planetesimal 21 ポイント22 ポイント23 ポイント 5 時間 前 (3子コメント)
calling this plagiarism is like saying Elon Musk stole the idea of landing from the Wright brothers
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-39 ポイント-38 ポイント-37 ポイント 4 時間 前 (2子コメント)
Squad didn't steal the idea. They stole the parts. We're not talking about a superficial similarity here.
[–]Bright-Spark 16 ポイント17 ポイント18 ポイント 3 時間 前 (0子コメント)
They are both based on the same Real-Life counterpart, so of course they are extremely similiar!
[–]CoveredInBees1 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント 3 時間 前 (0子コメント)
Yes. We are.
[–]MoeKin 18 ポイント19 ポイント20 ポイント 5 時間 前 (20子コメント)
you mean the mod someone made of their game in progress? lol. So squad can't do service bays because a modder did it first? what about better aerodynamics or mining for resources? Also things that modders did first.
edit: and the modder made that part specifcally to fit into the KSP aesthetic. They made it to look like 'stock'
[–]grtwatkins 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 3 時間 前 (1子コメント)
Don't forget rovers! Those were around in mod form long before they were official
[–]MoeKin 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 2 時間 前 (0子コメント)
and wheels. some modder invented wheels in space! clutch my pearls!
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-37 ポイント-36 ポイント-35 ポイント 4 時間 前 (17子コメント)
you mean the mod someone made of their game in progress?
Uh no, I mean the popular mod that's been around for two and a half years.
So squad can't do service bays because a modder did it first?
No, Squad shouldn't directly copy another person's work down to the details. If they want to do compartments or cargo bays they should create original parts instead of copying parts that already exist down to the details of how the doors open.
[–]MoeKin 13 ポイント14 ポイント15 ポイント 4 時間 前 (16子コメント)
those aren't copies. If you're going to bicker about something so petty at least do it honestly. The mods were 'copies' of Squads stock aesthetics in the first place. You think the modder now gets to own part of Squad's concepts because they made that part first? That's not a rational argument. It borders on a troll quite frankly. Be serious.
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-34 ポイント-33 ポイント-32 ポイント 4 時間 前 (15子コメント)
We're not talking about an "aesthetic." We're talking about a 3D model. The one Squad showed today is substantively identical to one made by another artist more than two years ago. That's not cool. Squad shouldn't copy other people's work. I find it hard to understand why you think they should.
[–]Crox22 17 ポイント18 ポイント19 ポイント 4 時間 前 (8子コメント)
I just compared the pics from the mod with the pic from Squadcast. It's not a copy. For one thing, the Squad one has a central pillar in the middle if it. The doors are different, and when open the opening is bigger. The Squad one has modeled handles on the doors. The sides of the parts are different from the doors, where in the mod they look pretty much the same all the way around.
In fact, the function is about the only similarity between the mod and the new Squad parts.
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-26 ポイント-25 ポイント-24 ポイント 4 時間 前 (7子コメント)
For one thing, the Squad one has a central pillar in the middle if it.
That's not a substantive difference. That's a detail.
The doors are different
No they're not. They're the same size, in the same arrangement and in the same places.
[–]Crox22 13 ポイント14 ポイント15 ポイント 4 時間 前 (3子コメント)
That's new geometry, which in itself is enough to prove that it's not identical as you claim.
They look like different sizes to me.
I think at this point you just really want to be right, even in the face of tons of evidence to the contrary.
[–]IRLpuddles 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 4 時間 前 (2子コメント)
Handles?
Vertical gold/gray band?
Interior textures?
Interior wall texture?
Height?
what else are you looking for?
[–]MoeKin 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 4 時間 前 (5子コメント)
I do not agree that squad 'copied' the modders work. If anything it is the other way around. The modder made that part specifically to fit into KSP and specifically to look like a stock part and fit with other stock parts. I think your critique is weak because you totally ignore this obvious fact and your attacks on squad so over the top that are laughable.
Give it up. Troll elsewhere.
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-28 ポイント-27 ポイント-26 ポイント 4 時間 前 (4子コメント)
I do not agree that squad 'copied' the modders work.
Not Squad. One particular artist who is not a Squad employee. He's posting elsewhere in this thread, so you can look and see who it is if you want. I don't want to name names in the third person. No point to that.
If anything it is the other way around.
Given that the original parts were made in 2013 and these new ones were just made recently, that makes no sense of any kind. I think you can probably see that for yourself.
I think your critique is weak because you totally ignore this obvious fact
We're not talking about what the parts look like. We're talking about the 3D geometry of the parts. I'm not saying they resemble each other. I'm saying this particular artist stole the geometric design of the parts from the other artist. If you look at the parts you will see this for yourself.
I see you're not interesting in honesty. That's cool. Later.
[–]MoeKin 14 ポイント15 ポイント16 ポイント 4 時間 前 (3子コメント)
I don't want to name names in the third person. No point to that.
Seriously? You're posting wild, nasty and unsupported accusations in an open forum and now you want to pretend modesty? Get off.
Given that the original parts were made in 2013 and these new ones were just made recently, that makes no sense of any kind
I see you completely and totally ignore the fact that the modded parts were made to fit into and look like stock parts for an in development game. That you repeatedly ignore this essential fact brought repeatedly by various posters in this thread is kind of a tell that you're not interested in an open exchange of ideas.
I'm saying this particular artist stole the geometric design
You mean a cylinder? You mean hinges and swinging doors? You think the modder invented cylinders? I think your judgement on this matter is really skewed and your nasty hyperbole tremendously out of place.
I see you're not interesting in honesty.
See my above comments on your dishonest arguments.
[–]RoverDude_KSPUSI Dev / Cat Herder[S] 31 ポイント32 ポイント33 ポイント 4 時間 前 (16子コメント)
Plagiarize? Really? Dude. It's a low profile cargo bay. This is not exactly a unique idea.
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-46 ポイント-45 ポイント-44 ポイント 4 時間 前 (15子コメント)
Yes, really. "Dude." Your model is too similar to Nothke's to pass the sniff test. It's the same down to the way the doors open. Do you contend that you'd never seen Nothke's work and that your model is just coincidentally identical to his?
[–]RoverDude_KSPUSI Dev / Cat Herder[S] 28 ポイント29 ポイント30 ポイント 4 時間 前 (4子コメント)
I've seen his mod, and there are only so many ways to draw a cargo bay, or to open a door (the side hinges are used because vertical lift ones take up too much space, and top hinges are too skinny and interfere with other parts).
You know... kinda like the way every other cargo bay opens. The only reason I did not bifold the doors is because that thing has a ton of colliders already.
The idea that making a low profile cargo bay is in any way plagiarism is just fucking ridiculous.
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-44 ポイント-43 ポイント-42 ポイント 4 時間 前 (3子コメント)
kinda like the way every other cargo bay opens.
Except not really, right? Because Tal's cargo bay doors slide open rather than being hinged as shown here. That's something you could've done.
Or Paul's service bays (top right), which are double-hinged and articulated so they don't clip the kerbal who opens them on EVA.
But instead, you somehow managed to come up, completely independently, with a part that is exactly the same in shape, proportion and function with one another artist created two and a half years ago?
You didn't make "a low profile cargo bay." You made Nothke's cargo bay. It's identical. Not reminiscent, not similar. Identical.
Bob, this is not okay. I don't know what your whole deal is. Maybe you were on a deadline and pressed for time or something. I don't know and I don't care. But it's not okay to take somebody else's work and claim it for your own without so much as a "thanks for the inspiration."
Have a little self respect.
[–]CGLADOS 18 ポイント19 ポイント20 ポイント 3 時間 前 (0子コメント)
Wait wait wait. In saying they plagiarized their doors, you gave exampkes of other ones saying they should have plagiarized those instead?
[–]undercoveryankee 14 ポイント15 ポイント16 ポイント 3 時間 前 (0子コメント)
And if he had chosen sliding doors, you would be accusing him of plagiarizing Talisar. There's no objective standard beyond "If it has Squad's name on it, there must be something wrong with it."
[–]CoveredInBees1 13 ポイント14 ポイント15 ポイント 3 時間 前 (0子コメント)
You keep using the word "identical". I do not think that word means what you think it means.
[–]Taidashar 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント 3 時間 前 (0子コメント)
It's a cylinder with doors, there's not really many other options for making an inline storage compartment, and it's not like it was an original idea with the mod, people had been asking for this part long before the mod.
[–]Euryleia 13 ポイント14 ポイント15 ポイント 4 時間 前 (0子コメント)
It's the same down to the way the doors open.
You may need to see an optometrist...
[–]Captain_Planetesimal 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント 4 時間 前 (7子コメント)
It has a ribbed texture. It's not identical.
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-35 ポイント-34 ポイント-33 ポイント 4 時間 前 (6子コメント)
We aren't talking about textures, but if we were that would be a peculiar thing to bring up, since both have extremely similar textures. Did you not look at the pictures?
[–]Captain_Planetesimal 17 ポイント18 ポイント19 ポイント 4 時間 前 (5子コメント)
I did, they're different, and at this point you're just grandstanding about some of the most trifling shit
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-35 ポイント-34 ポイント-33 ポイント 4 時間 前 (4子コメント)
You can get as personal as you want, man. I really don't care. If you don't see that the parts have identical 3D geometry, then I can't help you. If you don't agree with me when I say that modelers shouldn't steal other modelers' work, then I don't understand you. If you just want to post more comments insulting me you're free to do that, but honestly, do you think it's a great use of your time?
[–]Captain_Planetesimal 14 ポイント15 ポイント16 ポイント 4 時間 前 (1子コメント)
Insulting you and criticizing your argument are not the same thing
[–]IRLpuddles 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント 4 時間 前 (1子コメント)
parts have identical 3D geometry
Uh, they're designed to fit on a rocket stack.
I don't even know whether or not to take you seriously.
You clown.
[–]western78 17 ポイント18 ポイント19 ポイント 5 時間 前 (24子コメント)
It's not like the guy who made the mod invented the idea of service bays. For all we know it was something they have intended to do for a long time.
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-39 ポイント-38 ポイント-37 ポイント 4 時間 前 (23子コメント)
Squad didn't copy the idea. They copied the parts. And 6S Service Compartment Tubes wasn't a recent or obscure mod. It's been around since December of 2013 and it was very popular. It's not credible to argue that Squad had this in their pocket for two and a half years, nor is it credible to assert that the guy who modeled them somehow never knew about the original parts, given that he's an active member of the modding fraternity himself.
This is not something that should go unremarked upon. This is cheap and sleazy.
[–]RoverDude_KSPUSI Dev / Cat Herder[S] 33 ポイント34 ポイント35 ポイント 4 時間 前 (8子コメント)
You know, I take some pretty serious and personal offense to that. It's a unique model, unique animations, and a unique texture for a pretty darn common solution to a fairly basic problem. We needed a storage compartment, I made it low profile because cargo bays are too tall, and tippy rockets suck. Done.
Seriously. What an ass.
[–]dwilliam16 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント 3 時間 前 (1子コメント)
It's a unique model, unique animations
My two cents. Not a modder by any means; love all aspects of the community. I originally thought the same thing as MaturinTheTurtle.
Then I looked again and realized, that is a new part and an awesome one at that. I did a quick comparison to show.
Let the flames begin. :-/
[–]Antal_Marius 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント たった今 (0子コメント)
That center truss is going away apparently, but your point still stands.
[–]Raysparks38 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 3 時間 前 (0子コメント)
Don't listen to him, you make some seriously awesome work.
[–]SweetPotardo 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 2 時間 前 (0子コメント)
Look at his comment history; don't feed the aspies.
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-36 ポイント-35 ポイント-34 ポイント 4 時間 前 (2子コメント)
It's a unique model
No it isn't. That's the whole point. Your models are substantively identical to models created years ago by another artist. I'll ask again: Is it your contention that you'd never seen them and that this is all just a big coincidence?
a pretty darn common solution
Then show me the third example of this, please. If it's so common, there should be more of them out there than just Nothke's and yours, right?
You can puff up your "I take offense sirrah" all your want. It doesn't change the fact that you appear to have plagiarized another artist's work. At the very least, an apology and an acknowledgement of the original artist are in order.
[–]RoverDude_KSPUSI Dev / Cat Herder[S] 19 ポイント20 ポイント21 ポイント 4 時間 前 (1子コメント)
There is no original artist to apologize to, nor one to acknowledge. It would be like insisting I apologize to (insert random modder here) because we added a 1.25m xenon tank.
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-28 ポイント-27 ポイント-26 ポイント 4 時間 前 (0子コメント)
There is no original artist to apologize to
Yes there is.
Where's your third example of an identical part to the one you modeled?
[–]western78 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント 4 時間 前 (12子コメント)
You're whole argument is ridiculous. Of course it's credible to think Squad has had plans for things they have not had a chance to do until now. Do you think they are stealing Deadly Reentry as well?
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-29 ポイント-28 ポイント-27 ポイント 4 時間 前 (11子コメント)
Of course it's credible to think Squad has had plans for things they have not had a chance to do until now.
Max said in the stream that they only came up with the plan for these parts after they did recent work on aerodynamics. So no.
Do you think they are stealing Deadly Reentry as well?
You don't seem to be understanding this very simple fact: Bob appears to have looked at another artist's work and made a copy of it. He didn't take inspiration from it, he didn't go "Oh, that's an interesting idea" and then do his own thing with it. He copied it and took credit for the copy himself. He didn't steal an idea; he stole the actual work itself.
How come you aren't getting that?
[–]RoverDude_KSPUSI Dev / Cat Herder[S] 23 ポイント24 ポイント25 ポイント 4 時間 前 (10子コメント)
Bullshit, and I will continue reporting you for libel, because that is what you are engaging in.
It is not a copy. Even attachment and function is different. Nothke's has open tops and bottoms, with your sides as attachment area (hence the small doors). Ours has very large doors on both sides, no side attachment, and includes a floor/ceiling as your primary attachment surface.
It's the same shape... because it fits on the same rocket stack. Doors open out because that's the only solid contiguous area you have to slap a hinge.
I do not know what the fuck is with your personal crusade, but you're tossing around some pretty serious accusations based on your own irrational hatred for a game company, and your own delusions.
[–]ItFrightensMe 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント 4 時間 前 (0子コメント)
Just a troll
[–]szepaine 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 3 時間 前 (0子コメント)
I suggest ignoring him. Nobody feed the trolls please
[–]MoeKin 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 4 時間 前 (0子コメント)
At wikipedia this is usually the moment someone suggests a cup of tea. ;-) Then we can get back to regularly scheduled hype train.
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-21 ポイント-20 ポイント-19 ポイント 4 時間 前 (6子コメント)
I will continue reporting you for libel
Libel is published. This would be slander. But only if it were false.
It is not a copy.
Can you prove that somehow? I mean, it's obvious from looking at the two parts side-by-side that they have the same geometry and function, so that doesn't help your case. What else can you say about your work to distinguish it from the originals?
Nothke's has open tops and bottoms
That's true. But the sides of your parts are substantively identical to his.
Ours has very large doors on both sides
So does his.
Doors open out because that's the only solid contiguous area you have to slap a hinge.
In another comment I showed you two very well known examples of differently designed doors. You didn't have to make your doors identical to Nothke's. Choosing to do so crossed the line and was not okay.
I do not know what the fuck is with your personal crusade
I have no personal crusade. Stop trying to act like you're some kind of victim. You are being accused, right now, by me, of plagiarism. I've shown you the work I'm accusing you of copying. I've explained to you why I'm accusing you of copying it. You've defended yourself by asserting that your creative choices were somehow inevitable, that your hands were creatively tied, that there was no other way to make the parts you made but the way you made them, at which point I showed you two other, radically different ways that others have come up with. At this point, the ball is back in your court to either say "You're right, my design is too close to the original, I should acknowledge that" or "This is just an unfortunate coincidence and here's why." Getting angry and defensive doesn't help you.
I can certainly say that if I were running Squad I would have smashed your keyboard to splinters an hour ago so we could prepare some kind of damage-control statement that at the very least doesn't make things worse.
[–]allert0n 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント 4 時間 前 (1子コメント)
"Libel is published. This would be slander. But only if it were false."
Libel need not be formally published, but the distinction between the libel and slander is rather petty in the first place. Defamation is, of course, the more serious torte, as intention takes precedence over belief of truth.
Also the defense of truth only mitigates damages, it does not erase them (Johnson v. Johnson 1995). So your accusations, even if you believe them to be true, even if you can prove they are factually true (highly unlikely) may still fall under the category of defamation, libel, or slander, unless of course you demonstrate malicious intent on behalf of the accused.
Don't shit talk about the law, kid.
Source: Legal and contracts assistant for an oilsands company.
[–]BLueLightning0 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント 4 時間 前 (2子コメント)
that there was no other way to make the parts you made but the way you made them, at which point I showed you two other, radically different ways that others have come up with
There are only so many ways of putting a door on a cylinder. If he had used one of the other two, would it be any different? It would have still been done by a modder first. And I think this design is the best of the three, and squad couldn't have improved on it if they tried. And squads doors are larger, and the sides have additional detailing, which the mod is missing. But really, squad couldn't have done anything else.
[–]Jumpy89 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 36 分 前 (0子コメント)
Shit, if people like you could join NASA and invest as much time and energy designing real rocket parts are you are arguing about fake video game ones on the Internet we could have put a man on Mars by now.
[–]sleepwalker77 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント 3 時間 前 (0子コメント)
I love when you start grandstanding. It's one of those moments that really brings the rest of the community together.
[–]Shmeves 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 1 時間 前 (0子コメント)
Do you work for Apple?
[–]TotesMessenger 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 19 分 前 (0子コメント)
This thread has been linked to from another place on reddit.
If you follow any of the above links, respect the rules of reddit and don't vote. (Info / Contact)
π Rendered by PID 31014 on app-285 at 2015-04-18 06:14:29.578668+00:00 running 301cfbe country code: JP.
残りのコメントをみる →
[–]MaturinTheTurtle -59 ポイント-58 ポイント-57 ポイント (74子コメント)
[–]CrazyViking 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Captain_Planetesimal 28 ポイント29 ポイント30 ポイント (68子コメント)
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-50 ポイント-49 ポイント-48 ポイント (67子コメント)
[–]Captain_Planetesimal 21 ポイント22 ポイント23 ポイント (3子コメント)
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-39 ポイント-38 ポイント-37 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Bright-Spark 16 ポイント17 ポイント18 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]CoveredInBees1 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]MoeKin 18 ポイント19 ポイント20 ポイント (20子コメント)
[–]grtwatkins 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]MoeKin 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-37 ポイント-36 ポイント-35 ポイント (17子コメント)
[–]MoeKin 13 ポイント14 ポイント15 ポイント (16子コメント)
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-34 ポイント-33 ポイント-32 ポイント (15子コメント)
[–]Crox22 17 ポイント18 ポイント19 ポイント (8子コメント)
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-26 ポイント-25 ポイント-24 ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]Crox22 13 ポイント14 ポイント15 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]IRLpuddles 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]MoeKin 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (5子コメント)
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-28 ポイント-27 ポイント-26 ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]MoeKin 14 ポイント15 ポイント16 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]RoverDude_KSPUSI Dev / Cat Herder[S] 31 ポイント32 ポイント33 ポイント (16子コメント)
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-46 ポイント-45 ポイント-44 ポイント (15子コメント)
[–]RoverDude_KSPUSI Dev / Cat Herder[S] 28 ポイント29 ポイント30 ポイント (4子コメント)
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-44 ポイント-43 ポイント-42 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]CGLADOS 18 ポイント19 ポイント20 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]undercoveryankee 14 ポイント15 ポイント16 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]CoveredInBees1 13 ポイント14 ポイント15 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Taidashar 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Euryleia 13 ポイント14 ポイント15 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Captain_Planetesimal 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント (7子コメント)
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-35 ポイント-34 ポイント-33 ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]Captain_Planetesimal 17 ポイント18 ポイント19 ポイント (5子コメント)
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-35 ポイント-34 ポイント-33 ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]Captain_Planetesimal 14 ポイント15 ポイント16 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]IRLpuddles 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]western78 17 ポイント18 ポイント19 ポイント (24子コメント)
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-39 ポイント-38 ポイント-37 ポイント (23子コメント)
[–]RoverDude_KSPUSI Dev / Cat Herder[S] 33 ポイント34 ポイント35 ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]dwilliam16 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Antal_Marius 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Raysparks38 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]SweetPotardo 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-36 ポイント-35 ポイント-34 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]RoverDude_KSPUSI Dev / Cat Herder[S] 19 ポイント20 ポイント21 ポイント (1子コメント)
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-28 ポイント-27 ポイント-26 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]western78 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント (12子コメント)
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-29 ポイント-28 ポイント-27 ポイント (11子コメント)
[–]RoverDude_KSPUSI Dev / Cat Herder[S] 23 ポイント24 ポイント25 ポイント (10子コメント)
[–]ItFrightensMe 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]szepaine 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]MoeKin 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]MaturinTheTurtle スコアが基準値未満のコメント-21 ポイント-20 ポイント-19 ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]allert0n 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]BLueLightning0 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Jumpy89 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]sleepwalker77 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Shmeves 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]TotesMessenger 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)