use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
詳しくは検索FAQを参照
高度な検索: 投稿者や、subredditで……
2,677 現在のここのユーザー
RULES & WIKI CURRENT THEME ARCHIVES RESOURCES R/MOVIES LITE NEW RELEASES
RULES & WIKI
CURRENT THEME
ARCHIVES
RESOURCES
R/MOVIES LITE
NEW RELEASES
/r/TrueFilm /r/Flicks /r/NetflixBestOf /r/ComicBookMovies /r/Filmmakers /r/MoviePosterPorn /r/CineShots /r/KickStarter
/r/TrueFilm
/r/Flicks
/r/NetflixBestOf
/r/ComicBookMovies
/r/Filmmakers
/r/MoviePosterPorn
/r/CineShots
/r/KickStarter
For leaked info about upcoming movies, twist endings, or anything else spoileresque, please use the following method: [Star Wars spoilers](#s "Yoda gets Darth Vader pregnant")
Is r/movies broken? Will it ever recover from the April fools massacre? (self.movies)
christophlc6 が 6 時間 前 投稿
残りのコメントをみる →
[–]MySeriousRedditAcct 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント 4 時間 前 (19子コメント)
It would be nice if someone would update the CSS back to the way it was. I'm still seeing "Underrated Gems" with the Nolantino Fight Club picture.
[–]NotUserHereYeHereYe -3 ポイント-2 ポイント-1 ポイント 4 時間 前 (18子コメント)
That is to remain and serve as a reminder. Just as a famous Russian Tsar decapitated the head of his wife's mistress and kept it in her bedroom as a cruel reminder, so too will Nolan's head remind you to keep it in your pants.
[–]MySeriousRedditAcct 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント 4 時間 前 (3子コメント)
I have no idea what any of that means, but clearly I hit a nerve. I guess it's time to unsubscribe.
[–]hunterbelmont 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 4 時間 前 (1子コメント)
Don't go. Mods and /r/moviescirclejerk just think they're better than everyone else, because they don't let themselves get excited about movies. They still make up a tiny minority of this subreddit.
[–]Krispykiwi 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 1 時間 前 (0子コメント)
Who says we don't let ourselves get excited about movies?
I'll be the first one splurging over Mad Max whenever a new trailer is announced. That movie looks dope as fuck right now. I, however, am not excited for the Avengers, and I have my reasons. For some reason if you are excited for the things other people are excited for, that's fair game, but if you aren't excited for things other people are excited for, you're just a group of sour krauts who don't know how to have fun and appreciate the movies.
The same goes for opinions on this subreddit. Say something in favour of the general populace with little to no reasoning explaining why? You're upvoted. Say something with or without reasoning that goes against it? You're downvoted. It's a double standard inherent to Reddit's form of content-sharing.
[+]NotUserHereYeHereYe スコアが基準値未満のコメント-13 ポイント-12 ポイント-11 ポイント 4 時間 前 (0子コメント)
Farewell friend!
[–]hunterbelmont 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 4 時間 前 (13子コメント)
But who's there to remind /r/moviescirclejerk not to circlejerk? Ironic shitposting is still shitposting, you know.
[–]NotUserHereYeHereYe -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 4 時間 前 (12子コメント)
You can come into /r/moviescirclejerk and tell us. We're very accommodating. /u/43352 often did that. He routinely warned us of the dangers of irony. You're more than welcome to fill his shoes if you think you have what it takes.
[–]CollumMcJingleballsMovie Score Aficionado -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 4 時間 前 (11子コメント)
This guy really thinks we hate the movies we're making fun of. It's cute.
[–]hunterbelmont -5 ポイント-4 ポイント-3 ポイント 4 時間 前 (10子コメント)
I think it's pretty clear you hate Interstellar, but I'm not about to blame you for that. Ultimately, it's not that you hate most of the stuff liked on /r/movies, as much as you think everything is overrated. You're like those goth kids who think that acting cool blooded about everything is a sign of maturity.
/r/movies says Wolf of Wallstreet is 10/10? Nah, it's 7/10 at best.
/r/movies says Inglourious Basterds is 9/10? Sorry, 5/10 is best I can do.
/r/movies says Transformers 2 is a bad movie? Well, yeah, but I'm not going to give you the satisfaction of agreeing.
That's how /r/moviescirclejerk works.
[–]DiaboliAdvocatus 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 3 時間 前 (0子コメント)
Every circlejerk sub is a bunch of posers trying to make themselves look better than others by being "ironic".
[–]CollumMcJingleballsMovie Score Aficionado -5 ポイント-4 ポイント-3 ポイント 3 時間 前* (1子コメント)
hahahahahahaha I actually liked Interstellar. Do I think it's the greatest movie of all time? No. But you'll find plenty of testimonials as to how it has literally changed the lives of people and that's funny. I've had a hard time having a discussion about it because people here either post that it changed their lives or it's the dumbest thing ever conceived. The 10,000th thread about it won't change the fact that the discussion is going to end up being the same repetitive trope of people believing there's some sort of vilification and persecution on that movie.
/r/moviesciclejerk makes fun of the the conversational tropes and when we make fun of a movie we do it out of love. You really think we hate all movies don't you? You also think that if we don't go along with the /r/movies consensus then it means we hate the movie and that's really, really naive. You think people having other opinions about films aren't conducive to a healthy discourse and that's sad.
You've been here for five days. It's pretty clear you don't know how either /r/movies or /r/moviescirclejerk are and you're going around this thread making assumptions with no proof. I would try to get to know the subreddit you're posting in and the regulars who post here too before making while assumptions like that.
[+]NotUserHereYeHereYe スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント 3 時間 前 (6子コメント)
Why are we goth kids? Do they even exist anymore? I thought goths went out in the 90s... In fact, most 'goths' I've chatted with have tended to be nice, upbeat people.
Actually, I think Wolf of Wall Street is probably 7/10. This is a common opinion, which I'd love to (and have) discuss/ed. I think Mark Kermode highlights why this struggles pretty clearly: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ot0KC1s1U1g&spfreload=10
The film is flawed at the script level in that they failed to find an in for the character. The character is too hateful to empathise with. Some critics have said it romanticises the character, but that's nonsense. I just hated the central character, despite a great performance. This is something the script of Goodfellas did manage. Despite his abhorrence, he was the underdog, so we had a level of sympathy for him (although this, I would argue, was ultimately lost by the end of the film). So yes, I actually do think Wolf of Wall Street was overrated and praised in part because it reminded people of Goodfellas and that it lacked the strengths of that film. This has been discussed in /r/flicks. It's a valid opinion and I don't see why that makes me or anyone else 'pretentious'. What is pretentious is /r/movies downvoting people expressing an opinion like that, which they would if someone posted a thread that said 'ISN'T WOLF OF WALL STREET A GREAT FILM?'
[–]hunterbelmont -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 3 時間 前 (5子コメント)
Why are we goth kids? Do they even exist anymore?
"Hipster" is overused. I'm comparing you to a teenage/college clique that is concerned about image and the appearance of composure.
Some critics have said it romanticises the character, but that's nonsense.
I'd say the characters are romanticized. They do pretty abhorrent things, and in real life, we would see them as sleazy criminals. But the movie makes you laugh with them. The little humor inserts, like the Popeye theme playing when he takes a shot of coke, masks how bad some of the things they're doing is, making it seem more cartoony and innocuous.
So yes, I actually do think Wolf of Wall Street was overrated
The bigger point is that /r/moviescirclejerk things that there's no way that anyone should rate it as a 10/10 film.
See, I somewhat disagree with your rating of the movie, but I can see why you feel that way. Similarly, I can see why people were blown away by the film. It's smart, doesn't feel its length, and gets you to like characters that are a challenge to like. I don't personally rate it as 10/10, but I don't blame people who do, either. What I'm saying is that the bad guy in this equation is the one who says, "You rated it that? You must be an immature circlejerker who isn't seeing it objectively!"
[–]NotUserHereYeHereYe -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 1 時間 前 (2子コメント)
But the movie makes you laugh with them.
Not really. While the character acting has a level of charm, mostly we are laughing at them. Which works well in say the car crash sequence... but ultimately the characters are simply hateful. The Popeye thing had an impact, but it didn't remove moral judgement in the slightest from the overall picture.
The bigger point is that /r/moviescirclejerk things [sic] that there's no way that anyone should rate it as a 10/10 film.
Sorry, where do you get this from? Because there are a handful of recent films we think don't deserve to be automatically canonized?
doesn't feel its length
Sorry, that was an extremely flabby movie. Most critics agreed on this. There were any number of set pieces that were just yet another debauchery that made exactly the same point.
gets you to like characters that are a challenge to like
I just said it didn't. Why did you just ignore everything I said and the reasons I gave, and then just state the opposite like it's fact? You've failed to engage with me in a discussion. You're exactly the problem with /r/movies. You have failed to discuss.
I don't personally rate it as 10/10, but I don't blame people who do, either.
I don't blame anyone who does provided they justify their reasons. You haven't done that. Also, you said 'haha, moviecirclejerkers only rate Wolf of Wall Street 7/10', but then turn around and say you don't rate it '10/10'.
"You rated it that? You must be an immature circlejerker who isn't seeing it objectively!"
I'm accusing you here of not once talking about the film itself. The comments you just made did not resemble the film I saw and made no direct reference to the film in question.
You just pretty clearly demonstrated the problem while trying to defend it.
[–]hunterbelmont -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 1 時間 前 (1子コメント)
but ultimately the characters are simply hateful
They do hateful things, but you have DiCapprio talking directly to the camera at the audience. I think you're supposed to sympathize with the characters and even root for them at times.
Because the existence of /r/moviescirclejerk consists of getting angry at people liking movies too much.
I just said it didn't. Why did you just ignore everything I said and the reasons I gave, and then just state the opposite like it's fact?
I reread what you said on this subject, and it was basically just "I didn't like the characters because they did bad things". Don't act like you made some masterfully analytical point that I glossed over.
What I'm saying is that the movie wants you to sympathize with the character. Maybe it didn't work for you, but the intent is clearly there. The scene with the protagonist leaving his first wife could have been so much worse. I doubt that in real life the guy's wife said, "This this what you really want?" before silently accepting it. It was probably much uglier, but the movie doesn't paint it that bad, because that would have made everyone hate the guy right away.
[–]CollumMcJingleballsMovie Score Aficionado 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 3 時間 前 (1子コメント)
For someone making the claim about blanket statements you're going about this thread making a lot of blanket statements like that.
[–]Krispykiwi 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 1 時間 前 (0子コメント)
Remember, as long as it's a blanket statement that supports your argument, that makes it okay. QED.
π Rendered by PID 24354 on app-279 at 2015-04-04 07:01:05.096126+00:00 running a35652b country code: JP.
残りのコメントをみる →
[–]MySeriousRedditAcct 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント (19子コメント)
[–]NotUserHereYeHereYe -3 ポイント-2 ポイント-1 ポイント (18子コメント)
[–]MySeriousRedditAcct 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]hunterbelmont 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Krispykiwi 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]NotUserHereYeHereYe スコアが基準値未満のコメント-13 ポイント-12 ポイント-11 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]hunterbelmont 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (13子コメント)
[–]NotUserHereYeHereYe -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (12子コメント)
[–]CollumMcJingleballsMovie Score Aficionado -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (11子コメント)
[–]hunterbelmont -5 ポイント-4 ポイント-3 ポイント (10子コメント)
[–]DiaboliAdvocatus 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]CollumMcJingleballsMovie Score Aficionado -5 ポイント-4 ポイント-3 ポイント (1子コメント)
[+]NotUserHereYeHereYe スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]hunterbelmont -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]NotUserHereYeHereYe -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]hunterbelmont -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]CollumMcJingleballsMovie Score Aficionado 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Krispykiwi 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)