use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
詳しくは検索FAQを参照
高度な検索: 投稿者や、subredditで……
288 現在のここのユーザー
Links of interest to childfree individuals. "Childfree" refers to those who do not have, and do not ever want, children (whether biological or adopted).
SUBREDDIT RULES: READ RULES BEFORE POSTING!
Join us on the r/childfree IRC Channel. Choose a nickname and hit connect!
The FAQ
Database of childfree-friendly doctors
Looking to meet up with other childfree folks for friendship (or maybe more!)? Check out r/cf4cf!
Kill me (i.imgur.com)
SignalAmp が 16 時間 前 投稿
残りのコメントをみる →
[–]Trexmaster 18 ポイント19 ポイント20 ポイント 15 時間 前 (26子コメント)
I understand that the algorithm for any country to avoid young/old generations disparity is, at least, three kids per couple.
However, where do these people find their time, resources and money for so many kids?
[–]MalbecApologist 17 ポイント18 ポイント19 ポイント 15 時間 前 (24子コメント)
Well, the money comes from the government, natch.
[–]AaabbbcccdddeeI hate all children. 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 15 時間 前 (23子コメント)
No, it comes from us, stolen by the government at gun point to give to them.
[–]GadFly81 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 13 時間 前 (19子コメント)
I've vented over that many times to my GF.. I am taxed like crazy for schools I won't be needing, while all these mormons with 4+ kids are getting crazy tax credits and assistance to negate any taxes they paid in the first place. So in essence the people with no kids are paying for the schools while the people with kids aren't paying much of anything.
[–]beanspude 59 ポイント60 ポイント61 ポイント 12 時間 前 (15子コメント)
I'd rather pay to have these children educated. It's worth it.
[–]DantePD 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 8 時間 前 (1子コメント)
If it weren't for the fact that people who pop out this many tend to be religious home schoolers, it would be worth it.
[–]itsme__ 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 34 分 前 (0子コメント)
That is why we have to make sure we have good schools. So the children of religious fanatics (who are lucky enough to not be home schooled) actually get an education.
[–]Brawny661 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 10 時間 前 (2子コメント)
Further sweeping the real costs of raising a child under the rug and either incentivizing or at least greatly reducing the disincentives of having children.
[–]Iazo29\M/ 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント 9 時間 前 (1子コメント)
Hey. You know what the prime indicator for woman fertility is? Lack of education. The less erucated, the more kids that woman will have.
I swear AnCaps are so ridiculously shortsighted.
[–]dudefriendguybro 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 8 時間 前 (0子コメント)
If only we could insure that public schools are giving comprehensive and accurate sex ed. It realllllly varies by region.
[+]BornOnFeb2nd30s/M/Snip. スコアが基準値未満のコメント-7 ポイント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント 12 時間 前 (6子コメント)
See, theres the difference.
If you own a home, you're being forced, at gunpoint, to support an institution that you have absolutely no control over, or say in the matter, except to "vote" whether it gets more money or not. Hope your opinion is in the majority though!
If I could direct my taxes to the school of my choice within, say, 10 miles or something, I'd be reasonably okay with that.
However, just because I live in a certain area, I have to pay X to Y?
That's a protection racket.
[–]patssleHouston. Cars + Travel > Kids 21 ポイント22 ポイント23 ポイント 11 時間 前 (2子コメント)
No. Because then the poor schools would suffer even more.
[+]BornOnFeb2nd30s/M/Snip. スコアが基準値未満のコメント-11 ポイント-10 ポイント-9 ポイント 11 時間 前 (1子コメント)
Yes, and?
If they can't manage the economies of scale to make staying operational a feasible endeavor, then that school should probably be shut down and merged with another.
Hell, that's what happened to my old Middle School... they demolished it, and the students that would have gone there were bussed to a different school that apparently had some capacity.
If the intended host school doesn't have capacity, then entice philanthropists to donate by explaining the value inherent in your proposition, how it'll work, how much you'll need, etc. Work to add a wing to the school, or an entirely new school/building.
No matter how noble the end result may appear, redistribution of wealth is still robbery through violence.
[–]krysatheo 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント 10 時間 前 (0子コメント)
While you do have a point that some schools need to learn to spend their money more wisely, having underfunded schools leads to poverty and crime, and generally holds back society.
[–]noarchy -3 ポイント-2 ポイント-1 ポイント 11 時間 前 (2子コメント)
I think you're completely right, but pushing hard libertarianism (or full-blown anarcho-capitalism) may not sell well here.
[–]BornOnFeb2nd30s/M/Snip. -4 ポイント-3 ポイント-2 ポイント 11 時間 前 (1子コメント)
Yup, I fall in the AnCap spectrum.
While I think the NAP is a pipe-dream, getting people to recognize the gun(s) in the room is a step in the right direction.
[–]noarchy -4 ポイント-3 ポイント-2 ポイント 11 時間 前 (0子コメント)
I got a hint of Molyneux there.
Whether the NAP is a pipe dream or not is another matter. But we're really going to derail this discussion if we go there!
[–]vanillamoose -4 ポイント-3 ポイント-2 ポイント 11 時間 前 (1子コメント)
I think there should be an option to opt out. If you want to support fuck trophies, go ahead but don't believe that everyone should have to. Other peoples children should not be something I have to be paying for.
[–]itsme__ 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 27 分 前 (0子コメント)
Well sadly you were born into a society, not a band of roaming bandits.
[–]JustTryingToMaintain -3 ポイント-2 ポイント-1 ポイント 1 時間 前 (0子コメント)
It'd be worth it if the public schools childfree people are paying for were actual places of learning. Sadly, that is not the case.
[–]kawaiigardinerGay/Male/NZ 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 11 時間 前 (0子コメント)
For me I've always been ok with paying taxes (income tax since those are paid centrally in New Zealand and city councils are there for the bare basics of libraries, pools, roads, sewage etc) to fund health, education, social welfare, roads, rail etc. but if, as a parent, after receiving all those services you require more money to top up your income then IMHO you've been irresponsible to have more children than you can afford. Living in a society involves the collective meeting half way and the individual meeting at that half way point - if we have people getting to the point that they pretty much pay for next to none of their lifestyle choices I really have to ask whether it is a partnership or the enslavement by society at large by those whose narcissism allows them to justify them living a lifestyle at someone else's expense.
[–]Njoerun 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 12 時間 前 (1子コメント)
Depending on where in the world you live those kids may very well be paying your pension later.
[–]vanillamoose 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 11 時間 前 (0子コメント)
With as difficult as it is to get a job today I imagine it will be much more difficult in the future. No matter how good a school may be, it isn't going to fix the way some people raise their kids, and the ones I'm talking about are going to be entitled assholes who will never be able to hold a stable job.
[–]Watchful1ntervention31/M/Vasectomy = "Lifehack" -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント 14 時間 前 (1子コメント)
Work harder, millions on welfare are depending on you.
[–]BoringUsername42 23 ポイント24 ポイント25 ポイント 13 時間 前 (0子コメント)
When did childfree become /r/libertarian?
[–]vi_warshawski 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 7 時間 前 (0子コメント)
well nowadays it is harder than in previous generations. people in the current generation are finding it harder to find the kind of work that can support three kids.
We care about your privacy, and we never spam. By creating an account, you agree to reddit's User Agreement and Privacy Policy. We're proud of them, and you should read them.
π Rendered by PID 4788 on app-224 at 2015-01-01 15:07:47.946240+00:00 running ed7ac98 country code: JP.
残りのコメントをみる →
[–]Trexmaster 18 ポイント19 ポイント20 ポイント (26子コメント)
[–]MalbecApologist 17 ポイント18 ポイント19 ポイント (24子コメント)
[–]AaabbbcccdddeeI hate all children. 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (23子コメント)
[–]GadFly81 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (19子コメント)
[–]beanspude 59 ポイント60 ポイント61 ポイント (15子コメント)
[–]DantePD 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]itsme__ 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Brawny661 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Iazo29\M/ 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]dudefriendguybro 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]BornOnFeb2nd30s/M/Snip. スコアが基準値未満のコメント-7 ポイント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]patssleHouston. Cars + Travel > Kids 21 ポイント22 ポイント23 ポイント (2子コメント)
[+]BornOnFeb2nd30s/M/Snip. スコアが基準値未満のコメント-11 ポイント-10 ポイント-9 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]krysatheo 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]noarchy -3 ポイント-2 ポイント-1 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]BornOnFeb2nd30s/M/Snip. -4 ポイント-3 ポイント-2 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]noarchy -4 ポイント-3 ポイント-2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]vanillamoose -4 ポイント-3 ポイント-2 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]itsme__ 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]JustTryingToMaintain -3 ポイント-2 ポイント-1 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]kawaiigardinerGay/Male/NZ 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Njoerun 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]vanillamoose 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Watchful1ntervention31/M/Vasectomy = "Lifehack" -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]BoringUsername42 23 ポイント24 ポイント25 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]vi_warshawski 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)