あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]Ksanti [非表示スコア]  (48子コメント)

Faked, quite badly I might add.

The windmill wouldn't be in focus as what you'd need to be focused on is light maybe 2 feet further away from the actual windmill - focusing on a reflection still means you need to focus the distance from lens to surface PLUS surface to object, not just lens to surface.

TL;DR if the reflection like that was in focus, the actual windmill should be focus as well.

[–]InFunkWeTrust [非表示スコア]  (0子コメント)

Yeah at first I was thinking it was very impressive, then in my mind as a photographer I couldn't figure out how that angle works, it didn't feel natural or make sense. Shouldn't the lens of the camra just be kind of a repeating image of him pointing the camera at the mirror, or the side of the car? Also if his lens is that reflective, wouldn't it take in a probably very low amount light thus making a crisp handheld shot impossible? I've worked with tinted reflective surfaces, and to get clean reflections you need to have the background be extremely dark, you should be able to see some of the camera bits like more camera selfies.

[–]Shity_Balls [非表示スコア]  (0子コメント)

Plus the clouds are just slightly different! if you compare them side-by-side and look at where the light is being let inbetween the clouds, some of the sections don't exist in both pictures.

[–]AmorphousGamer [非表示スコア]  (0子コメント)

Non-photographer here. I'm very confused. Is there any way you can explain why this is so obviously faked (or why this picture would be noteworthy if it wasn't?)

This whole post and the shitstorm it seems to have caused is completely over my head.

[–]mckulty [非表示スコア]  (0子コメント)

Yup. The windmill should be in equally bad focus in the lens filter.

You could do this, but the lens filter would have to have curvature on its the front surface, maybe -0.50D.

Also most lens filters have some AR coating that would mute the intensity of this reflection by 2-3 f-stops. Here it's nice and bright.

[–]mynameisntjeffrey [非表示スコア]  (2子コメント)

Couldn't the slight curvature of the mirror be used as a kind of focusing lens that could potentially focus it? Not trying to debate you or anything, I'm honestly curious.

[–]Ksanti [非表示スコア]  (0子コメント)

Nope, it would have to be hugely curved to be able to make up for a several thousand percent difference in focusing distances

[–]persiyan [非表示スコア]  (0子コメント)

That is not a reflection you'd get off pf a lens glass, this could be a filter on the lens.

[–]DominusDeus [非表示スコア]  (2子コメント)

Pretty sure OP has a filter on the cameras lens, probably a UV filter. The filter is reflecting the windmill on to the sideview mirror. All the camera has to do is focus on the lens via the sideview mirror and it'll have a focused shot of what the lens filter is reflecting. In this case, the windmill.

[–]Ksanti [非表示スコア]  (1子コメント)

That's not how focusing on reflections works. If you focus on your reflection in a mirror, for example, you have to focus on light that has travelled from you, to the mirror, AND back again ie twice as far away as the mirror.

[–]mckulty [非表示スコア]  (0子コメント)

In this case, the principal object is about 150 meters.

The reflection adds about 1-2 m max.

152 m vs 150 m the focus should be the same.