あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]heatheranne 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (30子コメント)

What have you used to get Automod to do that?

[–]BipolarBear0[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (29子コメント)

It's just a very large user greylist, totes_meta_bot must've been accidentally caught in there when the mod who added it compiled the userlist.

[–]natched -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (28子コメント)

Great. So now in addition to the list of websites automatically censored from /r/news that you won't reveal, there also is a list of users who are automatically censored who you probably won't reveal.

Are you willing to make this "greylist" public?

[–]BipolarBear0[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (27子コメント)

It's a list of users who post in racist subs that are auto-reported in /r/trashy, a subreddit well known for being brigaded by racist subs. It's not the end of the world, my friend - everything will be okay.

[–]natched 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (26子コメント)

Then why not let people know who is on it?

Why not let people know which websites are allowed in /r/news?

[–]BipolarBear0[S] 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (21子コメント)

  1. Because then they'll create new accounts to evade the auto-reports. Logic.

  2. Probably because I haven't been a mod of /r/news for, like, three months. Where have you been?

  3. You're actually spending your Tuesday night getting upset on the internet that a whole bunch of racist fuckheads from /r/CoonTown and /r/Chimpire have their comments and posts reported automatically... In a subreddit dedicated to amusing images of trashy people. You've got a hell of a life.

[–]Ninjasantaclause 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Why won't you reveal that the real people you're blacklisting are the ones who dare speak against your evil,oppressive regime?

[–]natched 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (19子コメント)

Probably because I haven't been a mod of /r/news[1] for, like, three months. Where have you been?

I've been banned because I ask questions like this.

You're actually spending your Monday night getting upset on the internet that a whole bunch of racist fuckheads from /r/CoonTown[2] and /r/Chimpire[3] have their comments and posts reported automatically

No, because I don't know who is on the list. If it really is a bunch of "racist fuckheads" then I might not mind, but I can't look at the list to tell whether that is true.

All I have is your assertion that these are bad people, and given your history I feel no reason to believe you. I'm generally distrustful when people in authority draw up secret lists of undesirables.

[–]BipolarBear0[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (18子コメント)

You were banned because, very similarly to today, you spent your Tuesday nights relentlessly PMing the mods with incessant and unimportant bullshit that you could've answered yourself if you had applied the tiniest bit of effort into thinking about it. And what's with this Nazi Germany buzzword stuff? People in authority? Secret lists of undesirables? We're mods of a subreddit about trashy people, not the fucking Reich ministers of the Gestapo.

[–]KrabbHD 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (6子コメント)

But it's Wednesday...

[–]Ninjasantaclause 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

....In what timezone?

[–]BipolarBear0[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I've been off the past three days, messes with my internal clock.

[–]natched 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (9子コメント)

incessant and unimportant bullshit that you could've answered yourself if you had applied the tiniest bit of effort into thinking about it

I asked what websites are banned - how exactly am I supposed to find that out on my own? And even if I come up with a list based on experiment, people will deny it's true because there is no official statement.

I also asked why Media Matters is banned (as far as I can tell), while press releases from their right-wing equivalent, the Media Research Center, were allowed? What "tiniest bit of effort" can I expend to figure that out?

And if I'm not supposed to message the mods, why did you tell everyone this?

See a post that violates the rules below? Had your post stuck in the spam filter? Have a question about policy? Just want to give feedback? Send the mod team a message.

If I was spamming the mods, then I could see that being an offense. But I wasn't sending tons of messages without replies, it was a back and forth conversation. If the mods wanted to stop talking to me then they could've just stopped messaging me back.

"people in authority" is not a "Nazi Germany buzzword". Some people have more power than others. Mods have more power to control a subreddit than ordinary users, that means they are the authority there.

The person who brought up the Nazi allegations is you.

And I don't care about your tiny little sub; what I care about is finding out there is a system for mods to automatically censor individuals they don't like. If you are doing it, then other people probably are as well, including larger subreddits.

I think the people of Reddit should know about these things, which are for some reason absent from the rules listed in the sidebar.

[–]BipolarBear0[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (8子コメント)

You're not fooling anyone, I was there when you were banned. You sent upwards of five messages a day - separate modmail threads, mind you - oftentimes asking the same questions which had been answered previously. A moderator would explain something to you, you'd disagree with the explanation despite the inherent difficulty of disagreeing with fact, and then the very next day you'd send another modmail moaning about how your question was never actually answered. One day someone got tired of it and banned you. That someone wasn't me, mind you, but I knew it was a bad idea because it never really did stop your ridiculous modmail messages.

One of these days you'll wake up and realize that the things you say and do don't really mesh well with this concept we in the normal world like to call 'logic and sanity.' I'm not sure if you haven't realized this yet because you're still a child, or because you just haven't grown up, but trust me when I tell you there are more pressing social issues to spend your time on than whether the mods of a trashy pictures imageboard are secretly not allowing white supremacists to post to their subreddit.

[–]BlackFerretC -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes, everyone in Nazi Germany spoke English.

[–]psdtwk 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

It's a list of users who post in racist subs

Then why not let people know who is on it?

If you want to know which users are on the list, go to the racist subreddits and write down which users comment and submit there. You now have a copy of the users that post in racist subs.

[–]natched 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Yes, that would give me a list of users that post in racist subs, but it wouldn't necessarily give me the list of people they have on their "mod-must-approve" list.

What if someone snuck a name on the list who isn't a racist poster, maybe just someone they dislike? Where exactly would be a check for that? How would anyone find out, if they weren't a mod or the person in question?

[–]psdtwk 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

There is no check. You have to trust the mods to do what they're saying. That's how reddit works.

[–]natched -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

But that's not how it has to work. Automoderator settings can be made public, which would create transparency in these matters with almost no effort required on the moderators part.

The only thing stopping this is the fact that the mods want things to not be transparent. Things are this way because that is their choice.