reddit is a platform for internet communities

where your votes shape what the world is talking about.

更に知る ›
並べ替え:
新着
注目新着トップ論争中

The Koch Brothers Fund Religious Groups That Are Eliminating Women’s Rights による alllieにおいて socialism

[–]shroom_throwaway9722 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not sure what point you're trying to make.

No one is arguing that the Kochs are unintelligent or uneducated.

The Koch Brothers Fund Religious Groups That Are Eliminating Women’s Rights による alllieにおいて socialism

[–]shroom_throwaway9722 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

They used their connections and got into good universities and got degrees in Chemical Engineering?

Are you saying the Kochs got rich because they worked for their money? LMAO

Reddit's White Supremacist "Squatzis" Launch an Online War Against Murdered Black Men による AltThinkにおいて socialism

[–]shroom_throwaway9722 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

An AnCap and a racist? Quelle surprise!

Lenin bringing the smack-down on people who call themselves "egalitarian" instead of feminist による t8nlinkにおいて socialism

[–]shroom_throwaway9722 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Fuck off, MRA scum!

Your kind has no place here.

Lenin bringing the smack-down on people who call themselves "egalitarian" instead of feminist による t8nlinkにおいて socialism

[–]shroom_throwaway9722 -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Socialism and feminism are inseparable.

Lenin bringing the smack-down on people who call themselves "egalitarian" instead of feminist による t8nlinkにおいて socialism

[–]shroom_throwaway9722 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not only can we focus on multiple issues, but we must.

Yes, duh.

But you're ignoring the fact that people who tend to aggressively push the whole "egalitarianism" angle are doing it specifically to attack feminism.

Going into a discussion about feminism and saying "but what about the men!?" is not okay.

Going into a discussion about anti-racism and saying "but what about the white people!?" is not okay.

Going into a discussion of gay rghts and saying "but what about the straight people!?" is not okay.

 

This sort of derailment tactic has been documented at length. You need to stop.

FAQ: What’s wrong with saying that things happen to men, too?

But What About the Menz?!

Lenin bringing the smack-down on people who call themselves "egalitarian" instead of feminist による t8nlinkにおいて socialism

[–]shroom_throwaway9722 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

His MRA beliefs came from the internet.

So? How does that make it any less real?

The MRA movement (yes, it is a movement) has an actual visible impact on society.

it's a group of people who gather online to share their hate.

Guess what? Practically everyone uses the internet. Your argument is nonsensical.

The Koch Brothers Fund Religious Groups That Are Eliminating Women’s Rights による alllieにおいて socialism

[–]shroom_throwaway9722 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

They contribute to museums around the country, they run a massive Prostate Cancer foundation which is a very underfunded disease, they give lots of money to schools and lots more.

You ignore how they got that money and power in the first place.

It's like praising a mugger for being kind and charitable because they gave you a dollar after taking your entire wallet.

They have a political ideology that is WRONG, but that's all it is, a political ideology.

What they do actually hurts people.

Lenin bringing the smack-down on people who call themselves "egalitarian" instead of feminist による t8nlinkにおいて socialism

[–]shroom_throwaway9722 -3 ポイント-2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is what you sound like.

Lenin bringing the smack-down on people who call themselves "egalitarian" instead of feminist による t8nlinkにおいて socialism

[–]shroom_throwaway9722 -3 ポイント-2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

yet you're complaining about a "movement" that's limited to a few thousand libertarians on reddit and a couple college clubs

If you think MRAs only exist on the internet, you have a lot to learn.

Lenin bringing the smack-down on people who call themselves "egalitarian" instead of feminist による t8nlinkにおいて socialism

[–]shroom_throwaway9722 -4 ポイント-3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Oh, so now they are oppressed? Or not?

Men are affected by it, but pretending they are oppressed like women are is absolutely ridiculous.

There's a reason it's called patriarchy and not something else.

feminism and egalitarianism

The popular liberal narrative of "egalitarianism" ignores the relationship between the oppressors and the oppressed. But, of course, you're someone who thinks white people experience racist oppression so I don't expect you to understand these concepts.

Lenin bringing the smack-down on people who call themselves "egalitarian" instead of feminist による t8nlinkにおいて socialism

[–]shroom_throwaway9722 -4 ポイント-3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It is already well understood that feminists fight for a just and equitable society.

I'm not going to play into the MRA narrative of "egalitarianism" being a separate concept from other struggles against oppression.

Lenin bringing the smack-down on people who call themselves "egalitarian" instead of feminist による t8nlinkにおいて socialism

[–]shroom_throwaway9722 -4 ポイント-3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Crowing "but what about the men!?!" in a discussion of feminism shows you to be an ignorant buffoon.

Go away.

Behold the Power of Capitalism! による WineRedPsyにおいて socialism

[–]shroom_throwaway9722 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The problem is a socialist state cannot attract talent the same way a Capitalist society can.

Oh for sure man. It's not like the Soviet Union was the global leader in space exploration, physics, chemistry, etc...

lol

Lenin bringing the smack-down on people who call themselves "egalitarian" instead of feminist による t8nlinkにおいて socialism

[–]shroom_throwaway9722 -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Do you go into emergency rooms with a papercut and complain that you are not treated with the same priority as a gunshot victim?

Behold the Power of Capitalism! による WineRedPsyにおいて socialism

[–]shroom_throwaway9722 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

How does exploitation and profit, which makes capitalists rich, lower the price of commodities?

And why do socialists have to compete with capitalists on the basis of profit (something that does not exist within socialism)?

If anything, the socialist mode of production is far more efficient because it is free of the the parasitic effects of capitalism. Production happens to satisfy needs, instead of satisfying the capitalist's desire for profit.

This article on how the USSR traded with capitalist countries may give you some insight.

Lenin bringing the smack-down on people who call themselves "egalitarian" instead of feminist による t8nlinkにおいて socialism

[–]shroom_throwaway9722 -6 ポイント-5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Go back to /r/MensRights, shitbag.

Behold the Power of Capitalism! による WineRedPsyにおいて socialism

[–]shroom_throwaway9722 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

In socialism there are no profits, because there is no exploitation of the working class, because there is no capitalism.

Why would socialists need to compete with capitalist businesses anyway?

Lenin bringing the smack-down on people who call themselves "egalitarian" instead of feminist による t8nlinkにおいて socialism

[–]shroom_throwaway9722 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Oh, I definitely understand your posts. That's not the problem here.

Lenin bringing the smack-down on people who call themselves "egalitarian" instead of feminist による t8nlinkにおいて socialism

[–]shroom_throwaway9722 -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Gay rights activists don't tell heterosexual people that their problems don't exist

Heterosexual people are definitely not oppressed on the basis of sexual orientation.

So from a gay rights perspective, heterosexual people do not have problems. This is just a statement of fact.

and that they need to stop being revolutionary.

What are you talking about?

Feminists say a concurrent egalitarianism movement should stop existing

What is the "egalitarianism movement" anyway?

I have never seen an 'egalitarianist' who wasn't just using that word as a cover to be a reactionary anti-feminist. I see this sort of argument mainly from MRAs.

But then still wants Feminism to only address female problems.

Women are oppressed on the basis of gender. Men are not!

And feminists do address men's problems, from the perspective that toxic hetero-patriarchy harms men to some extent too. But it harms women to a far greater extent, so that's what feminists focus on the most.

Behold the Power of Capitalism! による WineRedPsyにおいて socialism

[–]shroom_throwaway9722 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Profit is required to remain competitive internationally.

Competitive in what aspect, exactly? And with whom?

What do you think of the modern feminist movement? による JonnyOfCitiumにおいて socialism

[–]shroom_throwaway9722 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

But I assume you mean the tumblrists, in which case, whatever, they're kind of annoying but they don't effect my life.

What the fuck are "tumblrists"?

Lenin bringing the smack-down on people who call themselves "egalitarian" instead of feminist による t8nlinkにおいて socialism

[–]shroom_throwaway9722 -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't understand why Feminists insist that Feminism is Egalitarianism, and then in the same breath claim that it's okay for Feminism to only address women's issues.

Why don't gay rights activists focus on heterosexual people's issues?

Why don't trans rights activists focus on cis people's issues?

Why don't anti-racism activists focus on white people's issues?

Why don't disability rights activists focus on able-bodied people's issues?

Maybe you ought to take a few moments and think about the questions you're asking.

"But it's an emergency!" による beesyrupにおいて raisedbynarcissists

[–]shroom_throwaway9722 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

how would poor people get to hospital if they were seriously injured?

They often don't:

"But it's an emergency!" による beesyrupにおいて raisedbynarcissists

[–]shroom_throwaway9722 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Welcome to the USA.

続きを見る 次 ›