104
105

Our New State Motto (pbs.twimg.com)

CasualTerror が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ
新着
注目
論争中
古い順
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]spoon404 -6 ポイント-5 ポイント  (10子コメント)

i understand the point of the joke, but the law didn't allow for that. http://joshblackman.com/blog/2015/03/26/comparing-the-federal-rfra-and-the-indiana-rfra/

[–]EqualOrLessThan2 16 ポイント17 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You cite a right-wing blog as evidence?

The law certainly does allow for discrimination, but that's just the start of it! It overrides any state or local law if you can say you have "religious convictions". The burden of proof is on the state.

[–]PollutionZero 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (8子コメント)

The entire point of the law is to allow someone to say, "My religion hate's you. We don't serve your kind here."

Otherwise, there's no point in the law.

It's intended to allow people to openly discriminate against LGBT.

Anyone who says otherwise is lying to themselves.

[–]systemErr -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (7子コメント)

You are completely right. No point otherwise.

So is there anything preventing a business in Indiana from just changing their policy daily. I mean, if they wanted predomininently white customers. Couldn't they just refuse the most common non-white religions... And if any non-white claimed another religion, just say "well that too". Then start demanding to know your customers religion before entry?

Feels like Indiana is going back 50 years, WTF

[–]jefferyffe -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (6子コメント)

Indiana's always been behind 50 years.

[–]NoTimeForPoopin 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Wait... So it's actually 1965 here? Far out.

[–]jefferyffe -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

let me rephrase that it's always 1810 in Indiana.

[–]NoTimeForPoopin 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Indiana wasn't a state in 1810.

[–]jefferyffe -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (1子コメント)

okay fine where it's always 1813.

[–]NoTimeForPoopin 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Warmer. First off, Indiana is not 50 years behind, it's 40, be be exact. 1816-1776=40. Also, learn some god damn history, son.

[–]slamdunkbrunch 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

No, it's not. Indiana's not as progressive as the coasts, but we were the 20th state to get gay marriage. It's a typical Midwestern state - not the Deep South.