use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
詳しくは検索FAQを参照
高度な検索: 投稿者や、subredditで……
~4 現在のここのユーザー
A place for discussions on bans, changes and whatnot of /r/anarchism by its active anarchists who have an interest in the well-being of the community.
Relevant topics:
How does this place work?
Transparency:
Proposal: community response to /u/reaganveg (self.metanarchism)
needstrangersadvice が 27 日 前 投稿
残りのコメントをみる →
[–]Hannibal_Lecturer 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 26 日 前 (21子コメント)
Oh, for fucks sake, it's not even 10 days since the last vote to ban reaganveg for the exact same reason failed! One that was 250 comments long and in which pretty much every regular chimed in to boot. No further development has happened since then and if half of the mods didn't have a grudge against reaganveg themselves the thread would have been already been removed because you can't keep posting ban threads about people you dislike and hope one passes.
Of course the meta lacks legitimacy and mentioning it doesn't ruin anyone's day. It manages to self select for jerks who try to satisfy their power fantasies with the most inconsequential shit imaginable, stubborn jerks who like to oppose them and the occasional sociopath. It has 50 regulars speaking for a community that is -on paper- 50.000 strong. Everyone with a better sense or better intentions or at least with something better to do has already left.
Oppose but hopefully it won't have to come to that.
[–]flaxrabbit🐰 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント 26 日 前* (2子コメント)
I agree with your analysis regarding immediate rehashing of proposals when no substantive change has taken place. I brought this up the other day in Rita5's unban thread (made 1 day after the proposal to ban them passed) and proposed that that thread be removed as spam. No one supported that idea, and a few people opposed it.
It seems like we need some sort of guideline to differentiate spam from new proposals.
This thread just seems like a waste of time to me as we know that there isn't anything close to consensus about how to deal with reaganveg.
[–]sillandria 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 26 日 前 (1子コメント)
Maybe instead of trying to ban anyone we first have a debate thread about how to deal with people that are perceived as disrupting conversation without technically violating the AOP, and then from there re-admit this ban thread under the new guidelines and see what happens?
[–]zeabu -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 24 日 前 (0子コメント)
So, adapting the rules retroactively?
[–]Vindalfr 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 26 日 前 (5子コメント)
What about the weekly ban threads for users you didn't like?
[–]needstrangersadvice[S] 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 26 日 前 (0子コメント)
Obviously thats different, cuz reasons.</s>
[–]Hannibal_Lecturer -3 ポイント-2 ポイント-1 ポイント 26 日 前 (3子コメント)
You mean for users who managed to tell enough new users to kill themselves, or amp the graphic descriptions of how they want them killed within that week who then sought a ban? Because even so, I don't remember such or similarly comically short periods of time without absolutely changing within that week (with the exception of a warning and a ban thread for the same user running simultaneously) being customary.
[–]Vindalfr 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 26 日 前 (2子コメント)
It absolutely was and it was absolutely justified.
Other than the tone of the statements and the expanded vocabulary, the behavior and unwillingness to engage is hauntingly similar.
[–]reaganveg -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 25 日 前 (1子コメント)
the behavior and unwillingness to engage is hauntingly similar.
...when in reality, I am more willing to engage than almost anyone else here, and behave in a totally opposite manner to volcanoclosto...
[–]lilit_ 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 25 日 前 (0子コメント)
Good joke lmao
[–]needstrangersadvice[S] 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 26 日 前 (1子コメント)
Of course the meta lacks legitimacy
It's as legit as we make/believe it to be. Why even participate if you think its all spectacle?
because it affects another sub.
[–]needstrangersadvice[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 26 日 前 (8子コメント)
We have no provisions for limiting thread proposals, and I think this is the way to handle it. reaganveg seems content to participate in a way I, and many others, find disruptive. They won't accept that feedback, despite hearing it from multiple people, so group pressure is effectively the only tool I as a non-mod have left.
EDIT:Meet one asshole, they're an asshole. Everyone around you an asshole? Maybe your the asshole.
[–]a_pale_horse 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 25 日 前 (4子コメント)
You're exploiting process in order to get your way - which, shockingly, was the exact reasoning given by the last person who proposed this ban - I can't see how this proposal isn't in bad faith to begin with, especially considering it depends on non-participation of people who aren't involved with a governing body.
[–]lilit_ 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 25 日 前 (3子コメント)
Gb2 nambla
[–]a_pale_horse -3 ポイント-2 ポイント-1 ポイント 25 日 前 (2子コメント)
oh dude, you're back? i thought you'd reconsidered baiting people here when you deleted your last comments. glad you're keeping it real, tho.
[–][削除されました] 25 日 前 (1子コメント)
[deleted]
[–]a_pale_horse -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 25 日 前 (0子コメント)
as uncomfortable as it might make them, i'm not sure my neighbors need to know that I ate three pizzas in one day last month.
[–]reaganveg -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 25 日 前 (0子コメント)
LOL @ "everyone around you"
Maybe if I was really so isolated that the tiny cultish clique of childish liars that dominate this space were my sole source of social feedback, I'd be that easy to brainwash. Thankfully not.
[–]Min_thamee -5 ポイント-4 ポイント-3 ポイント 25 日 前 (1子コメント)
Meet one asshole, they're an asshole. Everyone around you an asshole? Maybe your the asshole
take your own advice lol.
[–]boilerpunx 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 25 日 前 (0子コメント)
Pssst, I think you're one of the ass holes. Also that wasn't really advice
π Rendered by PID 6144 on app-62 at 2015-04-02 06:26:22.938057+00:00 running 69466bd country code: JP.
残りのコメントをみる →
[–]Hannibal_Lecturer 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (21子コメント)
[–]flaxrabbit🐰 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]sillandria 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]zeabu -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Vindalfr 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]needstrangersadvice[S] 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Hannibal_Lecturer -3 ポイント-2 ポイント-1 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Vindalfr 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]reaganveg -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]lilit_ 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]needstrangersadvice[S] 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]zeabu -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]needstrangersadvice[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]a_pale_horse 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]lilit_ 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]a_pale_horse -3 ポイント-2 ポイント-1 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–][削除されました] (1子コメント)
[deleted]
[–]a_pale_horse -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]reaganveg -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Min_thamee -5 ポイント-4 ポイント-3 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]boilerpunx 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (0子コメント)