The only thing you can see from my username is that Misogyny1337 was taken. That is irrelevant.

The problem you're having (with your argument) is that you actually have to show that that is the case. Breast cancer almost unequivocally affect women (it's very rare in men), but breast cancer research is arguably one of the most well funded medical research on the planet. Certainly the most well funded cancer research. Show me how that makes sense in your paradigm and I might take you seriously.

I don't for a second buy that the problems women face are not taken seriously. In fact, I have only seen evidence of the contrary. I expressed that already, in terms of male suicide.

The only thing that this discussion has suggested so far, is that some problems are taken seriously more than others, and gender does not correlate.

EDIT: As another poster pointed out, women live 7 years longer than men. Explain that in your paradigm. This is NOT biological. Men are far more likely to die prematurely. Women are far more likely to die of that rare cause of death (nowadays) of old age. The gap has historically been anywhere from virtually non-existent to much less (less than 7 years). It's only in times of war when it has been higher (because, regardless of what Clinton believes, men actually are the victims of war).

I appreciate that you care about women's rights, but you can't make statements like that when they are unfounded.