あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]theymos 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (7子コメント)

There are many interesting things that you can do with Bitcoin besides just money, but for a website like this? Maybe authentication? Comment timestamping? Integrated tipping? I don't know... Maybe they'll surprise me, but I have a feeling that whatever they come out with will be either underwhelming or just downright wrong.

[–]bubbasparse[S] 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (6子コメント)

Integrated tipping would be disappointing?

[–]theymos 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (5子コメント)

One really cool thing they could do would be to require tipping for every comment/submission vote. There was a site called witcoin in 2011 that did that, and it worked pretty well. But this would be such a major change that I doubt they'd actually do it.

Off-topic random thought: Someone should recreate witcoin. How it worked was that upvoting something had a small fixed cost. A large amount of this money would go to the submitter, but some of the money would also go to everyone who upvoted the post previously, with far more money going to people who had upvoted the submission earlier. This encouraged people to patrol new posts and only upvote things that are actually good. A very small percentage of the upvote fee also went to the site, though this was enough to make the site pretty profitable. It was a very fun site IMO. (It was shut down because of unrelated issues experienced by the operator, not due to lack of success/popularity.)

[–]ryancarnated 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Yep, I remember witcoin and actually use it way back in the day. It was never super popular, but the core idea was there.

I had an idea for a different way to do this that would help with spam. Rather than actually spend money on upvoting, it could be based on simply proving that you have a certain amount of bitcoins buried in a certain number of blocks. That way you don't have to pay to upvote, but at the same time, it is not "free" exactly. Only people who actually have, say, at least 0.1 bitcoin buried under a bunch of blocks would be able to upvote. You couldn't create 1000 spam accounts for upvoting without locking up 100 bitcoins.

[–]MarketAhab 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (3子コメント)

I see what you're trying to get at with your idea, but thinking about it, it sounds absolutely horrible. What happens if someone is too poor to hold 0.1 BTC? It might not seem like a lot to you or me, but for someone who lives in a less developed country or someone who struggles to get by and lives paycheck to paycheck it could be very difficult. I don't think the rich or well off should be privileged in their voting abilities--that's one of the biggest things wrong with American society as it is right now, corporations and the rich can lobby ("vote") for things that benefit their own self interests. I'm not down-voting you or anything; I just disagree.

[–]ryancarnated 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Yep, you pretty much nailed the #1 problem with my idea and why I never actually bothered to build it. However, I think there's something amazing about the possibility of building it, so I figured it was worth sharing the idea.

[–]MarketAhab 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Maybe linking up to a social network or something to verify a user's identity would be less problematic. Some people might have a privacy concern doing that of course, but as long as it was just a verification method, I think most people would be ok with it.

[–]rondeline 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

What if you could sponsor someone as well? I'll share my .1 BTC with my friend who I know won't be called out as a spammer.

Spammers would of course sponsor themselves, but least then they would be linked accounts so you could trouble shoot spammers in mass more effectively.

That would also answer /u/MarketAhab's point in that you wouldn't need to ask Reddit's user base to hook up to social networks.

You probably thought of that..if not, can I drop my mic now?