SECURITY WARNING: Please treat the URL above as you would your password and do not share it with anyone. See the Facebook Help Center for more information.
SECURITY WARNING: Please treat the URL above as you would your password and do not share it with anyone. See the Facebook Help Center for more information.

Idiocracy Is a Cruel Movie And You Should Be Ashamed For Liking It

Idiocracy Is a Cruel Movie And You Should Be Ashamed For Liking It 1
s
this looks like san bernardino. brought to you by carl's jr
Remember that 2006 movie Idiocracy? The one where Luke Wilson plays an average underachiever who wakes up 500 years in the future, only to realize that he's now the smartest person on Earth? And everyone else is dumb — like, really dumb? Well, that movie is cruel and terrible and you should be ashamed for liking it. Seriously. N
Idiocracy is the new cultural touchstone for discussing America's cultural and educational decline. I see references to the film in my social media streams nearly every day. Do a quick search, and you'll see people are referencing the film in some capacity about 5-10 times an hour on social media. "I hate that Idiocracy is basically a documentary," writes one distraught tweeter in what's now a common complaint when talking about anything from politics to sports to entertainment. 2
s
the worst thing is that people who say things like "Idiocracy is basically a documentary" or "think of how dumb the average person is, then realize half of the people are even dumber" are assuming which side of the bell curve they're on. Saying those things doesn't put you on the "smart" side of the curve, it just makes you an arrogant, self-absorbed asshole. And we have WAY too many of those.
N
We use pop culture as a shorthand to talk about the way we see the future of society and ourselves. Sometimes we use Star Trek to talk about communication technologies; other times we reference Minority Report when we're talking about innovative UI experiences; and we use The Jetsons for everything from flying cars to robot maids to just a general sense of future-ness. It's been over half a century since it debuted, and we're still using The Jetsons. N
But Idiocracy is now our point of reference for the dumbing down of society. Whereas previous generations had movies like Network (1976) that challenged our understanding of possible media-driven futures, millennials have Idiocracy. And while the film expresses an arguably legitimate frustration with our current cultural landscape, it also leads us down a strange and illogical path for creating a better future. N
In the movie, a nation of imbeciles sit around watching the fictional TV show "Ow My Balls," while furiously masturbating and eating garbage food. People have become completely dependent upon automation (including robo-medicine) and are too dumb to fix anything. Is this funny? Sure. As an over-the-top comedic dystopia, the movie is actually enjoyable. But the movie's introduction makes it an unnerving reference to toss around as our go-to insult. 3
s
If you haven't seen it, look up the MTV show "Ridiculousness." It's basically the same show as "Ow, My Balls." The future is now!
N
From the opening narration of the movie: N
As the twenty-first century began, human evolution was at a turning point. Natural selection, the process by which the strongest, the smartest, the fastest reproduced in greater numbers than the rest, a process which had once favored the noblest traits of man, now began to favor different traits. N
Most science fiction of the day predicted a future that was more civilized and more intelligent. But as time went on, things seemed to be heading in the opposite direction — a dumbing down. How did this happen? Evolution does not necessarily reward intelligence. With no natural predators to thin the herd, it began to simply reward those who reproduced the most and left the intelligent to become an endangered species.
N
What's so wrong with this thinking? Unlike other films that satirize the media and the soul-crushing consequences of sensationalized entertainment (my personal favorite being 1951's Ace in the Hole), Idiocracy lays the blame at the feet of an undeserved target (the poor) while implicitly advocating a terrible solution (eugenics). The movie's underlying premise is a fundamentally dangerous and backwards way to understand the world. 4
s
This is the dumbest thing I've read today. And I was on Buzzfeed earlier.
5
s
No, it blames the careless clowns who do nothing but eat and screw. They prosper without effort because the hard work of others benefits society at large. Indeed I'd go further than that. At my day job the screw-clowns slack the worst, self-promote the best, and breed the most.
N
Idiocracy Is a Cruel Movie And You Should Be Ashamed For Liking It 6
s
Armando Ianucci, is that you?
The origin story for Idiocracy's future world of half-wits is that uneducated people in the early 2000s are having kids and smart people don't reproduce enough. It's clear from the film that the intelligent people are wealthy, while the uneducated people are poor. So we're starting from a position of believing that wealthy people are inherently more intelligent and, by extension, deserve their wealth. This link between intelligence and wealth is perhaps the most dangerous idea of the film and pretty quickly slips into advocating for some form of soft eugenics to build a better world. 7
s
I do not stick by this interpretation. Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding of the movie was that people were driving themselves to poverty by having more children than they were able to support.
8
s
That's a pretty big leap of logic you just made right there. Your excessive liberal bias is showing... you need more schadenfreude to cover it up.
9
s
"So we're starting from a position of believing that wealthy people are inherently more intelligent and, by extension, deserve their wealth."
N
If only we could get rid of the uneducated Americans (read: redneck poors) and we'll have the opportunity to live in a utopian world filled with smart and civilized people. Of course, everyone here in 2014 making a reference to Idiocracy as a pseudo-documentary identifies with the soon-to-be-extinct intelligent class. They believe it's the "others" — the dumb, impoverished people — that are ruining America with their binging on crap TV and crap internet and crap food. 10
s
They say this while discussing Game of Thrones on Facebook. Cognitive Dissonance is a potent drug.
N
Idiocracy Is a Cruel Movie And You Should Be Ashamed For Liking It
We hear it every day: Buzzfeed listicles, cute animal slideshows, and reality TV are destroying America. But in some form or another, they always have been. Or at least that's what we've told ourselves. We romanticize the past, and think that everybody used to sit around spending their leisure time reading dense literature and debating philosophy or something. But guess what? We've always seen ourselves as vapid and terrible. N
Take, for instance, just one example from the November 9, 1954 Mason City Globe-Gazette in Iowa: N
Some Americans were more interested in Little Abner than they were in their own interests at stake in the election. N
Li'l Abner was a daily newspaper comic strip that ran for over 40 years. Created by Al Capp, it ran from 1934 until 1977 in newspapers throughout America. Everybody loved Li'l Abner. But back in the 1950s people were reading a comic strip rather than tracking the latest poll results, and that was supposedly destroying America. N
Idiocracy continues the great American tradition of producing media that bemoans the terrible state of America's collective intelligence. But as a piece of historical futurism (yes, it really has been nearly a decade since this movie was produced) it has a worrisome message. N
We're frustrated by the world, believing that encouraging smarter people to breed would somehow fix our problems. But it simply isn't so. It's a distraction from the institutional problems of our society. The problem isn't that stupid people (again, read: poor) are having too many children. The problem is that we aren't living up to the ideals and promises we've given to each generation of Americans that have come before us. A livable wage, paid maternity leave, proper funding of scientific research — these are the things a functional, civilized society are built upon; the ways that we can improve our world. We don't build a better society by getting more smart people to fuck each other. N
I'm not arguing that the world hasn't changed in some ways for the worse since the Before Times™ — that magic period of enlightenment that existed before you were born. Nor am I arguing that the media we consume doesn't matter. It does, insofar as it can influence the way that we see the world. N
But the great irony of a film like Idiocracy is that when we take the film to its logical conclusion, 99 percent of Americans should be sterilized. And if you spent 90 minutes watching a movie instead of studying quantum mechanics or something, that probably includes you. 11
s
The unspoken part about how the stupid breed faster than the smart is that an improved standard of living for all.
12
s
Now imagine your position if you read 1000 words about that movie, instead editing Wikipedia...
N
Update: Here's the first two minutes of the movie, if you haven't seen it: N
Adobe Flash Player or an HTML5 supported browser is required for video playback.
Get the latest Flash Player
Learn more about upgrading to an HTML5 browser

Images: Screenshots from the 2006 film Idiocracy N
122l 21051Reply
Like
Like
3.6k3.6k
Matt Novak’s Discussions
All replies
I dunno.. don't you think if more intelligent people were breeding, there'd be more livable wages, paid leaves, and proper funding for scientific research? It certainly wouldn't hurt in trying to live up to the ideals and promises you speak of...
Flagged
You(and the movie) are making the assumption that smart people have smart children and dumb people have dumb children. While I'm sure the intelligence of the parents does have an effect on a child's overall development it still is entirely possible for two idiots to produce a genus and vice versa, eugenics would not really solve the problem.
Flagged
Even if the population of intelligent people was greater it wouldn't mean that the world would be a better place. An intelligent person isn't more inclined to be altruistic. There are plenty of intelligent people who are petty and biased little turds out to get what they want at the expense of others.
Flagged
sterilization...because thats the logical conclusion? Lets just throw selflessness and moderation out. Certainly that couldn't be what the joke was about, aimed at both the "intelligent" and the "dumb."
Flagged
Really, Eugenics is where you go? Troll much?
Generally, there is a link between intelligence, birth rate, wealth, and status. Which one has the largest influence can be debated, and we have never been very good at pulling anyone of those levers to change outcomes. Notice I did not say an absolute link but there is no denying that statistically there is a link. Idiocracy was satirizing our general laziness as human beings to allow automation to take on cognitive tasks which we used to perform ourselves and that the logical conclusion was that we would no longer need that intelligence because of the world we created. The manifestation of which we see in the world today. Mike Judge was just saying maybe you should exercise your brain before it atrophies, not kill all the dumb people.
Flagged
That's funny, I thought it was obvious from the get-go that Mike Judge was mocking eugenics, an idea that has been totally discredited. Obviously, if that dystopia was possible we'd never have any advances in culture, we'd already have found ourselves in a deep well, but we see more books and education that at any time in history. Anyone who thinks eugenics is not a failed idea needs to read up on the history of the eugenics, from the roots in Darwin up to the end of WWII. Hint: the people who say they need to breed people are always interested in breeding more people like themselves, and fewer of the people they don't like. Second, go catch up on Hans Rosling's work, easily found by a web search.

So, Matt, I think your reading of it is wrong. Every generation has some cult movies that get referenced because of the frisson of dark pleasure they give. My generation and peers were into "Repo Man" but that doesn't mean we believe it is an accurate version of reality.
Flagged
I feel the same way about Planet of the Apes. This movie is terrible because, per your last paragraph, its logical conclusion, all apes should be sterilized before their Rise, Dawn and/or Conquest.

Sheesh.
Flagged
Matt Novak is a writer for a poor news source and you should be ashamed for liking him. His over analysis and misunderstanding of satire is lethargic and excessive to the point of adding nothing to the debate.
Flagged
It's been a while since I saw this movie as I didn't enjoy it on my first view, for some of the reasons mentioned here. But, I also seem to remember that a lot of it played on racial stereotypes, with black and Latino characters speaking "ghetto." I'm glad this article was written as Idiocracy deserves to be forgotten. Mike Judge may have went well (still a big fan of Beavis & Butthead, King of the Hill and Office Space), but he hit all the wrong marks in this movie.
Flagged
You have kinda missed the entire point. Is wealth = intelligence? No...however having a substantial amount of wealth DOES tend to open up better opportunities whether it's going to a better school, or living in an area with better public schools (read as: higher real estate taxes), etc etc and so on...and whether you want to acknowledge it or not, urban uneducated areas DO have a tendency to have, lets say "reproductive challenges". Remember this video?
http://www.thedailysheeple.com/women-with-15-...

Mind you I HATE referencing an obviously politically slanted article, but the truth is you hear stories like that all the time. The difference is that the wealthy CAN provide for their offspring, and DO have a tendency to be more "reproductively responsible" if you will. While the above is an extreme case, in what world should someone with no income to speak of have 15 kids? And what is the takeaway from someone who had 15 kids with 3 different people? "SOMEBODY has to pay for these kids". You can practically insert that quote into the movie Idiocracy without even changing it.
So no idiocracy isn't saying that the POOR are the problem. It's saying that the poor AND IRRESPONSIBLE are the problem. I don't know many "poor" folks who would think "hey I'm gonna jump a jetski from a lake into a swimming pool" - yet that's just the sort of thing you might expect from someone who is an idiot, lacks education, lacks logic, and lacks the sense of responsibility that good education DOES help to promote (generally, obviously exceptions).
As for saying 99% of Americans should be sterilized - again, not the point. The point is that the lady in the article linked above might only have one kid, or maybe two, and be in a position potentially to provide for them...whereas folks like the wealthy couple in the movie might actually have 3 or 4 and be able to provide for them. Having children is a responsibility and quite frankly should be a privilege, not a right. You have to have a license to drive. You have to pay for registration and insurance to drive. A kid? Shit, you don't even need medical insurance. You pay for a dozen shots of tequila and voila, you have a kid. While I'm not a fan of mandating what people can and cannot do with their bodies, at some point being able to place SOME kind of restriction might not be such a terrible idea....because all it does is further a system that will, not to the same extent but somewhat, very greatly resemble Idiocracy in some ways.
Paging Dr.Lexus....lady is in to have her 16th child that she has no money to pay for...
Flagged
Thank you for writing this article on why undereducated, underachieving individuals should outpace the intelligent, hardworking, educated, wealthy people. I now understand why these rich people should have to subsidize the living of everyone else at their expense, it's only fair. I now understand that I was merely being elitist, racist, and classist when I believed that those who work harder and work smarter to contribute to society deserve to earn more than those who only consume without contribution.
See, it's annoying when people exaggerate what you've actually said to make you look stupid or malicious, isn't it? When you exaggerate something well beyond what it actually says to make it sound more extreme, it sounds crazy! Who'd have thought? Nevermind that this movie does not at any point advocate for eugenics and is, you know, a low-budget comedy which is at most mildly asking for greater academic interest and less base consumerism.
Flagged
Oh brother! Where the HECK in that intro did it say ANYTHING about it being the Poor who were at fault?
I have known MANY wealthy people who were, how shall I put this gently? STUPID AS ROCKS.
You are reading a number of implications into the movie that simply don't exist.
Essentially, people became dumb in the story because people GOT LAZY!
And eugenics? Now THAT is simply idiotic.
Part of the problem is that our media is pandering to the lowest common denominator without regard to intellect. What we NEED is a media that stimulates our intellects and MAKE us want to learn more while providing substance for the educational needs of the public.
Flagged
I mean, I agree with you about the inherent inegalitarianism of this film, and I agree that a lot of its diagnosis is crude and ugly. But I do think there's this larger issue sort of poking around here, which is whether it's true that human beings are basically good. And I think the answer, frankly, is no, and I also think that people beat themselves up trying to will that into being and get beat up for denying it. So we find these specific causes (the world getting dumber! political polarization! religion! the death of religion!) instead of confronting the fact that the world is full of selfish people who don't care that much who they hurt.
Flagged
Hosts of other popular chats
Kinja is in read-only mode. We are working to restore service.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%