(cache) rayditeがBusta Rhymes putting an ignorant fan in her placeについて記入したコメント

Rules		Description
1. No politics		Political videos (including ones related to current political figures) should be submitted to r/politics, r/worldpolitics, etc.
2. No personal information		Such as names, Facebook pages, phone numbers, addresses, etc. This is grounds for an immediate (and likely permanent) ban, so consider this a warning.
3. No witch-hunting		Or incitement to witch hunt. This means no demanding "Reddit justice" in any way in post titles or comments.
4. No videos of police brutality or police harassment		Consider submitting those to a different subreddit, like /r/Bad_Cop_No_Donut or elsewhere.
5. Submit direct link to video		(no web pages that only embed Youtube or Vimeo videos). No URL shorteners. No links to playlists or to channel pages.
6. No porn or gore		There are many other subreddits for such content.
7. No solicitation of votes or views. No asking for votes or sharing submission links on or off-site (Facebook, Twitter, etc)		Violations can lead to permanent ban of accounts and video channel.
8. No commenting with racial slurs		Self-explanatory
9. No videos of real-life, malicious person-on-person assault/battery.		This includes raw videos of fights.

342

343

344

Busta Rhymes putting an ignorant fan in her place (youtu.be)

JaySpike が 15 時間前投稿

あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]dobbyschmurda 189 ポイント190 ポイント191 ポイント 14 時間前 (10子コメント)

[–]raydite -16 ポイント-15 ポイント-14 ポイント 5 時間前* (9子コメント)

I think if you want your kids to get a picture with Busta Rhymes, you can't take the moral high ground by playing the language card.

The thing isn't that - this is the thing: she's being completely inconsiderate of another human being - Mr. Busta Rhymes - then whining about and trying to 'get consideration' for herself or her children.

This is why some men hate women, sorry ladies, if you expect nothing but consideration for yourselves from humanity but while consistently expecting to be able to give none in return while still holding some kind of place on an imaginary collective pedestal, you're going to have a bad time when you meet someone who has a brain and respects themselves. Busta just told you to go fuck yourself for being a bitch and you wanted to pretend you weren't being one and somehow "turn it around on him", because you are in fact a fucking inconsiderate, brainless female dog.

This is a video of what happens when self-absorbed, british, and ugly meets self-respecting American artist. Go back to your caves and leave your young in the care of someone who is a more suitable parental figure.

[–]ComradePyro 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 3 時間前 (8子コメント)

[+]raydite スコアが基準値未満のコメント-12 ポイント-11 ポイント-10 ポイント 2 時間前* (7子コメント)

way to prove my point, go back to your cyber-lair feminism, off with you, no one needs your lack of consideration for others and your attempts to make yourself feel better about yourself by doubling-down on it when someone points out something that portrays women in anything other than a 99.99999999999% positive light of wonderful perfection(women are just people, there's nothing different about putting words to their actions than there is about men, it's just there are women out there who hate it).

You might think "trashy people are trashy people", but can you see any guy doing what these girls were doing there? I don't mean trying to get a celeb to sign an autograph, I mean talking back to one while being rejected and called out on your lack of consideration for other humans. Can anyone link me to a video of a guy doing that? Anyone? No, because men are immediately called on their shit by other people unless they are rich or powerful or surrounded by sycophants.

[–]ComradePyro 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 2 時間前 (6子コメント)

[–]raydite -4 ポイント-3 ポイント-2 ポイント 2 時間前* (5子コメント)

I'm a little bit of both actually thank you for taking the time out of your day to notice me, but you're the one who is more likely to go shoot stuff, maybe you're even in the army or something, something very normal that you don't realize is actually based on shooting stuff while you drink your beers and watch TV and think of yourself as being a good and relatively intelligent person.

or, maybe, like I said - you're just a girl being spiteful and attacking someone on the internet who portrayed women in anything other than a 99.999999% positive light, which doesn't jive with the security of your own ego - even though they're just people - and people tend to act horrible when no one calls them on their shit - like you for example - maybe you could post my "bad horribleness" somewhere for other people to stalk me on the internet and attack me(something I would never do because I'm not insane or a shallow egotist - which isn't your fault, by the way or the fault of anyone who does this, they're just victims of the culture they grew up in which left them the way they are seeking self-gratification and narcissistic source material on the internet) - because I'm so bad, and you're so great, and I'm so nuts, and you're so sane.

p.s. this is either a pretty well-done troll or you're a sad human being

this is what I feel about almost every post on reddit that I come across, and it's true for the ladies in this video as well(but whoops, now I'm an insane person for pointing it out, because you have long hair and you can't use me to feed your ego[without personally attacking me, and doing so in such a way that it's basically mental masturbation to your own self-image "lol, hokay, let me know when, you're a horrible human being for pointing out the truth about people I identify with purely by chance of my birth"] and it bothers you).

Yuck, I feel like going and taking a shower.

[–]ComradePyro 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 1 時間前 (4子コメント)

Lol, I'm about as far from being in the army as you can get, and I don't watch TV. Oh, and I'm a man, sorry about not fitting into your weird misogynist fantasy.

I'm making fun of you because you're painting with a broad brush named Naivete. These women acted like idiots, but men are just as capable of acting like idiots in the exact same way. Their gender is, as you put it, "purely by chance of [their] birth", and not at all relevant to the video. You have problems with women, though, so in your head, their gender is relevant to their actions.

Cue some bullshit about how men act less entitled than women, undoubtedly to be supported by your very reliable anecdotal evidence.

I think I might be able to clarify something for you here.

being spiteful and attacking someone on the internet who portrayed women in anything other than a 99.999999% positive light

What you don't realize is that if you were to do the same thing to men, and not women, I would do the same thing as I did here, but the word would be "misandrist" and not "misogynist". If you ascribe a quality/trait or a set of qualities/traits to an entire race, you are a racist. Similarly, since you keep talking about "women" as though "women" was a homogenous group or even a single, unified entity, you are a naive misogynist.

I understand women can do bad, it's not hard. What you don't understand is that their gender is not very relevant to their doing bad. Hell, if gender were relevant, you'd be more justified in being a misandrist than a misogynist, not a whole helluva lot of female Hitlers and Maos. Guess what though? Their genders, too, are incidental to the acts they committed.

And that's my daily allotted amount of wasted time. Have a good one, bud, and try to work on figuring out why you're so mad at women.

[–]raydite -5 ポイント-4 ポイント-3 ポイント 1 時間前* (3子コメント)

Lol, I'm about as far from being in the army as you can get, and I don't watch TV. Oh, and I'm a man, sorry about not fitting into your weird misogynist fantasy.

you're living in a fantasy because there's nothing "misogynist" about me, stop pushing your own bullshit here, I'm not a soap box, the people in the video are all humans, humans act badly when their behavior is not seen for what it is by their peers - and I'm telling you what yours is, because you are either blindly trumpeting a cause that you believe in using me to do it(wrongly so), or whining at me because you accidentally missed the fact that nothing I said is at all misogynistic.

Men act the way they do because if they try to act like scumbags, people call them on it. When someone tries to call a woman on it(as in, another person with different biological features) - someone like YOU crawls out of the woodwork to stamp on them or try to make them feel bad to make yourself feel good - usually trying to include as many others in your act of imagined righting of injustice as possible by linking your post somewhere else, I wonder if you did that.

back your righteous indignation up and drive away please, we don't need any of your brand of it here, there is nothing wrong with referring to women as women, just as there is nothing wrong with referring to men as men - if I say "this is why men develop this way" in terms of "if a man is able to act like a complete scumbag and has no one to call him on it, he will be that way" -- there isn't a SINGLE THING "anti-male" about that, it is just reality. It's like saying I'm "anti-human" for calling a person a person, "oh you're distinguishing them from other life forms and using culturally-normative descriptive terms that aren't natural". It's just silly, "hokay".

[–]ComradePyro 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 時間前 (1子コメント)

When someone tries to call a woman on it(as in, another person with different biological features) - someone like YOU crawls out of the woodwork to stamp on them or try to make them feel bad to make yourself feel good - usually trying to include as many others in your act of imagined righting of injustice as possible by linking your post somewhere else, I wonder if you did that.

Except I said multiple times she acted like a dickhead. You're the one who kept saying "women" "ladies" "female" etc. Her gender is all over your post, despite its irrelevance.

To spell it out for you: I don't object to you calling a dickhead a dickhead, I objected to you making it a gender politics issue. "YOU" are the opposite extreme to the people you keep trying to lump me in with. They needlessly make things about gender when gender is irrelevant, and that's exactly what you did.

You are so much like the people you continually try to group me with, and you don't even know it. Poor little man.

[–]raydite -3 ポイント-2 ポイント-1 ポイント 1 時間前* (0子コメント)

There is nothing wrong with referring to women as women, just as there is nothing wrong with referring to men as men - if I say "this is why men develop this way" in terms of "if a man is able to act like a complete scumbag and has no one to call him on it, he will be that way because he has no reason to care" -- there isn't a SINGLE THING "anti-male" about that, it is just reality. It's like saying I'm "anti-human" for calling a person a person, "oh you're distinguishing them from other life forms and using culturally-normative descriptive terms that aren't natural so you are just so full of hate". It's just silly, "hokay".

Men and women are distinct from one another, so we use distinct words to describe them. I would say you are the one who is pushing inequality in simple use of language here, not me. It's like me describing black people's behavior which is different (due to their cultural differences we need different identifying terms, the same as genders have cultures of their own) - it's not racist, and it's not sexist, I'm not saying what you seem to think I'm saying.

π Rendered by PID 23948 on app-179 at 2015-03-31 15:25:48.159000+00:00 running a790103 country code: JP.

videos

Rules

Recommended subreddits

調停者