あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]cuteman -14 ポイント-13 ポイント  (19子コメント)

ごめんなさい。これは既にアーカイブしてあり、もう投票はできません。

If there were better jobs in that country don't you think they would work there? They call it slave wages because the pay and conditions are below western standards, but they are not forced to be there.... Just because it doesn't meet your standards doesn't mean it isn't superior to the work and wages available otherwise.

Hence why, despite westerners criticizing Foxconn there is a HUGE demand for those jobs and a wait list to even be considered.

EDIT: if the average farmer's makes 1000 and the average factory worker makes 3000, it is no surprise at that at 6000-9000 foxconn jobs are in high demand. Suicide rates are much higher in the US than in Chinese factories. Yet apparently context counts for nothing.

[–]sandy_samoan 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (14子コメント)

ごめんなさい。これは既にアーカイブしてあり、もう投票はできません。

They aren't forced to be there? Except for the disappearance of work in rural China, the guards at the doors, the nets below the windows, the bars on the windows, the strictly regimented free time, the barracks on the factory campus, the wage pressure, the demands for cheap goods from westerners. Except those things, sure.

[–]NSojac 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

ごめんなさい。これは既にアーカイブしてあり、もう投票はできません。

Right. These companies are exploiting the desperation of these workers to pay them pittances, charge first world prices in america, and profit off the obscene difference. That is exactly the point of this original image. Whether or not these jobs are nominally voluntary or represent a marginal step-up in quality of life is not the subject of this thread.

[–]cuteman 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

ごめんなさい。これは既にアーカイブしてあり、もう投票はできません。

It's not exploitive if you are being paid well above the average of your country. Hence my comparison to our standard of living. It would be like paying you 100-150k a year to work in a warehouse. It's not glamorous or fun work but it's an easy way for people with no education or other job opportunities to make significantly above average income. That is also why there is so much demand for those jobs.

[–]NSojac 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

ごめんなさい。これは既にアーカイブしてあり、もう投票はできません。

Exploit as in the literal definition, to take advantage of a situation for your own benefit. But again the quality of life of a sweatshop laborer vis a vis their non-industrial counterparts is not the point of this image.

though this:

It would be like paying you 100-150k a year to work in a warehouse.

is almost certainly bullshit in absolute standard of living terms

[–]cuteman 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

ごめんなさい。これは既にアーカイブしてあり、もう投票はできません。

The point is even if the capitalist who moved a factory there is getting a rich, the workers who are employed there have a relatively higher income than without it. Therefore it is more of a symbiotic than parasitic relationship.

So I think it's a very poor choice of words to call it slave labor when the workers have many options at their disposal. And the fact remains they want to work there because the pay is higher than most other opportunities available to them.