Comparative Literature, Cultural Studies, New Media and otherwise critical-theory/Frankfurt-School focused departments have their share of "bad feminists." It mostly comes, I think, from being thrown into course material that requires historical grounding and a lot of work to rigorously understand; most of these departments aren't structured so as to have prerequisites and a gradual build-up of knowledge (like a STEM field would). That isn't a bad thing in itself, but you just get people taking the authors at their word and not yet having the critical skills to evaluate the work and understand its limitations. Though I think, by the time they graduate, most of these students do have these skills.

Also, you have to realize that a lot of the shit you see are actually jokes, e.g. "God sometimes I just want to exterminate all the men on the earth." We all can understand that they are joking, much like someone might say, "Bitches be crazy." The contradiction often comes when they claim (due to the oppression-driven model of acceptable violence) that they can make a joke as an oppressed or unprivileged class, but that the flipside is totally unacceptable, disgusting, violent, triggering, et cetera.

edit: More on the 'lack of prerequisites':

You also have to realize that, after postmodern theory took off, there was a strong push to eliminate the whole philosophical tradition from the curriculum. Theories of 'cultural capital' understand, through the postmodern lens, that there is no essential canon of Western thought. From this comes the elimination of continental philosophy from cultural studies departments. The only problem is that all of the famous theorists have a background in continental philosophy. Karen Barad? Yup. Judith Butler? Yup. Bell Hooks? You better fucking believe it. The reason it is helpful is because these are really nuanced issues which have been discussed, more or less, for thousands of years. Yet these students are often being taught without the history that might help them situate the current rad-fem arguments in a greater discourse.

My biggest pet peeve is when I am told to "go read <insert Feminist scholar here>" when I disagree with someone, as though if I disagree with anything someone says I clearly just haven't read any contemporary Feminist theory. Of course I have! That's being a good philosopher! You're supposed to read everything! The problem is that these students aren't being taught to be thinkers, but radicals or activists. This puts the focus of their study on the evangelization of a particular ideology instead of the evaluation of ideologies in general. smh