//
Quickread
SECURITY WARNING: Please treat the URL above as you would your password and do not share it with anyone. See the Facebook Help Center for more information.
SECURITY WARNING: Please treat the URL above as you would your password and do not share it with anyone. See the Facebook Help Center for more information.
Huffpost Media
  • Like
    Like
    367k367k
  • Newsletters
    Get MediaNewsletters
  • Huffington Post Search
    Search The Huffington Post
Advertisement

Charlie Hebdo 'Wandered Into The Realm Of Hate Speech,' Says Doonesbury Cartoonist Garry Trudeau

Posted: Updated:
GARY TRUDEAU
FILE - In this April 5, 2008 file photo, Gary B. Trudeau, cartoonist and creator of "Doonesbury," speaks in New Haven, Conn. Universal Press Syndicate will offer replacement Doonesbury comic strips next week to newspapers that don't want to run a series focusing on a Texas law that requires women to have an ultrasound before getting an abortion, officials said Friday, March 9. 2012. (AP Photo/Douglas Healey, File) | ASSOCIATED PRESS
Famed Doonesbury cartoonist Garry Trudeau slammed his counterparts at Charlie Hebdo -- the French satirical newspaper that was attacked by terrorists in January -- at the George Polk journalism awards on Friday, saying their work “wandered into the realm of hate speech.” The attack on the publication, which has mocked Islam and other faiths in its pages, ignited a fierce international debate over free speech and racism.
“Free speech … becomes its own kind of fanaticism,” Trudeau said as he accepted a lifetime achievement award from the organization, adding that cartoonists' role is to “punch up” rather than down.

Around the Web

 
Click here to view Conversations

Conversations

Add a comment

 

.
 
.
.
.
  • Donna Montalbano · Top Commenter
    Has Trudeau ever watched Fox News? Talk about wandering into the realm of hate speech...
     
    .
    .
    .
    .
  • Ben Sak · Top Commenter
    In domestic violence this is called "victim blaming."

    "She was asking for it."
    • Danny Grey · Top Commenter
      Ben. Do you rape victims write articles disparaging the rapists and taunting them?
      How dare you compare these privileged white french males to rape victims!
      Reply · Like
      · 14 · April 10 at 2:03pm
      .
    • Danny Grey · Top Commenter
      If you knew how many innocent Africans were killed in the aftermath, the writers were not the victims.
      Reply · Like
      · 7 · April 10 at 2:07pm
      .
    • Chris Harriman · Top Commenter · Gorham, Maine
      Danny Grey Way to miss the point being made... Nobody is saying CH had the same experience as rape victims, that would be absurd (though honestly, being murdered isn't exactly a walk in the park), but there certainly is a similarity in seeing a person viciously attacked, and immediately looking for the ways in which the victim may have been asking for it. It does not denigrate rape victims to make this point, that is just silly.

      And, you may want to edit your first comment, because it sounds a lot like you're saying it's ok to murder someone who taunts you.
      Reply · Like
      · 9 · April 10 at 7:42pm
      .
     
    .
    .
    .
    .
  • Wade Marsten · Top Commenter
    Finally someone in the media who isn't blindly supporting Charlie Hebdo just because they went after the obvious enemy. Thoughtful people who really looked at some of the cartoons published by Hebdo knew this. Not a good martyr to rally behind though I agree the violent attack against them was cowardly and tragic.
    • Kimo Andrews · Top Commenter
      You are justifying murder over a cartoon. Aren't you all moral!
      Reply · Like
      · 33 · April 10 at 2:04pm
      .
    • Secularix Atheix
      You have no idea how depressing these kinds of comments are to a Frenchman. Taking their pictures at face value is the equivalent of taking Steven Colbert at face value. I don't really blame you, they're bound to be misread by foreigners, but it's still depressing.

      Tell you what, dig further and you'll notice some Muslims have worked for Charlie Hebdo. And I dare you to find a single French source calling them racists.
      Reply · Like
      · 23 · April 10 at 2:07pm
      .
    • Jim Marcum · Top Commenter · National University San Diego
      Here is what one Englishman thinks about showing all due respect to Muslims:

      https://dotsub.com/media/72457cbc-fe18-4053-ae3f-6c7639cf4e79/embed/
      Reply · Like
      · 11 · April 10 at 3:11pm
      .
     
    .
    .
    .
    .
  • Kevin AB · Top Commenter
    Gotta agree with Mr Trudeau.
     
    .
    .
    .
    .
  • Luc Capdeviele · Top Commenter
    It is true. Charlie Hebdo has abandoned its uplifting sarcasm to go cynically after Islam in, sometimes, insulting fashion. If it was hammering God and Jesus in the ways it portrayed Mohamed obsessively, hmm...lol, I know some Christian warriors who would have behave just like they do behave when they take the lives of doctors who provide abortions.
    • Luc Capdeviele · Top Commenter
      What I'm trying to say is that, here and there, some journalist are using the freedom of the press, like some Americans are using the freedom of speech, to advance their own anti-agenda with disrespect and insults.
      Reply · Like
      · 18 · April 10 at 1:35pm
      .
    • Jim Woodring
      Luc Capdeviele Whoa! Are you saying CH never went after Christ and Christians in the same satirical way? And WHAT uplifting sarcasm in the past? CH has always engaged in scabrous equal-opportunity insult humor.
      Reply · Like
      · 9 · April 10 at 5:04pm
      .
    • Darleen Click · Top Commenter
      You are asserting facts not in evidence. AND in an attempt to defend the indefensible.

      You should be ashamed.
      Reply · Like
      · 5 · April 10 at 5:50pm
      .
     
    .
    .
    .
    .
  • Septimus Yolander · Top Commenter · Austin, Texas
    He's right. There are a lot of topics/people that free speech allows cartoonists to make fun of but it doesn't mean they should make fun of every one. Just off the top of my head I can think of dozens - here are a few examples - children or adults who lost their hair from chemotherapy, Holocaust victims, rape victims, etc. Just because a cartoonist CAN do something as a cartoon doesn't mean that they SHOULD do it. If he wanted to make fun of religion, there are plenty examples of modern figures of all religions that can and should be mocked - there's no need to go after religious icons long since dead. Being a cartoonist always involves self censorship. Charlie was so obsessed with seeing how far he could push the envelope that he lost sight of that.
     
    .
    .
    .
    .
  • Dusty Rhodes · Princeton University
    Trudeau has a French sounding name. Maybe he thinks that makes him an authority on France, and on the context in which Charlie Hebdo published and wrote.

    And Trudeau doesn't draw very well, so maybe he thinks this places him on par with the often lazy, and occasionally inept art that appeared in Charlie Hebdo.

    I think he is grandstanding. And mostly wrong about this one. It's been said before, Charlie Hebdo was an equal opportunity offender who held the entitled out to dry.
    The dispute got real when Charlie Hebdo decided to carry water for the Danish cartoonist who was attacked a few years ago, and then, the offices of Charlie Hebdo were firebombed and destroyed roughly one year ago.
    This escaladed the tit for tat dispute between the magazine and the prophet.

    Some militants with guns paid them a visit and stopped their clo...ck.

    Get your act together Trudeau!

    The thing most Americans have difficulty with, it seems, is the depth of French secularism, and the fact that in Parisian French culture, the religious do not get to strut around with the swagger of entitlement they enjoy in the USA.
    A paper like Charlie Hebdo was especially good at pissing off the religious of any denomination.
    Hate Speech? Not really. Lampooning the stupid is more like it.

    Some things do not translate very well, and clearly, Charlie Hebdo is not a paper that was ever meant to be perused by hordes of politically correct Protestants, and sensitive NPR listeners in need of purging some personal agenda, but that's just what happened.

    Everybody became an expert on an essentially unknown rag - and everybody had an opinion about "what's really going on there."

    Now that the temporary meme high has passed, people are inclined to wonder what got into them in the first place, and out of shame, may need to revise their support. "JE SUIS CHARLIE" is revealed to be as empty as the fools who spread the fashion statement.

    Here's what happened: A bunch of elderly, White guys, cartoonists, who mostly have made enemies of everyone in politics and clergy in France for the last 40 years, got shot. Presidents and leaders rushed to be seen in the front line of a march for guys they'd just as soon have killed themselves if they could. Everyone used Charlie to trumpet some phony cry of solidarity... Solidarity for nothing at all. Of course we're all against killing cartoonists. And of course they were upwardly mobile White intellectuals. And of course we forgot about it all two weeks later. A million people came out in the street to express... What exactly?
    The French certainly know why they took to the streets, even if the rest of you can't work it out.
    Meanwhile, the same week that 2000 people were murdered in a bunch of Nigerian villages. And guess what stirred our passions?

    If that's not hate speech through omission, I don't know anything.
    See More
    • Thomas Daniel Kuhn · Top Commenter
      There are topics that can get you killed. Malcome X, Martin Luther King, just being black in America, Being black and walking in an unapproved manner in America, can all get you summarily excecuted by cop or fanatic. Cartoons that touch too firmly on certain subjects can get you killed as well. As blacks in the US can attest to, just because you have a right to, does not mean that it is prudent to do so. It can kill ya.
      Reply · Like
      · 3 · April 11 at 8:18am
      .
    • Frank Ch Eigler · Top Commenter
      Thomas Daniel Kuhn what's your opinion on the "her skirt was too shirt" theory?
      Reply · Like
      · 4 · April 11 at 11:20am
      .
    • Greg Edwards · Top Commenter · The School Of Hard Knocks
      Thomas Daniel Kuhn <--- Any newspaper worth reading, does not allow terrorists to dictate editorial policy. It's called credibility Thomas, and thankfully some publications still have it.
      Reply · Like
      · 1 · 21 hours ago
      .
     
    .
    .
    .
    .
  • Beth Reinard · Top Commenter
    Even though it was a horrific crime, I agree with GT. Charlie Hebdo should have had shown some restraint knowing who they were mocking.
     
    .
    .
    .
    .
  • Todd Minter · Top Commenter · University of Wisonsin-Madison
    One person's free speech is another person's hate speech, and vice versa. As soon as you start pretending that one kind of speech should be sanctioned and another censored, you must next as "by whom". The only kind of censorship should be self censorship; if you don't like the speech, stop listening/reading/watching.
    • Bro Johnnes
      Hate speech represents an existential threat to minorities. Every time I've been bashed for being gay or black, it always started with hate speech. When I was finally big enough to fight back, I was the only one ever charged with a crime even though they had assaulted me for years. The police just assumed me defending myself was an act of aggression. That's how institutional racism works.

      But I guess it's just an academic argument about freedom of speech for you. Must be nice.
      Reply · Like
      · 18 hours ago
      .
     
    .
    .
    .
    .
  • Ron Hak · Top Commenter · Michigan State University
    Henri Roussel, co-founder of Charlie Hebdo said that the magazine was overdoing it.
     
    .
    .
    .
    .
Advertisement
Advertisement

Suggested For You

These stories are recommended for you by Gravity.
The recommendations may include stories from our other publisher partners, some of whom pay to include their content here.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST

Use this form to alert a HuffPost editor about a factual or typographical error in this story.

Notify message
* Required
* * .
.
* What kind of error is this?
.
* What is the correction? 0 count
.
* Type the words below so we know you are not a cyborg


.
Thanks for your report!
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%