2763
2764

fishFucking shark. (i.imgur.com)

Fishtails が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
ベスト
トップ
新着
注目
論争中
古い順
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]broncoz33 157 ポイント158 ポイント  (17子コメント)

Question. If I take this opportunity to punch that thing in the face is it more likely to leave me alone or be incited and enraged at me?

[–]suckitphil 46 ポイント47 ポイント  (16子コメント)

It's a great white by the looks of it. That thing doesn't care what a human does. It can cut you in half with one bite. You might injure it a bit, but I doubt anything serious to equate a response from it. These things only really experience one emotion and that's hunger.

Interestingly enough what it's doing in the picture is tasting the raft. Great whites get a lot of their information by biting things. Generally they only go after much larger and fattier prey like whales. So a lot of time they will severely injure a human by biting them, and then swim off because we don't have enough fatty tissue to be worthwhile essentially.

[–]myztry 24 ポイント25 ポイント  (15子コメント)

That thing doesn't care what a human does.

It may not care but with each of it's eyes popped by the end of a spear, it's going to have a harder time figuring out which way you went.

[–]suckitphil 53 ポイント54 ポイント  (14子コメント)

Well I suppose brutally destroying one of it's main organs would probably constitute a response.

[–]lordlicorice -8 ポイント-7 ポイント  (13子コメント)

I think you don't know what the word constitute means.

[–]Saganomics 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (12子コメント)

I think you don't know what the word constitute means.

[–]NRageTheBeast 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think you don't know what the word word means.

[–]lordlicorice -5 ポイント-4 ポイント  (10子コメント)

Oh of the love of god. If something "constitutes a response" then that thing is itself part of the response. Is brutally destroying the shark's eye a part of the shark's response?

His sentence should have read:

Well I suppose brutally destroying one of it's main organs would probably incite a response.

or:

Well I suppose brutally destroying one of it's main organs would probably necessitate a response.

or even:

Well I suppose brutally destroying one of it's main organs would probably constitute a demand for a response.

[–]ShinyPiplup 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Also:

You might injure it a bit, but I doubt anything serious to equate a response from it.

Wut.

I think the word he's looking for is "warrant."

[–]Saganomics 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (5子コメント)

I have little patience for this shit so here you go, pay special attention to definition 3 and the example given and you'll see how it's perfectly appropriate. There's nothing worse than grammar Nazis who don't even know their shit.

[–]Alexplode -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Brutally destroying one of it's main organs would probably constitute a response.

Brutally destroying one of it's main organs would probably be an adequate response to the shark attacking you.

The "response" he's referring to is done by the human, not the shark. I can see why you got confused though, it was rather ambiguous.

[–]shellbeach 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

All of that grammar rage and nobody notice the its

[–]lordlicorice -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's not ambiguous at all. He meant to say "warrant a response."

It makes no sense to suddenly introduce this "response" into his comment unless he's referencing the above:

That thing doesn't care what a human does. It can cut you in half with one bite. You might injure it a bit, but I doubt anything serious to equate a response from it.