People often ask me about my background because I look somewhat racially ambiguous to the untrained eye. When I tell them I’m half Egyptian, I always get the same tired response:
“That’s so cool!”
Put yourself in my place for a minute and imagine how irritating it is to constantly have your personal identity declared “cool,” like it’s something to inquire about and be interested in. This sort of exoticism pervades American societal spaces, framing oppressive (predominantly white) groups as arbiters of cultures with which they have no firsthand experience. I refuse to simply absorb these racially-tinged microaggressions, especially coming from a tulip-sniffing wooden-shoed Dutchman like Marc Van de Mieroop.
Dr. Van de Mieroop is a Columbia history professor who “specializes” in the ancient Near East and teaches a course about Ancient Egypt. He has written dozens of articles and numerous books on the subject. He holds an master’s degree and doctorate from Yale University. He is also a Dutch white male. So frankly, he should not be speaking for the Ancient Egyptians—they can speak for themselves just fine. Columbia is supposed to be one of the most progressive academic spaces in the country. It is absurd that, in 2015, a class about one race is being taught by someone of a different race. It recalls the profound ugliness of the segregation era.
There are two types of knowledge. The first is the kind you get from a book, an experiment, an archaeological dig, peer-reviewed research, independently verified accounts, or a priori reasoning. That’s all Van de Mieroop has to draw from when he talks about Egypt. But that doesn’t even touch the value and integrity of the knowledge we gain from living our lives and occupying intersectional identificational spaces. What more objective account of the world can there possibly be than the one constructed from your (my, in this case) personal experience? Of course, personal experiences are not all equal, particularly those clouded by Dutch privilege.
When Dr. Van de Mieroop arrogantly proclaims in his book, A History of Ancient Egypt, that “The idea of detaching tomb from mortuary complex probably predated Hatshepsut,” one wonders where he got the authority to comment on Egyptian burial spaces without so much as a single Egyptian blood relative. When he pronounces, “The royal court resided at Itj-tawi for perhaps more than a century in the 13th dynasty and the country remained unified,” it is baffling that he presumes to grasp what unification truly means to an Egyptian. I was certainly never consulted, nor were any of my aunts and cousins in Egypt, whom I have visited over four times.
At the very most, Dr. Van de Mieroop can be a white ally in the search for new ceramic shards and mummified corpses. But—and this is important—he should leave the work itself to Egyptians. For many, unearthing a canopic jar or translating a series of hieroglyphs is an intensely personal experience that allies will simply never understand. Any attempt to understand it constitutes a hugely problematic form of voyeuristic racism. Why put my ancestors under a microscope of oppression when there are plenty of white people things for Van de Mieroop to excavate? Perhaps he can grab a spade, go to a trailer park, and dig up a copy of Here Comes Honey Boo Boo on DVD.
If Dr. Van de Mieroop’s intentions are truly good, he needs to take a moment to adjust his actions accordingly. Because his pedagogical appropriation of my history has so viscerally offended me (and by extension every Egyptian), it is therefore offensive and an apology would be a good first step toward closing my wounds. Secondly, “Ancient History of Egypt” (the harmful course in question) should be suspended indefinitely until the history department can find someone Egyptian enough to teach it. Thirdly, the C- I received in the course two years ago should be permanently expunged from my academic record in recognition of the pain I have endured.
Then, and only then, can the healing begin.
This piece is intended as satirical.
Ziyad Abdelfattah is a Columbia College senior majoring in political science and music. He is a former poet laureate of the CUMB. Ziyad’s Cry for Attention runs alternate Fridays.
To respond to this op-ed, or to submit an op-ed, contact opinion@columbiaspectator.com.
Comments
Brilliant satire of leftists. Cultural appropriation of ancient Egyptian culture is indeed a huge issue. Thank you for leveraging your intersectionality!
Brilliant! You had me fooled through most of the article. Great way to start my day.
Ziyad writes, "He is also a Dutch white male. So frankly, he should not be speaking for the Ancient Egyptians..."
++
Ziyad, the Muslim jihadists took care of the Ancient Egyptians. They wiped them out and/or forcibly converted then to the relatively un-ancient Muslim nation today known as Egypt.
++
And, of course, we all know how modern Egypt (Islamic Egypt) is now ethnically cleansing Egypt of its few remaining ancient people (the Copts who have been there many centuries longer than any Muslims).
This op-ed is what is wrong with this school.
satire (?) in comments in confusing
Van de mieroop is Flemish, not Dutch. What the hell, ziyad
Yeah this lack of specificity constitutes a micro-aggression.
How many of us thought this piece was serious, until reading the note at the bottom saying it's satirical?
It's a statement about Columbia that this is the kind of thing that actually would fit into the discourse at our school.
"tulip-sniffing wooden-shoed Dutchman"
...you thought this was serious?
At first I thought the piece was basically serious, with a couple phrases (like that about tulip-sniffing) just sort of an odd attempt at humor.
If you thought this was at all serious, then you don't understand the basic principles of cultural appropriation and why this isn't very particularly sharp satire.
i was already setting up my cannons LOL. I certainly was fooled :-D
My new favorite column.
TRIGGERING INTENSIFIES
It is a melancholy object, the op-ed that masks an unconstructive (unfunny?) diatribe as satire. I think it is agreed by all parties that this piece demonstrates a deplorable lack of understanding, or at least willingness to acknowledge, the complexity of the ongoing dialogue about cultural appropriation on campus.
But my intention is far confining this dialogue to serious, formal, or analytical pieces of writing. Humor and satire deserve a place. There is nothing funny, though, about misconstruing painfully articulated points into an angry rant against 'those-dumb-people-who-keep-getting-offended-at-everything.' There are valid critiques to be made.This is not one of them. This op-ed is the equivalent of screaming at your TV - when's the last that's accomplished anything?
And with that, I bid you adieu, and return to feasting on the flesh of orphans.
Not to undermine your opinion of course, but just to make sure, you do realize that your statement,
"There is nothing funny, though, about misconstruing painfully articulated points into an angry rant against..." is JUST and ONLY- YOUR opinion..right?
because I personally find it fucking hilarious lol
See. My name beta-male.
A work of art
honestly? this is brilliant satire. stop defending "those people who get offended at everything" - literally three quarters of the school is already on their side, they have very little to complain about in terms of student response, and they absolutely don't need defending
how much are you willing to bet that some students began to read this and fervently agreed - until they saw at the bottom that it was satire? lol @ columbia
Yo you better step back off my boy homie before it gets supernatural up in here
This is calumny! I'll have you know that some of my best friends are Ancient Egyptians.
Brilliant satire
I feel like the accusation that a person "a poor grasp" of concepts such as appropriation, intersectionality, etc. is often used in place of an actual response. And I'd like to hear more specifics – and not another cop-out response like "you'd have to take a CSER or gender studies class to understand." I'd just like to see an outline of the logic underlying your reaction to this particular article.
I'm willing to assume there are legitimate objections, but the fact that responses to these things are often extremely vague is making me -- and a lot of other people -- increasingly skeptical.
this joke is on the many underrepresented students of color at CU who struggle for platforms to voice the disrespect we face on a daily basis, not on uncritical white liberals. I agree with accepting a privileged body convey information on bodies of color, but this article reads as "check your underprivilege"
That makes sense but I think this article is more targeted toward the extreme end of the spectrum rather than people whose identity enriches their otherwise substantive arguments
I believe this column created a safe space for the many underrepresented students of color at CU who struggle for platforms to voice the disrespect we face on a daily basis. Do you disagree?
Ziyad, is it okay to call white people trailer trash because you put it behind the label of satire?
Yes.
I concur. Play on Ziyad.
Do you guys think that if I gave Professor Van de Mieroop a little vial that he might give me some of his tears? The cold weather is making my hair dry out.
This is the funniest thing I've ever read in Spec. Ziyad, keep up the good work.
Ladies and gentlemen, let us not allow spec to distract us with funny satirical articles in order to blind us from the true enemy of the free world
THE FALSE RAPE ACCUSERS WHOM INHABIT THIS CAMPUS
LET US NOT FORGET WHOM THE TRUE ENEMY TO JUSTICE AND FREEDOM IS
LET US NOT FORGET THE CAMPAIGN OF PUBLIC BULLYING AND VICTIMIZATION
LET US NOT FORGET THE INNOCENT ACCUSED WHO WERE BULLIED INTO SILENCE
Let us not forget.
Before I saw the small satire disclaimer, I honestly believed this was a serious opinion piece by a Columbia student, based on my previous experiences reading the Spectator. It is good to know this school is not 100% radical leftists, only 99%.
Holy shit is the best thing I've ever read in Spec. Never thought I'd say this but props Spec for putting those progressives in their place and more content like this and you may have another reader hooked.
ثكلتك أمك يا زياد