This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more hereHide
AdChoices
AdChoices
Advertisement
The Guardian home
 
powered by
Custom Search
Sort by:
Relevance
Relevance
Date
Web
 
 
 
.

We wouldn’t accept actors blacking up, so why applaud ‘cripping up’?

Eddie Redmayne, who won a Golden Globe for playing Stephen Hawking, is the latest in a long line of non-disabled actors to portray disabled characters
Eddie Redmayne as Stephen Hawking in The Theory of Everything
Eddie Redmayne as Stephen Hawking in The Theory of Everything. Photograph: Liam Daniel/AP
“If you do a film about the Holocaust, you’re guaranteed an Oscar,” goes the famous Kate Winslet joke in Extras. The same can be said for an actor doing a film about disability. Unless you’re a disabled actor, that is. Then you’re lucky to even get the part.
This week, when Eddie Redmayne won a Golden Globe for his portrayal of Stephen Hawking in The Theory of Everything, he became the latest in a long line of non-disabled actors to portray disabled characters. And to walk away – literally – with an award for doing so. From Daniel Day Lewis in My Left Foot to Dustin Hoffman in Rain Man, the ability to play “disability” is a definite asset for an actor, a source of genuine acclaim.
But is this as harmless as mainstream audiences seem to see it? While “blacking up” is rightly now greeted with outrage, “cripping up” is still greeted with awards. Is there actually much difference between the two? In both cases, actors use prosthetics or props to alter their appearance in order to look like someone from a minority group. In both cases they often manipulate their voice or body to mimic them. They take a job from an actor who genuinely has that characteristic, and, in doing so, perpetuate that group’s under-representation in the industry. They do it for the entertainment of crowds who, by and large, are part of the majority group.
Daniel Radcliffe, centre, with Sarah Greene and Pat Shortt in The Cripple Of Inishmaan
Daniel Radcliffe, centre, with Sarah Greene and Pat Shortt in The Cripple Of Inishmaan at the Cort Theatre in New York. Photograph: Andrew Toth/Getty Images
The explanations for “cripping up” are obvious. The entertainment industry is a business, after all, and stars sell. When Daniel Radcliffe played a disabled orphan in The Cripple of Inishmaan this won more headlines for the production than if a disabled, lesser-known actor had been cast. On a practical level too, perhaps hiring a non-disabled actor is easier. The ability to walk allows Redmayne to portray Hawking before being diagnosed with motor neurone disease. But I can’t get away from the fact that, if these arguments were made for white actors “playing black”, our outrage would be so great that the scenes would be left on the cutting room floor.
There’s a theory of why non-disabled actors playing disabled characters leads to success: audiences find it reassuring. Christopher Shinn, a playwright who had a below-the-knee amputation, describes the act of watching a disabled character being played by an actor who we know is really fit and well as allowing society’s “fear and loathing around disability” to be “magically transcended”.
When it comes down to it, Shinn says, “pop culture is more interested in disability as a metaphor than in disability as something that happens to real people”.
Daniel Day Lewis in My Left Foot
Daniel Day Lewis in My Left Foot. Photograph: ITV/Rex Features
After all, disabled characters create powerful images and sentiments for audiences. They can symbolise the triumph of the human spirit over so-called “adversity”. They can represent what it is to be “different” in some way, an outsider or an underdog who ultimately becomes inspirational. These are universal feelings every audience member can identify with. And there is something a little comforting in knowing, as we watch the star jump around the red carpet, that none of it – the pain or negativity we still associate with disability – was real.
Perhaps that’s part of the problem. Perhaps as a society we see disability as a painful external extra rather than a proud, integral part of a person, and so it doesn’t seem quite as insulting to have non-disabled actors don prosthetics or get up from a wheelchair when the director yells “cut”. But for many disabled people in the audience, this is watching another person fake their identity. When it comes to race, we believe it is wrong for the story of someone from a minority to be depicted by a member of the dominant group for mass entertainment. But we don’t grant disabled people the same right to self-representation.
Perhaps it is time to think before we next applaud “cripping up”. Disabled people’s lives are more than something for non-disabled actors to play at.
Comment is free
close

Get the best of Comment is free

The most shared comment, analysis and editorial articles delivered every weekday lunchtime.
Sign up for the Comment is free email
SECURITY WARNING: Please treat the URL above as you would your password and do not share it with anyone. See the Facebook Help Center for more information.
SECURITY WARNING: Please treat the URL above as you would your password and do not share it with anyone. See the Facebook Help Center for more information.
x

Find us on Facebook

.
The Guardian
Like
Like
You like this.
.
You and 4,162,478 others like The Guardian.4,162,478 people like The Guardian.
  • Rogelio Morales Ü
  • Duha Okour
  • Maria Efimova
  • Jelena Vesić
  • Rodgers Paul Rpee
  • Ahmed Modher
  • Abdallah Bebo
  • Kevin Shah
  • Yuan Whitburn
  • Katson Wilson
  • Jawahar Babu K
  • Zahid Khan
  • Bejie Prolo
  • Kunle Sode
  • Garry Osvaldo
  • Zsófi Hámori
  • Naemah Olad
  • Ahmed Abu Al Rub
  • မင္းမင္း စိုး
  • Marcy Vernon
  • Bhumika Jariwala
  • Shahfaisal Meer
Sign up for the Guardian today - UK edition
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.
(Emails are sent every morning)
These comments have been chosen by Guardian staff because they contribute to the debate.
  • No comments have been picked yet.
Sorted
  • Guardian staff
    MikeSelvey
    A lot of people are missing the point here, which is not just that disabled people should play disabled parts but that there is no reason why an actor with a disability should not play parts habitually given to able-bodied actors. We just make assumptions that a part demands an able bodied actor.
    I have a son with cerebral palsy. He is hemiplegic but so robust is he you might not notice it were you to see him. Although still at school he is a talented actor who has played some demanding parts and has ambition to be an actor. But he is very conscious of the discrimination he could face. It is not like 'blacking up' and Eddie Redmayne is a red herring here because of course Hawking is portrayed as able-bodied at first. But attitudes really do need changing.
Open for comments. Sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion.
Showing conversations, threads , sorted

Today's best video

Soulmates

The Guardian's
online dating site
Meet someone worth meeting

On Comment is free

Guardian Bookshop

This week's bestsellers

  1. 1.  Late Fragments
    by Kate Gross £11.99
  2. 2.  Guest Cat
    by Takashi Hiraide £6.39
  3. 3.  Exposures
    by Jane Bown £7.50
  4. 4.  British Library crime classics collection
    £20.00
  5. 5.  Germany
    by Neil MacGregor £22.00
Search the Guardian bookshop

Latest posts

Sponsored feature

  • © 2015 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.

Send to a friend

Close this popup
Your IP address will be logged

Contact us

Close this popup
Close
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%