use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
詳しくは検索FAQを参照
高度な検索: 投稿者や、subredditで……
109 現在のここのユーザー
Conservatism (Latin: conservare, "to retain") is a political and social philosophy that promotes retaining traditional social institutions.
Immigration Discussion Post
Sidebar Tribute History
Posting Guide
Our Twitter Page
U.S. Constitution Discussion
Use the report button for violations of the rules or message the modqueue.
We are for Conservatives (fiscal and social) to discuss political and cultural issues.
Non-conservatives are welcome as long as they are respectful and non-antagonistic towards Conservative posters and opinions at all times and have appropriate flair. (Click here to request flair.)
To debate and challenge Conservatism, visit Ask a Conservative.
Post no more than 4 submissions per hour.
Don't ask: "Why is this here?" or: "How is this Conservative?"
Don't complain how liberal /r/politics or Reddit is.
Don't post stories visible on the first page of "Hot" or "New."
Use the "np" prefix if you link to another subreddit.
Submit no more than one image post per day.
Don't complain about a topic or content of an article without offering substantive criticism.
Don't create meta discussion threads. Use Conservative Meta instead.
Don't create cross-subreddit drama or instigate vote brigading.
Don't post racist articles or comments.
Please see our Posting Guide for more details.
Ask a Conservative
Fiscal Conservative
Libertarian
Monarchism
New Right
Paleoconservative
Republican
Republicans
SocialConservative Click here to message the moderators for an invite.
Atheist Conservative
Conservative Meta
Convention of States
The Liberty Amendments
Best of Conservative
Conservative Ladies
Liberal
The Red Pill
The Red Pill Women
Catholicism
Entrepreneurship
Judaism
Personal Industry
Protestantism
Capitalism
Traditional Marriage Click here to message the moderators for an invite.
Immigration Reform
PornFree
ProLife
ProGun
Adam Carolla
Rand Paul
Ted Cruz
European New Right
Tory
Tories
Name one. (i.imgur.com)
robert32907Revanchist Conservative が 1 年 前 投稿
残りのコメントをみる →
[–]10-4 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント 1 年 前 (21子コメント)
Source?
[–]backnblack92Moderate Conservative 32 ポイント33 ポイント34 ポイント 1 年 前 (7子コメント)
stats from the DOJ website where that number comes from
article discussing it
another article
[–]MrKequc 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 1 年 前 (1子コメント)
There is a lot of information in that initial link. Mainly that race doesn't appear to have any correlation with amount of violent crime. There is a table in there that shows there is a correlation between household income and violent crime.
All it took was looking at the actual source material.
[–]JacksonMcNasty 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 1 年 前 (0子コメント)
And that initial link makes no distinction to "blacks killed by other blacks", especially in the 503 days over the course of the trial. The other 2 "sources" are just blogs. I doubt that 10,000+ homicide cases have already been wrapped up in that short time with convictions that can validate that stat.
[–]10-4 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 年 前 (0子コメント)
Thanks for sharing!
[–]AJinxyCat -5 ポイント-4 ポイント-3 ポイント 1 年 前 (3子コメント)
How the f does a comment just asking for a source have more up votes than the comment actually providing a source?
[–]masters1125### 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 1 年 前 (0子コメント)
And because the sources aren't very good.
[+]ScotchforBreakfast スコアが基準値未満のコメント-11 ポイント-10 ポイント-9 ポイント 1 年 前 (0子コメント)
Most liberals that come into this subreddit do so to downvote conservatives, concern troll and post condescending liberal circlejerk bullshit.
[+]AtheistConservativeNeoconservative スコアが基準値未満のコメント-8 ポイント-7 ポイント-6 ポイント 1 年 前 (8子コメント)
Look it up on the FBI uniform crime reports if nothing else.
[–]drdelius 20 ポイント21 ポイント22 ポイント 1 年 前 (7子コメント)
FYI: "Look it up" is not the correct response when a leery individual asks for source material (which should, frankly, be included in the material itself if it is to be taken seriously)
Remember, "Trust, but verify"
[–][deleted] -3 ポイント-2 ポイント-1 ポイント 1 年 前 (4子コメント)
Do you ask for sources every time someone says something to you in real life? Not everything is debate class. Sometimes people just talk and they gasp don't care whether you agree with them or not and they're not going to find a source for you. Man that guy has an obnoxious username, though.
[–]logicalthinker1Libertarian Conservative -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 1 年 前 (3子コメント)
Most people constantly ask for sources because they think it makes them sound smarter and more intellectual. A smart person knows when a source is required and when it is not. Especially on the science pages, they all think they are real scientists and act like it. There is never any critical thinking. In this case, the point of the post is to show that a lot of blacks have been killed by other blacks and that the media doesn't care because whitey didn't do it. It actually doesn't matter what the number is. It's only there to represent a large amount.
[–]masters1125### 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 年 前 (2子コメント)
Requesting a source when statistics are quoted is perfectly reasonable, especially when the statistic is particularly unbelievable.
[–]logicalthinker1Libertarian Conservative -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 1 年 前 (1子コメント)
I agree. But the point wasn't to show some exact number. It was to show that it's a large number.
[–]masters1125### 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 1 年 前 (0子コメント)
Then the graphic should have said "a lot."
[+][deleted] スコアが基準値未満のコメント-14 ポイント-13 ポイント-12 ポイント 1 年 前 (0子コメント)
If you don't trust it, verify it your own god damn self.
[+]AtheistConservativeNeoconservative スコアが基準値未満のコメント-18 ポイント-17 ポイント-16 ポイント 1 年 前 (0子コメント)
It's pretty widely known that blacks make up half of all murder victims, and there are about 14k murders per year.
[–]URPerfectConservative -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 1 年 前 (1子コメント)
So, he gave you the source (like you needed one), what do you have to say now? I hate when people ask for a source and then never reply to it. At least say thank you...
We care about your privacy, and we never spam. By creating an account, you agree to reddit's User Agreement and Privacy Policy. We're proud of them, and you should read them.
π Rendered by PID 7032 on app-218 at 2014-12-16 19:35:00.115699+00:00 running 1b1a7a2 country code: JP.
残りのコメントをみる →
[–]10-4 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント (21子コメント)
[–]backnblack92Moderate Conservative 32 ポイント33 ポイント34 ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]MrKequc 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]JacksonMcNasty 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]10-4 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]AJinxyCat -5 ポイント-4 ポイント-3 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]masters1125### 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]ScotchforBreakfast スコアが基準値未満のコメント-11 ポイント-10 ポイント-9 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]AtheistConservativeNeoconservative スコアが基準値未満のコメント-8 ポイント-7 ポイント-6 ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]drdelius 20 ポイント21 ポイント22 ポイント (7子コメント)
[–][deleted] -3 ポイント-2 ポイント-1 ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]logicalthinker1Libertarian Conservative -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]masters1125### 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]logicalthinker1Libertarian Conservative -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]masters1125### 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+][deleted] スコアが基準値未満のコメント-14 ポイント-13 ポイント-12 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]AtheistConservativeNeoconservative スコアが基準値未満のコメント-18 ポイント-17 ポイント-16 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]URPerfectConservative -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (1子コメント)