72
73

Dog licks drunk girl (youtube.com)

sm0kie420 が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
ベスト
トップ
新着
注目
論争中
古い順
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]thematt924 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (12子コメント)

Their mouths are actually a hell of a lot cleaner than ours (in terms of bacteria).

[–]Meltadc 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (8子コメント)

I've heard this argument before but they lick the front and back. To me that loses.

[–]thematt924 -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (7子コメント)

It's not an "argument" it's a fact, but yeah I see you're point and it's hard to disagree with you there.

[–]I_CAN_SMELL_U -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (6子コメント)

Its not a fact lol.

[–]thematt924 -3 ポイント-2 ポイント  (5子コメント)

I assure you, a dog's mouth is in fact cleaner than a human's insofar as a clean mouth means one that is less likely to spread disease.

Harmful dog germs are usually harmless for humans, unless we’re talking about rabies, a disease that affects dogs and people in equally damaging ways. But generally, humans are immune to most dog germs.

Likewise, human germs probably won’t harm a dog. But human germs can harm humans, of course. So a bite from a human mouth full of harmful bacteria may very well be more damaging than a dog bite, even if the dog’s mouth is full of harmful dog germs.

I would site sources, but literally just type "human mouth vs dog bite" or anything remotely like that into google and tons of results will agree with it (to varying degree's, depending on your definition of a "clean" mouth)

[–]Grantly88 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I literally just googled what you suggested and the first 3 results suggested the exact opposite of what you claim. Are you retarded?

[–]thematt924 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

to varying degree's, depending on your definition of a "clean" mouth

They all agree that a dog's mouth has less bacteria than a human, particularly bacteria which would be harmful to humans. No I am not, but using "retarded" as a put down is a great way to make yourself seem immature.

[–]I_CAN_SMELL_U -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (2子コメント)

A dog that just licked itself a few minutes ago is not gonna have a cleaner mouth than me. It makes studies about this subject redundant because of how routine we can be of when we eat or drink compared to the randomness of when a dog is gonna eat its own shit or clean itself.

[–]Rixxer 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I get that it kinda goes against intuition, but that doesn't make it wrong... You are seriously dismissing facts found by scientific studies based on nothing but your own internal thinking. What the hell would ever make you think you know better?

[–]thematt924 -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You don't seem to understand, perhaps you never will.

[–]heracleides 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

They eat shit, lick their balls and asshole and dig around the yard. She was drinking alcohol all night. I think you're wrong.

[–]thematt924 -3 ポイント-2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I assure you, a dog's mouth is in fact cleaner than a human's insofar as a clean mouth means one that is less likely to spread disease.

Harmful dog germs are usually harmless for humans, unless we’re talking about rabies, a disease that affects dogs and people in equally damaging ways. But generally, humans are immune to most dog germs.

Likewise, human germs probably won’t harm a dog. But human germs can harm humans, of course. So a bite from a human mouth full of harmful bacteria may very well be more damaging than a dog bite, even if the dog’s mouth is full of harmful dog germs.

I would site sources, but literally just type "human mouth vs dog bite" or anything remotely like that into google and tons of results will agree with it (to varying degree's, depending on your definition of a "clean" mouth)

[–]R88SHUN 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

No they aren't. That is a common misconception.

The reality is that dogs have more powerful anti-bacterial enzymes in their saliva -- but they only have that because their mouths are fucking filthy.