use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
詳しくは検索FAQを参照
高度な検索: 投稿者や、subredditで……
2,038 現在のここのユーザー
related subreddits
View all of the above subreddits at once.
IRC: #TrollChromosomes on snoonet.org
I'm sorry (imgur.com)
runaway_goatdone did the dirty が 7 時間 前 投稿
残りのコメントをみる →
[–]sugar_bottom 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント 2 時間 前 (15子コメント)
But squirting isn't. I'm a squirter, and I hate the widespread ignorance about it. Most women are capable of doing it (women who lack Skenes' glands are an extreme minority). I've never met a squirter who didn't think it wasn't a learned skill.
And yes, squirt does come out at that speed and volume. You basically need rubber sheets.
[–]heatherhaks 21 ポイント22 ポイント23 ポイント 1 時間 前* (13子コメント)
Skenes glands can't produce a high volume of fluid quickly enough to make you need rubber sheets. If it comes out in high volumes, there's a very good chance you're urinating.
Edit: For the Skene glands to be able to release a high volume of fluid in a short enough time, and since they don't have a storage bladder of their own with a big enough volume, there's really only two options. Either a significant portion of the 'ejaculate' is urine, or the glands are somehow quite rapidly drawing plasma from blood, and at those volumes, I'm just not believing it's that, based on known anatomy science.
Tl;dr: You can't produce something from nothing, the fluid has to come from somewhere, and the only source of that much liquid is urine.
[–]sugar_bottom 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント 1 時間 前 (10子コメント)
I've explained this in other posts on this thread. It is unknown where the Skenes' glands pull the fluid they generate, but yes, they do indeed produce that much fluid. They may pull from the bladder, but that is not the same as urinating. Any squirter or squirter's sexual partner will tell you: it is NOT pee. It smells, tastes, and feels different. Just because it comes from the urethra does not make it pee, or else you'd be calling semen pee.
We actually know very little about how female ejaculation works and unfortunately it is very difficult to get funding for scientific studies of sex.
TL;DR ITT: vanillas who haven't drank pee and squirt to compare them.
[–]slipshod_alibi 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 時間 前 (1子コメント)
Perfect tldr
[–]sugar_bottom 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 1 時間 前 (0子コメント)
Freaking right??
I've had this conversation before. I've offered to send video proof.
They never take me up on it...
[+]heatherhaks スコアが基準値未満のコメント-18 ポイント-17 ポイント-16 ポイント 1 時間 前* (7子コメント)
Do not presume to know anything about my sexual experience, you judgmental bitch.
As for the 'research' on this topic, official, peer reviewed studies really haven't been done. Most information on this topic comes from anecdotal evidence, which is not accurate in itself. I've done extensive research into this topic, reading many articles in different journals, and a lot of sources are from people outside of a urological background, such as psychiatrists. Female sexual anatomy is one of the biggest areas of anatomy that's still a mystery.
Before you judge people, perhaps you should, you know, try to back up your statements with actual thought.
Edit: Just to be clear, I'm offended at being called a vanilla. You don't know anything of my sexual history or what kinks I'm into.
[–]mcketten 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 1 時間 前 (6子コメント)
Funny, I didn't see any judgement in what she said but a lot in what you said. And I didn't see her flipping out and engaging in personal attacks, but you certainly did.
[–]heatherhaks -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント 1 時間 前 (5子コメント)
Really? She sure called me a vanilla to dismiss my comment.
[–]mcketten 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 58 分 前 (4子コメント)
If you equate a suggestion that people who don't know the difference between ejaculate and urine are vanillas to calling someone a judgmental bitch, then you really need to get off your high horse and calm the fuck down.
Probably should get off the internet, too. I assure you, someone will say something that is far more offensive and actually is a personal attack - and based on your initial reaction, you are not capable of handling that.
[+]heatherhaks スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント 53 分 前 (3子コメント)
I admit that I gave an escalated response, but you are behaving as though she did nothing. She did judge me. She presumed to know my sexual preferences, history, and knowledge.
[–]mcketten -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント 35 分 前 (2子コメント)
The first presumption was yours - that urine was the only source for the ejaculate.
That presumption said a lot about your knowledge and history, whether accurate or not. It suggested you hadn't done much more research into female ejaculation than reading what others say on reddit. It also suggested, quite pointedly, that you had never experienced it.
She responded with personal information and contradictory points to yours - if her assumption about you was wrong, it was due primarily to the way you initially presented yourself and your knowledge. Your reaction to then get aggressive with her is one most commonly done by someone who knows they have been caught in a lie or caught pretending to know more than they do, and they don't have the balls to admit it.
Your continued effort to shift blame to her over one word is also symptomatic of those same responses.
[–]astareal 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 30 分 前 (0子コメント)
I think Heather and Sugar are both correct, based on personal experience and a background in biology.
[–]heatherhaks -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント 29 分 前 (0子コメント)
Go back and read my comments. If you think I didn't do my own research, you have poor reading comprehension.
[–]YouDunDeedItNah -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 3 分 前 (1子コメント)
Wrong
[–]heatherhaks 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント たった今 (0子コメント)
How? Refute my points.
[–]soundbunny 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 39 分 前 (0子コメント)
Science seems to be defining squirting as mostly urine, but female ejaculation as non-urine. There's nothing inherently wrong with urine being involved in a sex act, but to think that it isn't doesn't really jive with anatomical reality. Perhaps the phrasing is a problem here. However, squirting as it's depicted in porn is often simply urine or a special effect. Porn is not real, and many of the acts it depicts are enhanced for viewer response. Porn is to real sex what the WWE is to a real bar fight.
We care about your privacy, and we never spam. By creating an account, you agree to reddit's User Agreement and Privacy Policy. We're proud of them, and you should read them.
π Rendered by PID 2593 on app-24 at 2015-01-11 00:12:43.190865+00:00 running a41a651 country code: JP.
残りのコメントをみる →
[–]sugar_bottom 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント (15子コメント)
[–]heatherhaks 21 ポイント22 ポイント23 ポイント (13子コメント)
[–]sugar_bottom 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント (10子コメント)
[–]slipshod_alibi 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]sugar_bottom 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]heatherhaks スコアが基準値未満のコメント-18 ポイント-17 ポイント-16 ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]mcketten 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]heatherhaks -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]mcketten 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (4子コメント)
[+]heatherhaks スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]mcketten -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]astareal 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]heatherhaks -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]YouDunDeedItNah -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]heatherhaks 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]soundbunny 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)