(cache) Dentistry Students Suspended For Joking About Rape, But Some Users Aren't Feeling the Laughing Gas : SubredditDrama


Personal information is grounds for site-wide ban	directly from administrators, so be warned. Any user found "doxxing" will be banned without warning from SRD and will be reported to the admins.
Zero tolerance policy on slurs or hate speech	directed at anyone in comment or post form. Users found trolling for the sake of trolling will be banned on sight.
Personal attacks will be removed at the discretion of moderators	to maintain a reasonable level of discourse. For a good idea of the kind of stuff we mean by "personal attacks" look here Editing out the personal attack will allow your comment to be reinstated. If you disagree with a removal feel free to modmail us.
Do not vote or comment in threads you've found through SRD	This is a bannable offense
Novelty accounts are not welcome in /r/SubredditDrama
Meta threads must be pre-approved via modmail before being posted


Any submissions must use the No Participation domain.	Replace the "http://www.reddit.com/r/example/..." URL with "http://np.reddit.com/r/example/..." See this post for instructions. The only exceptions to this rule are when you link to /r/TumblrInAction, /r/againstmensrights, /r/AdviceAnimals, and /r/ImGoingToHellForThis. Details about exceptions can be found here
Do not use [brackets] in your titles	The only exception is for mod-approved [Meta] posts, [Classic] posts, and [Recap] Posts. Everything else will be removed.
Avoid bias	Only post links if you are not the source of drama or directly involved in the drama. Remain as neutral as possible; biased titles/self posts are grounds for deletion.
We are not your personal army.	No calls-to-arms shall be allowed.
When submitting drama do not link to the full comments	Instead link directly to the comment tree containing the drama. If the comment you're linking to requires some context, add "?context=x" to the URL, where "x" is the number of parent comments you want displayed. If there are multiple drama threads create a self-post containing the relevant links. Linking to full comments is only allowed under special circumstances, and when allowed it must be submitted as a self post. Any link to full comments must be to a submission that ideally has less than 100 comments.
Your account must be 14 days or older to submit	You can wait for your account to age, or submit with your main.
Try to come up with a descriptive and interesting title	and make sure there's drama!


Reports	If you see a user breaking the rules, please click the "report" button. If it isn't obvious what rule is being broken, send us a modmail with an explanation and a link to the offending comment or submission.
Warnings	Users who break rules will recieve a warning via PM or a distinguished comment. You may be warned for rule offenses instead of banned, but certain offenses are ban-on-sight, and all bans are up to the mod's discretion.

[–]thenewperson1Functional High Ground 45 ポイント46 ポイント47 ポイント 4 日前 (36子コメント)

固定リンク

[–]Mr_TulipI need a beer. 14 ポイント15 ポイント16 ポイント 3 日前 (5子コメント)

[–]thenewperson1Functional High Ground 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 3 日前* (4子コメント)

[–]HogtownHoedown 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント 3 日前 (3子コメント)

[–]Mikeavelli 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 3 日前 (1子コメント)

[–]blasto_blastocyst 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]Riverrun_past_eve 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]CantaloupeCamperOFFICIAL SRS liaison, next meetup is 9pm at the Hilton 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント 3 日前 (1子コメント)

[+]vizuals スコアが基準値未満のコメント-14 ポイント-13 ポイント-12 ポイント 3 日前 (27子コメント)

In my experience the people that don't like this approach tend to respond more emotionally. "That shouldn't have happened... That's wrong... They should be punished..."

Those that take the other approach tend to think more analytically and in terms of what precedence that may set.

Personally, I'm in the latter group but there's obviously no right or wrong way as to how you approach these issues.

IMO, this sets a bad precedence. Yes, talking about raping someone is "wrong" but is it punishable? Especially when this is on Facebook--not a university sponsored club or event.

I would argue that whatever we as individuals write on social media should be off limits to any university, employer or any other institution.

And then there's the guilt by association. This is troubling too. Yes, if you're a good kid and hang out with bad kids, you'll be treated like bad kids. True. But does that make it right? Consequences there are a phone call to your parents? Consequences here are orders of magnitude more severe. Suspending everyone in the group seems to be like a pretty rash response and for all intents and purposes, that is a punishment.

If I were to take the other more emotional approach, fuck them. They should have thought about what groups they join and what they wrote. Further, I wouldn't want my daughters next to them in class nor my sons.

But should justice be served by parents of the "victims"?

[–]PortlandoCalrissianCultured Marxist 30 ポイント31 ポイント32 ポイント 3 日前 (12子コメント)

[+]vizuals スコアが基準値未満のコメント-11 ポイント-10 ポイント-9 ポイント 3 日前* (11子コメント)

There are a number of issues here and I'm on my phone so I can't point out all of them.

Even though I said social media should be off limits, and I stand by that comment, I more broadly believe that anything non-work or non-school related should be off limits. The medium doesn't really matter.

Would you lose your job? I don't know. Certainly if you passed that note around onsite. Offsite, it becomes less clear IMO. Again, my mind likes to think of the generality and not any specific instance. Did you sign something that said your off work hour activities could affect your employment?

Also, if we're saying social media is admissible in these situations (and they are in this case though I think it shouldn't be), then the person who wrote those comments should be punished.

But your analogy would be more accurate if you did not write those notes but someone in your department did. Perhaps you knew about it. Perhaps not. Doesn't matter because your boss suspended you all until he got to the bottom of it. Oh, and your names were released to the public in local and national papers. This is what is troubling, I think.

Edit: I thought I had read that the names were released. Not sure now. Again, on my phone.

[–]PortlandoCalrissianCultured Marxist 17 ポイント18 ポイント19 ポイント 3 日前 (1子コメント)

[–]vizuals 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]beanfiddlersparkle motion recruiter 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント 3 日前 (8子コメント)

[+]vizuals スコアが基準値未満のコメント-11 ポイント-10 ポイント-9 ポイント 3 日前 (7子コメント)

Normally, I don't reply to these posts because they are more emotionally charged rather than rationally thought. (I'm not saying your post was irrational.)

In this case, I ultimately agree with you in that they all should be suspended (at least you imply that). But I agree for different reasons. My understanding is that their Facebook group included the school's name. That's kind of like writing an offensive joke at work on company letterhead.

As for the joke itself, it doesn't bother me really. Joke about anything as much as you want, just don't do anything violent, morally reprehensible, illegal, etc.

edit: in my mind, making a racist joke doesn't make you a racist. Making a rape joke, doesn't make you a rapist. Making a homophobic joke doesn't make you homophobic. At most, it makes you insensitive IMO.

[–]beanfiddlersparkle motion recruiter 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]rampantdissonance 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 2 日前 (5子コメント)

It's interesting, but it seems that quite often, someone claiming to be "logical" and their opponent to be "emotional" is often shorthand for "I am not affected by this and don't think it's a big deal." Try and consider a few different scenarios in which you could be involved, and see if that changes your perspective.

Imagine you're in a dentist chair about to go under anesthesia, and the dentist goes into the other room and is talking with an assistant. You overhear him say to the assistant that he's going to rape you and that you'll wake up with a sore asshole. Would you go through with it?
You're the head of a family practice of dentistry. You're about to hire a new guy, but then you find out about some comments he made about raping passed out women. If anything like that happens, people find out that you knew about it, your practice will be in serious trouble. Do you hire the guy?

[–]vizuals 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 2 日前* (4子コメント)

[–]rampantdissonance 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 2 日前 (3子コメント)

[–]vizuals 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 2 日前 (2子コメント)

このスレッドの続きを見る

[–]braveliltoaster11 35 ポイント36 ポイント37 ポイント 3 日前 (11子コメント)

[–][deleted] 26 ポイント27 ポイント28 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

Jesus christ, no kidding. You're in an industry where professionalism and ethics are more than buzzwords, they're half your fucking job. I don't want some guy operating on me whose thought out loud the various ways he could take advantage of and violate women, in a profession where he can and does put women under in unconciousness.

Especially since dentists and doctors have been caught doing exactly that, numerous times. You combine vulnerable state with a likely target with "jokes" like that, you deserve to have your ass chewed out. This would be like a group of cops "joking" about shooting young black kids on their precinct private Facebook page.

But hey, guys don't have to worry about shit like this, so naturally it's totally harmless to them. I'm just glad most of the people defending these assholes aren't in positions of care like that.

[–]the-Tao 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[+]no_dice スコアが基準値未満のコメント-9 ポイント-8 ポイント-7 ポイント 3 日前 (4子コメント)

[–]braveliltoaster11 24 ポイント25 ポイント26 ポイント 3 日前 (3子コメント)

[+]no_dice スコアが基準値未満のコメント-15 ポイント-14 ポイント-13 ポイント 3 日前 (1子コメント)

I don't think you understand how many women are raped and how real and unfortunately realistic that fear is.

I understand that completely. I never said the jokes that these students made were in good taste.

It is not okay to joke about

According to whom, exactly? I can name you several very successful comics right now who have some pretty misogynistic stuff in their acts.

just because you're a tough guy doesn't mean others should have to be afraid that their dentist might really mean it when they joke about raping women when the are put under.

Could you please list the exact jokes for me to see? What jokes were posted there that specifically involved rape?

It also has nothing to do with me being a "tough guy" and everything to do with not really caring what someone does in their personal life as long as they're professional when they're working.

[–]SqueakyLaughter 18 ポイント19 ポイント20 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/dalhousie-university-probes-misogynistic-student-gentlemen-s-club-1.2873918

CBC News obtained screenshots of the group's posts, which are sexually explicit and appear to involve discussions of female classmates. In one post, members were polled and asked, "Who would you hate f--k?" They were given two names to vote on. Another post shows a woman wearing a bikini. The caption says, "Bang until stress is relieved or unconscious (girl)." ... Their conversations also include jokes about using chloroform on women. The words: "Does this rag smell like chloroform to you??" were superimposed on one photo. In response to another photo of a bikini-clad woman, two members wrote: "Can you tell me what this chloroform smells like?" and "Does this mask smell like nitrous oxide to you?"

Doesn't sound like I'd want any of them to be my dentist.

[+]JF425 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[+]vizuals スコアが基準値未満のコメント-11 ポイント-10 ポイント-9 ポイント 3 日前 (3子コメント)

[–]shakypears 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 3 日前 (2子コメント)

[+]vizuals スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント 3 日前 (1子コメント)

[–]shakypears 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]thenewperson1Functional High Ground 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 3 日前* (0子コメント)

In my experience the people that don't like this approach tend to respond more emotionally. "That shouldn't have happened... That's wrong... They should be punished..."

And then go on to give reasons why they feel that way.

Those that take the other approach tend to think more analytically and in terms of what precedence that may set.

By taking things to surprising extremes and generally bringing up unnecessary straw-men. Quite like the OP of the linked thread.

I'm hesitant to believe that is somehow more analytical. In fact, both approaches strike me as emotional, because (as you later wrote yourself), this isn't a topic with a right or wrong approach.

IMO, this sets a bad precedence.

What is it? Because this case only adds to the growing number of cases where schools and workplaces take action against the people that represent them. Nothing new as far as I can tell.

Yes, talking about raping someone is "wrong" but is it punishable? Especially when this is on Facebook--not a university sponsored club or event.

Yes, given the context. Especially when the group name had the school's name in it. Whether or not the group was sponsored by the school, it made reference to the school and that definitely means they represent the school. It would be very hard for the school to deny those people weren't a part of the school's student body.

I would argue that whatever we as individuals write on social media should be off limits to any university, employer or any other institution.

I would argue the same in cases where you do not represent those institutions or there is no lawful reason for this. Unfortunately for these guys, comments made while in a group directly referencing your school and making jokes about using chloroform on a person are good reasons to have your social network contents reviewed.

And then there's the guilt by association. This is troubling too.

This isn't a set precedent though...

Yes, if you're a good kid and hang out with bad kids, you'll be treated like bad kids. True. But does that make it right?

Pretty much, yeah. Who's supposed to be the good kid in this scenario?

Consequences there are a phone call to your parents? Consequences here are orders of magnitude more severe.

Consequences where? And more severe than what, calling parents? Is the typical response to this supposed to be a call to their parents? Is that what you mean? If so, I heavily disagree. The punishment is quite appropriate in this scenario.

Suspending everyone in the group seems to be like a pretty rash response and for all intents and purposes, that is a punishment.

I don't think anyone harbours the delusion that the university's actions weren't punishment. I would categorise the students' actions as rash here, not the university's.

If I were to take the other more emotional approach, fuck them. They should have thought about what groups they join and what they wrote. Further, I wouldn't want my daughters next to them in class nor my sons.

This isn't any more emotional than all what you wrote before really. If anything it's just not so great out of context (which applies to a lot of things anyway). What makes it more emotional to you?

But should justice be served by parents of the "victims"?

Who are the victims (and why the quotes)? The boys? The girls mentioned? If you mean the girls, justice wasn't served by their parents but by the school. If you mean the boys, what justice could be served by their parents?

Edit: Saw your reply to /u/PortlandoCalrissian. Apparently you had incomplete details?

[–]xXxDeAThANgEL99xXxThis is why they don't let people set their own flairs. 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

In my experience the people that don't like this approach tend to respond more emotionally. "That shouldn't have happened... That's wrong... They should be punished..."

Those that take the other approach tend to think more analytically and in terms of what precedence that may set.

Also known as invoking the slippery slope fallacy to justify not acting on an actual real-life wrong-doing that happened.

A curious point is that one could easily slippery-slope the other way, "what if they actually planned rape", "what if they exchanged revenge porn" etc, but somehow the group that you label as illogical knows better than to do that.

Yes, talking about raping someone is "wrong" but is it punishable?

It's not about punishment, it's about people's right to not hang out with assholes. If you say vile shit you shouldn't be surprised that people don't want to have you around.

I would argue that whatever we as individuals write on social media should be off limits to any university, employer or any other institution.

The university channels the will of the individuals here. As a matter of fact, being a for-profit organization, it doesn't have a choice not to honor the wishes of the individuals attending it currently or in the future, because otherwise they wouldn't.

So is your speech actually directed at those very individuals, like, guys, you don't have the right not to be around assholes, don't try and strong-arm the university into expelling them? Why? Why do you think that you don't have the right to choose a university where your daughters and sons wouldn't sit in the same class as such assholes? Dude, you do, use it, and you would make the world a better place.

[–]HogtownHoedown 64 ポイント65 ポイント66 ポイント 4 日前 (30子コメント)

Prospective medical professionals are all told to clean up their fucking act when they start. For example, here is Brown College's instructions on social media:

Social networking. The medical school strongly advises students to exercise caution when using social networking tools such as Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr, You Tube, and blogs. These tools, while useful for interaction around social causes or political movements, can also create professional and ethical dilemmas regarding relationships with patients, patient confidentiality and patient trust in care providers. Additionally, they contribute to a blurring of the line between professional contexts, in which you represent Brown and the medical profession generally, and other more personal interactions. AMS students must be cognizant of the “social contract” between physicians and the public that holds medical professionals to high standards of behavior.

Specifically, students are prohibited from sharing personal expressions, in the form of text, photos, images or video, that:

Violate patient confidentiality;
Violate the doctor-patient relationship;
Depict illegal activities.

Students are strongly discouraged from sharing personal expressions in the form of text, photos, images or video that could impair a student’s ability to form a therapeutic relationship with patients or to have a professional relationship with medical colleagues and supervisors. In short, the administration of AMS expects students, like physicians, to maintain a high level of professionalism in their non-medical public life.

固定リンク

[–]thesilvertongueDon't insult pandas 15 ポイント16 ポイント17 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]emmsterIf you don't have anything nice to say, come sit next to me. 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[+]Lesmothianmade entirely of straw スコアが基準値未満のコメント-7 ポイント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント 3 日前 (27子コメント)

[–]out_stealing_horseson_my_hiphopapotomus 52 ポイント53 ポイント54 ポイント 3 日前 (3子コメント)

[–]Lesmothianmade entirely of straw 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[+]eleventwentyfourteen スコアが基準値未満のコメント-13 ポイント-12 ポイント-11 ポイント 3 日前* (1子コメント)

[–]out_stealing_horseson_my_hiphopapotomus 19 ポイント20 ポイント21 ポイント 3 日前* (0子コメント)

[–]the-Tao 41 ポイント42 ポイント43 ポイント 3 日前 (12子コメント)

[+]Lesmothianmade entirely of straw スコアが基準値未満のコメント-13 ポイント-12 ポイント-11 ポイント 3 日前 (7子コメント)

[–]chanilastname 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント 3 日前* (0子コメント)

[–]the-Tao 27 ポイント28 ポイント29 ポイント 3 日前 (5子コメント)

[+]vizuals スコアが基準値未満のコメント-7 ポイント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント 3 日前 (4子コメント)

[–]the-Tao 18 ポイント19 ポイント20 ポイント 3 日前 (3子コメント)

[–]wcspaz 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 3 日前 (1子コメント)

[–]ControlRushᕙ( ͡o ͜ʖ ͡o)つ━☆ﾟ.*･｡ﾟ ☼B⃦☼ this is good for ethics in bitcoin 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]vizuals -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[+]eleventwentyfourteen スコアが基準値未満のコメント-15 ポイント-14 ポイント-13 ポイント 3 日前* (3子コメント)

[–]DocileBanalBovinePop POP 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 3 日前 (2子コメント)

[–]eleventwentyfourteen -4 ポイント-3 ポイント-2 ポイント 3 日前 (1子コメント)

[–]DocileBanalBovinePop POP 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]Mr_TulipI need a beer. 24 ポイント25 ポイント26 ポイント 3 日前 (8子コメント)

[+]Lesmothianmade entirely of straw スコアが基準値未満のコメント-13 ポイント-12 ポイント-11 ポイント 3 日前 (7子コメント)

[–]jrussell424 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]Mr_TulipI need a beer. 26 ポイント27 ポイント28 ポイント 3 日前 (5子コメント)

[+]no_dice スコアが基準値未満のコメント-12 ポイント-11 ポイント-10 ポイント 3 日前 (4子コメント)

[–]PortlandoCalrissianCultured Marxist 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 3 日前 (3子コメント)

[–]no_dice -3 ポイント-2 ポイント-1 ポイント 3 日前 (2子コメント)

[–]DocileBanalBovinePop POP 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 3 日前 (1子コメント)

[–]no_dice 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]PalpzPro fascist mod policies 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]phreaklegionMayor of the Defecative Room 18 ポイント19 ポイント20 ポイント 4 日前 (1子コメント)

固定リンク

[–]richardmarxist -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]Xentago 24 ポイント25 ポイント26 ポイント 4 日前 (7子コメント)

固定リンク

[+]Maslo59 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-14 ポイント-13 ポイント-12 ポイント 3 日前 (6子コメント)

[–]Xentago 16 ポイント17 ポイント18 ポイント 3 日前 (5子コメント)

[+]Maslo59 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-10 ポイント-9 ポイント-8 ポイント 3 日前 (4子コメント)

[–]Xentago 13 ポイント14 ポイント15 ポイント 3 日前 (3子コメント)

I dont know about that. AFAIK it was just a group for the male students of the class, hence the name Class of 2015 DDS Gentlemen. Was there some stated horrible purpose?

Purposes don't need to be stated to be obvious. Captures from the group show pretty clearly what it's about. "Innocent" groups do not have "which of our classmates do you want to hatefuck" polls. This is much the same way as the average person is able to tell that "The Democratic People's Republic of China" is none of those things.

Are the students going to run away or attack the dean?

No, which is why they aren't actually detained, I was using a comparison or analogy. In this case the risk is the effect of their presence on the other students and to the public in their careers if they're not up to the standards of professionalism and ethics as demanded by their governing body, so they're taken out of class.

[–]Tree_Boarcops are evil incarnate 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 2 日前 (0子コメント)

[+]Maslo59 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-7 ポイント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント 3 日前 (1子コメント)

Captures from the group show pretty clearly what it's about.

Captures from inside the group are irrelevant for evaluating morality of people's subscribtion to the group. Do you know how Facebook groups work? Much like Twitter - its possible to be subscribed to some group without ever seeing any content from it (particularly if you have a lot in your feed and the group does not have a lot of activity and you dont sit on FB all day - I am probably subscribed to hundreds of pages by now and see only a fraction of them). Unless the name or description of the group indicates it, you cannot claim that a subscriber knew what was going inside.

In this case the risk is the effect of their presence on the other students and to the public in their careers if they're not up to the standards of professionalism and ethics as demanded by their governing body, so they're taken out of class.

As I have said, I would understand if only those making the comments were suspended, but suspending all subscribers is over the top.

[–]Xentago 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

Much like Twitter - its possible to be subscribed to some group without ever seeing any content from it

Captures from the group showed that, for example, 8 of the 13 members voted in the "hatefuck poll" and all 13 members saw it.

Unless the name or description of the group indicates it, you cannot claim that a subscriber knew what was going inside.

Yeah, but the suspicion is reasonable given the size of the group, the close ties it has to their location (it's not some random interest group), hence the investigation and the suspension while it's ongoing. This is not a "beyond reasonable doubt" standard because it's not a penalty yet, in the same way that the police can arrest you before you've been found guilty. It is absolutely reasonable that each member of the group is under suspicion and that the school has responded accordingly.

As I have said, I would understand if only those making the comments were suspended, but suspending all subscribers is over the top.

If this was an enormous group with hundreds or thousands of subscribers, this might indeed be impractical. But given the close and personal nature of the group, this is perfectly fitting.

[–]alexthelateowlFree Hugs <3 Tumblr > Reddit 20 ポイント21 ポイント22 ポイント 4 日前 (11子コメント)

固定リンク

[–]poffin 32 ポイント33 ポイント34 ポイント 3 日前 (2子コメント)

[–]fuckthepolisthink pepsi 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

I used to work in a dental school and based on my experience with soon to be dentists, it is pretty clear that dental students are fucking stupid. Dental students in their third or fourth year and in their residencies are even dumber than first year students though I'm not sure why that is.

First year dental students all try to cheat on the same test in the same class at the same time using last year's answers that they've shared with everybody and miss all the questions because an additional question was added at the start and fail the class en masse.

Third year dental students don't understand that the implant study they are basing a paper on wouldn't have three or four years worth of healing data on dental implants when the study's first implants went in 6 months ago.

Once they get to be real dentists they seem to snap out of it as far as I can tell.

The handwriting never recovers though.

[–]thesilvertongueDon't insult pandas 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]toiracseGhost in the Machine 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 4 日前 (7子コメント)

[–]alexthelateowlFree Hugs <3 Tumblr > Reddit 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[+]no_dice スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント 4 日前 (5子コメント)

[+]saint2e スコアが基準値未満のコメント-12 ポイント-11 ポイント-10 ポイント 4 日前 (4子コメント)

[–]Mr_TulipI need a beer. 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント 3 日前 (3子コメント)

[–]saint2e 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 3 日前 (2子コメント)

[–]Mr_TulipI need a beer. 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 3 日前 (1子コメント)

[–]saint2e 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]BartletForPresidentYou're a fucking bowl of soup! 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

固定リンク

[–]Michelanvalo 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 4 日前 (18子コメント)

固定リンク

[–]strugleArl of Shredcliff 23 ポイント24 ポイント25 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]HogtownHoedown 37 ポイント38 ポイント39 ポイント 4 日前 (15子コメント)

[–]thesilvertongueDon't insult pandas 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[+]Michelanvalo スコアが基準値未満のコメント-12 ポイント-11 ポイント-10 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[+]Dimdamm スコアが基準値未満のコメント-16 ポイント-15 ポイント-14 ポイント 3 日前 (9子コメント)

[–]experimentinfinity 34 ポイント35 ポイント36 ポイント 3 日前 (7子コメント)

[+]Maslo59 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-16 ポイント-15 ポイント-14 ポイント 3 日前 (6子コメント)

[–]xfcanadian 20 ポイント21 ポイント22 ポイント 3 日前 (5子コメント)

[+]Maslo59 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-17 ポイント-16 ポイント-15 ポイント 3 日前 (4子コメント)

[–]Saai_Ghoti 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 3 日前 (3子コメント)

[–]Maslo59 -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 3 日前 (2子コメント)

[–]Saai_Ghoti 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 3 日前 (1子コメント)

このスレッドの続きを見る

[–]PalpzPro fascist mod policies 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[+]srdidan スコアが基準値未満のコメント-17 ポイント-16 ポイント-15 ポイント 3 日前 (2子コメント)

[–]HogtownHoedown 25 ポイント26 ポイント27 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]theFournier 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]cdstephens 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]Kingoftheneckbeards 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

固定リンク

[–]ttumblrbots 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 4 日前 (0子コメント)

固定リンク

[–]JF425 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

固定リンク

[–][削除されました] 4 日前 (5子コメント)

[deleted]

[–]IsADragon -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 4 日前 (0子コメント)

固定リンク

[+]no_dice スコアが基準値未満のコメント-10 ポイント-9 ポイント-8 ポイント 4 日前 (3子コメント)

固定リンク

[–]Goatf00t 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント 3 日前 (2子コメント)

[–]theFournier 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[–]Akodo -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

[+]Manakel93 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-14 ポイント-13 ポイント-12 ポイント 4 日前 (2子コメント)

固定リンク

[–]confusedblues 21 ポイント22 ポイント23 ポイント 4 日前 (1子コメント)

[–]Manakel93 -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 3 日前 (0子コメント)

SubredditDrama

Live Chat #subredditdrama on irc.snoonet.org port 6667, or click here to join from webchat

Rules/Guidelines:

About the Moderation Here

Useful links

調停者

ユーザインターフェイス用言語	(*) 未完成翻訳ボランティアに立候補する

SubredditDrama

Live Chat #subredditdrama on irc.snoonet.org port 6667, or click here to join from webchat

Rules/Guidelines:

About the Moderation Here

Useful links

調停者

you'll need to sign in or create an account to do that

新しいアカウントを作る

sign in