My point is that Hillary is being misconstrued.

I think people are getting her point just fine.

Of course anyone forced on pain of death into fighting a war is a victim.

As long as those victims are women, right?

A participant is not.

Yes they are.

And while one can say it's noble to defend your own, this disregards the fact that 99% of all wars and conflicts are started and fought by men, not women.

Fought by men, not women, huh? I guess that'd make men the primary victims then.

Two gang members shooting at each other aren't victims. A bystander being hit is.

Sure they are. They're victims of each other's violence.

Again, that is not to say that men can't be victims, but Hillery is right.

But by your own logic of 99% of wars and conflicts being fought by men, they very much are victims.

Women are the primary victims, as they are the least likely to be participants.

First up, no, they're not. Secondary, more likely. The men that die are the primary victims. Secondly, what does that even mean? They're primary victims because they're not the ones getting shot at? Christ.

At least you're upfront about hating men.