あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]DiamondDays19cmx14.5cm 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (49子コメント)

U

European and not a muslim so that should be expected. I do not get why circumcision is a thing in the us. It should be illegal.

[–]BetaMax789 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (40子コメント)

Why exactly should it be illegal?

[–]aleksthepster 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Unnecessary cosmetic surgery that the child doesn't need and didn't ask for. It really should be the sort of thing you yourself decide for yourself when you reach the legal age of consent, same as with other cosmetic procedures like piercings, tattoos, botox and implants.

[–]BetaMax789 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

That would make sense.

[–]SteelHurtin56 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (31子コメント)

Reddit has a big bias against circumcision. Not sure why. But it's not surprising to see comments like that.

[–]butterchickenkid7.5" x 6" 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (30子コメント)

I'm against it being done to someone without their consent and them having full understanding of what will happen. As long as they're say, >16 then I don't see an issue of them having it done.

[–]DiamondDays19cmx14.5cm 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Because it's butchering an infant who might not want to be butchered? I realize a majority of circumcised men are fine with it, but if they had the experience of not being circumcised i am sure they wouldn't be.

[–]BetaMax789 -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Are you aware of the definition of the word "butcher."

[–]DiamondDays19cmx14.5cm 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (3子コメント)

You're chopping off parts of a baby that shouldn't be chopped off. Butcher might be an exaggeration but you get my point. It's barbaric.

[–]BetaMax789 -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Are you also aware of the definition of barbaric?

[–]DiamondDays19cmx14.5cm 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

How deep do you want the explanation? Way back when it used to mean people who were not greek. Now it means people who indulge in backwards practices out of custom.

[–]stealingyourpixels 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Barbaric means primitive.

[–]SteelHurtin56 -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (7子コメント)

No it shouldn't.

[–]DiamondDays19cmx14.5cm 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (6子コメント)

Yeah, it should. You're cutting pieces of an infant that didn't choose to have pieces cut off of him. I don't even care if it's religious, mutilating your kids for cosmetic or moral reasons is wrong.

[–]SteelHurtin56 -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Haha it's hardly "mutilating", stop trying to overdramatize it. It's equivilant to piercing a baby's ear, and I don't see you getting all huffy about that. I'm sure you think you're being all noble, but just stop, because you sound ridiculously ignorant.

[–]wufoo2 -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (4子コメント)

equivalent to piercing a baby's ear

No, circumcision destroys half the penile skin and one third of the penile nerve endings.

[–]SteelHurtin56 -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Half? It's not even close to half. Also, there has never been a single study that concludes that circumsion destroys a third of nerve endings. There are far more health benefits than detriments, and if you bothered to look into it at all, you would know that.

[–]wufoo2 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

You have much to learn. Start here, if you're not afraid.

[–]SteelHurtin56 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

If you want a legitimate, unbiased source, start here.

[–]SteelHurtin56 -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, try getting your sources from an unbiased site first. Reconfirming your own beliefs through an anticircumcision website is called confirmation bias.

if you're not afraid.

lol just stop