We use cookies to help us deliver our online services. By using our website or by closing this message box, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Cookie Policy.
Do not show again
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers visit http://www.djreprints.com.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/hundreds-of-police-killings-are-uncounted-in-federal-statistics-1417577504
  • 1348
  • 1228
  • Text Size
  • Regular
  • Medium
  • Large
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Print

Hundreds of Police Killings Are Uncounted in Federal Stats

FBI Data Differs from Local Counts on Justifiable Homicides

A WSJ analysis finds hundreds of homicides by law enforcement agencies in the U.S. between 2007 and 2012 are not included in FBI records. WSJ's Rob Barry reports. Photo: iStock/Juanmonino
.
By
Rob Barry And
Coulter Jones
WASHINGTON—When 24-year-old Albert Jermaine Payton wielded a knife in front of the police in this city’s southeast corner, officers opened fire and killed him.
Yet according to national statistics intended to track police killings, Mr. Payton’s death in August 2012 never happened. It is one of hundreds of homicides by law-enforcement agencies between 2007 and 2012 that aren’t included in records kept by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
A Wall Street Journal analysis of the latest data from 105 of the country’s largest police agencies found more than 550 police killings during those years were missing from the national tally or, in a few dozen cases, not attributed to the agency involved. The result: It is nearly impossible to determine how many people are killed by the police each year.

Interactive: Justifiable Homicides by Law Enforcement

ENLARGE
.
Public demands for transparency on such killings have increased since the August shooting death of 18-year-old Michael Brown by police in Ferguson, Mo. The Ferguson Police Department has reported to the FBI one justifiable homicide by police between 1976 and 2012.
Law-enforcement experts long have lamented the lack of information about killings by police. “When cops are killed, there is a very careful account and there’s a national database,” said Jeffrey Fagan, a law professor at Columbia University. “Why not the other side of the ledger?”
Police can use data about killings to improve tactics, particularly when dealing with people who are mentally ill, said Paco Balderrama, a spokesman for the Oklahoma City Police Department. “It’s great to recognize that, because 30 years ago we used to not do that. We used to just show up and handle the situation.”
Three sources of information about deaths caused by police—the FBI numbers, figures from the Centers for Disease Control and data at the Bureau of Justice Statistics—differ from one another widely in any given year or state, according to a 2012 report by David Klinger, a criminologist with the University of Missouri-St. Louis and a onetime police officer.
To analyze the accuracy of the FBI data, the Journal requested internal records on killings by officers from the nation’s 110 largest police departments. One-hundred-five of them provided figures.
Those internal figures show 1,825 police killings in those 105 departments between 2007 and 2012, 47% more than the FBI’s tally for justifiable homicides in those departments’ jurisdictions, which was 1,242, according to the Journal’s analysis. Nearly all police killings are deemed by the departments or other authorities to be justifiable.
The full national scope of the underreporting can’t be quantified. In the period analyzed by the Journal, 753 police entities reported about 2,400 killings by police. The large majority of the nation’s roughly 18,000 law-enforcement agencies didn’t report any.
A memorial in Ferguson, Mo., in August at the location where Michael Brown was shot to death by a police officer. ENLARGE
A memorial in Ferguson, Mo., in August at the location where Michael Brown was shot to death by a police officer. Getty Images
.
“Does the FBI know every agency in the U.S. that could report but has chosen not to? The answer is no,” said Alexia Cooper, a statistician with the Bureau of Justice Statistics who studies the FBI’s data. “What we know is that some places have chosen not to report these, for whatever reason.”
FBI spokesman Stephen G. Fischer said the agency uses “established statistical methodologies and norms” when reviewing data submitted by agencies. FBI staffers check the information, then ask agencies “to correct or verify questionable data,” he said.
The reports to the FBI are part of its uniform crime reporting program. Local law-enforcement agencies aren’t required to participate. Some localities turn over crime statistics, but not detailed records describing each homicide, which is the only way particular kinds of killings, including those by police, are tracked by the FBI. The records, which are supposed to document every homicide, are sent from local police agencies to state reporting bodies, which forward the data to the FBI.
The Journal’s analysis identified several holes in the FBI data.
Justifiable police homicides from 35 of the 105 large agencies contacted by the Journal didn’t appear in the FBI records at all. Some agencies said they didn’t view justifiable homicides by law-enforcement officers as events that should be reported. The Fairfax County Police Department in Virginia, for example, said it didn’t consider such cases to be an “actual offense,” and thus doesn’t report them to the FBI.
For 28 of the remaining 70 agencies, the FBI was missing records of police killings in at least one year. Two departments said their officers didn’t kill anyone during the period analyzed by the Journal.
About a dozen agencies said their police-homicides tallies didn’t match the FBI’s because of a quirk in the reporting requirements: Incidents are supposed to be reported by the jurisdiction where the event occurred, even if the officer involved was from elsewhere. For example, the California Highway Patrol said there were 16 instances in which one of its officers killed someone in a city or other local jurisdiction responsible for reporting the death to the FBI. In some instances reviewed by the Journal, an agency believed its officers’ justifiable homicides had been reported by other departments, but they hadn’t.
Also missing from the FBI data are killings involving federal officers.
ENLARGE
.
Police in Washington, D.C., didn’t report to the FBI details about any homicides for an entire decade beginning with 1998—the year the Washington Post found the city had one of the highest rates of officer-involved killings in the country. In 2011, the agency reported five killings by police. In 2012, the year Mr. Payton was killed, there are again no records on homicides from the agency.
D.C. Metropolitan Police Chief Cathy Lanier said she doesn’t know why the agency stopped reporting the numbers in 1998. “I wasn’t the chief and had no role in decision making” back then, said Ms. Lanier, who was a captain at the time. When she took over in 2007, she said, reporting the statistics “was a nightmare and a very tedious process.”
Ms. Lanier said her agency resumed its reports in 2009. In 2012, the agency turned over the detailed homicide records, she said, but the data had an error in it and was rejected by the FBI. She referred questions about why the department stopped reporting homicides in 1998 to former Chief Charles H. Ramsey, now head of the Philadelphia Police Department. Mr. Ramsey declined to comment.
In recent years, police departments have tried to rely more on statistics to develop better tactics. “You want to get the data right,” said Mike McCabe, the undersheriff of the Oakland County Sheriff’s Office in Michigan. It is “really important in terms of how you deploy your resources.”
A total of 100 agencies provided the Journal with numbers of people killed by police each year from 2007 through 2012; five more provided statistics for some years. Several, including the police departments in New York City, Los Angeles, Philadelphia and Austin, Texas, post detailed use-of-force reports online.
Five of the 110 agencies the Journal contacted, including the Michigan State Police, didn’t provide internal figures. A spokeswoman for the Michigan State Police said the agency had records of police shootings, but “not in tally form.”
Big increases in the numbers of officer-involved killings can be a red flag about problems inside a police department, said Mike White, a criminologist at Arizona State University. “Sometimes that can be tied to poor leadership and problems with accountability,” he said.
The FBI has almost no records of police shootings from departments in three of the most populous states in the country—Florida, New York and Illinois.
In Florida, available reports from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement don’t conform to FBI requirements and haven’t been included in the national tally since 1996. A spokeswoman for the state agency said in an email that Florida was “unable” to meet the FBI’s reporting requirements because its tracking software was outdated.
New York revamped its reporting system in 2002 and 2006, but isn’t able to track information about justifiable police homicides, said a spokeswoman for the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services. She said the agency was “looking to modify our technology so we can reflect these numbers.”
In 1987, a commission created by then-Governor Mario Cuomo to investigate abuse of force by police found that New York’s reports to the FBI were “inadequate and incomplete,” and urged reforms to “hold government accountable for the use of force.” The spokeswoman for the state criminal-justice agency said it isn’t clear what the agency did in response back then.
Illinois only began reporting crime statistics to the FBI in 2010 and hasn’t phased in the detailed homicide reports. “We cannot begin adding additional pieces because we are newcomers to the federal program,” said Terri Hickman, director of the Illinois State Police’s crime-reporting program. Two agencies in Illinois deliver data to the FBI: Chicago and Rockford.
In Washington, D.C., councilman Tommy Wells held two hearings this fall on police oversight. He said he was surprised that the department hadn’t reported details of police killings to the FBI. “That should not be a challenge,” he said.
More than two years after the knife-carrying Mr. Payton was shot and killed by D.C. police, his mother, who witnessed the killing, said she is still looking for answers. Helena Payton, 59, said her son had many interactions with local police because of what she said was his mental illness. “All the cops in the Seventh District knew him, just about,” she said.
The officers who arrived that Friday afternoon in August, in response to a call from Mr. Payton’s girlfriend, had never dealt with her son, she said. According to Ms. Payton, her son walked outside holding a small utility knife. As he approached the officers, they fired dozens of bullets at him, she said. He died soon after.
The U.S. attorney’s office is reviewing the incident, as is customary in all police shootings in Washington. A spokesman for the office declined to comment on the status of the case. The Washington police department, citing the continuing investigation, declined to provide the officers’ names, a narrative of what happened, or basic information usually included in the reports to the FBI, such as the number of officers involved in the shooting.
The officers involved are back on duty, according to D.C. authorities, but the case isn’t closed.
Write to Rob Barry at rob.barry@wsj.com and Coulter Jones at Coulter.Jones@wsj.com
  • 1348
  • 1228
  • Text Size
  • Regular
  • Medium
  • Large
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Print
262 comments
+ Follow
Post comment
 
Link
Walter Altholz
Walter Altholz subscriber 5pts
Of course, all other government data is completely accurate. Give me a break.

Without minimizing the horrific impact of these deaths, and to a lesser degree, the pain that accompanies their lack of statistical recognition, this is a lamentable rounding error that is a distraction from the larger issues. It would be overwhelmed, if only a fraction of the unsolved homicides were solved. That, statistic, however wouldn't fit into the political narrative of these authors as, if it stayed consistent with current statistics, it would add to the huge amount of black on black homicides (90% of black homicides committed by blacks) . Where is the focus on preventing that epidemic that claims the lives of the totally innocent (as opposed to Travon Martin and Michael Brown who at the least were complicit in their own deaths) at a truly tragic rate? This administration's focus on totally bogus issues is another of their distractions, deceitful, subversive and effective.
CASEY ELLIOTT
CASEY ELLIOTT subscriber 5pts
At one time, doctors participated in a peer review process to determine how mistakes were made and how to prevent such errors.  This practice was dropped in the U.S. due to torts and liability.  Too bad.
It seems critical that police officers and agents who are involved in a justifiable homicide should be peer reviewed after the legal issues are settled to determine what happened, what could be done differently to change the outcome and to help the officers get past the trauma. This information should be shared with other law enforcement professionals.  Of course, tort and liability would have to be eliminated.
It sounds like second guessing but it would help hone law enforcement's response to dangerous encounters.
Frank Mostek
Frank Mostek subscriber 5pts
I'm all for transparency but what would the FBI do with all this data if they had it?  Isn't it presumptuous to think that this problem can be solved by the FBI?  Does the Federal government even have the authority to regulate local and state police?  I think not but it appears the Constitution is no longer being used by the Federal government.

Seems like all the focus on Ferguson is on the police.  How about some $$ and "research" on preventing crime and violent interactions with the police to begin with?

ronald alexander
ronald alexander subscriber 5pts
There needs to be (a) updated training and operations manuals stressing de-escalation and the avoidance of the use of force, especially lethal force, (b) annual training academies for all police officers, (c) rigorous disciplinary proceedings within the police departments, (d) rigorous prosecutions, where warranted, by DAs (no whitewashing), (e) the recruitment of minority police officers for inner city and minority neighborhoods, and (f) the building of community relationships, fostering mutual trust and respect.

Each case must be reviewed on its own facts.  Thus, no indictment in Ferguson may be justified, while a very close examination of the strangling death in New York may warrant an indictment (I don't know enough of the NY facts).  These are not inconsistent positions: just different conclusions driven by potentially different facts. 

Police officers represent the full force of the state: it must be used with great caution & be subject to rigorous review & discipline for abuse.
Tomas Pajaros
Tomas Pajaros subscriber 5pts
Transparency is the best disinfectant.    Police should welcome it as well.    I'm generally a law&order guy, and I would like to know that our finest, who are putting themselves in potential danger every working day while I sit at my desk, are also committed to being accountable.

It would also set a good example that our President, Attorney General, and IRS Commissioner should take note of.
SCOTT VANKUREN
SCOTT VANKUREN subscriber 5pts
Perhaps just once, the nations law enforcement community should stage a national call out day.

Every cop, including those protecting Obama, the Congress, and all of the other government dignitaries, should just call in sick. Announce it well in advance, with as much fanfare as the Congressional Black Caucus does when it now takes the stage to humiliate them, and let's see what happens.

My bet is that there would be a lot less guilt ridden white liberals giving comfort to lawlwess blacks, and that the gun lobby would gain many new members.
ANDREI RADULESCU-BANU
ANDREI RADULESCU-BANU subscriber 5pts
It's quite simple. Yank federal dollars earmarked to state law enforcement until police killings are all reported. This can be fixed in a heartbeat by the Federal Govt.
Jeffrey Tierney
Jeffrey Tierney subscriber 5pts
What oversight?  The law enforcement community is militarized now and the decision makers/wealthy are completely happy with that.  Do you really think they care if the police are somewhat heavy handed and shoot citizens that may not deserve it every now and then.  I don't think so.  You want justice.  You better have some connections and be able to pay for it.  Otherwise our law enforcement and judicial system is not your friend.
Tim Downey
Tim Downey subscriber 5pts
Regarding mental illness, the interaction between a knife or bullet and a body is entirely unaffected by the mental status of the person using the weapon.
As a society, we are recognizing mental illnesses, which is a positive. But we tend to also excuse just plain criminality as illness.
John Canfield
John Canfield subscriber 5pts
 "Big increases in the numbers of officer-involved killings can be a red flag about problems inside a police department, said Mike White, a criminologist at Arizona State University."
Or not Mr. White - correlation does not imply causation.  We call this a logical fallacy, suggest you spend some time reviewing them.
Michael Wood
Michael Wood subscriber 5pts
An article about bookkeeping errors on the front page?  Really?
Michael Wood
Michael Wood subscriber 5pts
“You want to get the data right,” said Mike McCabe, the undersheriff of the Oakland County Sheriff’s Office in Michigan. It is “really important in terms of how you deploy your resources.”

OK...but how does precisely reporting the data to the federal government further that objective?  And if the data the feds accumulate is not exactly accurate...so what?  Does it change the conclusions based on the trends?
Russell Taylor
Russell Taylor subscriber 5pts
So. This is a lot of chatter about nothing. State and local police are not accountable to the FBI. That's why data is not complete. It's not rocket surgery:)
Wallace Schwam
Wallace Schwam subscriber 5pts
We need a good statistic to determine racial bias in  cases of "justifiable homicide".  As a beginning consider:  The % of assaults committed by race (X) per year divided by the % of race (X) in the total population.  If the number of "Justifiable Homicides"  exceed this amount in a year by two standard deviations, racial bias might be inferred.  Otherwise, police are just protecting themselves in proportion to the danger of assault from  members of the racial group (X).
JEFFREY DUGAS
JEFFREY DUGAS subscriber 5pts
Who cares about the Federal Bureau of Incompetence.  They have no jurisdiction in state and local matters.  The entire federal government, under the constitution, has limited powers anyway and is subservient to the states and the people.


John Miller
John Miller subscriber 5pts
Why is the CDC tracking police killings?
What relevancy do police shootings data have to disease control?
What disease is being tracked?
Karl Noell
Karl Noell subscriber 5pts
This gets into States' Rights issues. Why should it be a Federal mandate that States provide local data to the Federal government? Or even worse, to the CDC. If that inconveniences the media, well, Yawn.
Adam Marley
Adam Marley subscriber 5pts
To any policeman, firefighters or soldiers reading this article, Thank You for your service! We have your back!
Todd Granger
Todd Granger subscriber 5pts
@Frank Mostek Frank, the FBI has a J E Hoover building?

Mirror Mirror on the Wall...

Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241
Conspiracy Against Rights
Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to ten years, or both; and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years, or for life, or may be sentenced to death.

who's the biggest criminal of them all?

Julie Keene
Julie Keene subscriber 5pts

I think the expression is that sunshine is the best disinfectant. But the sentiment is the same.
Tim Reynolds
Tim Reynolds subscriber 5pts
@SCOTT VANKUREN There would be a lot of dead looters and empty brass laying on the streets the next day.
Frank Mostek
Frank Mostek subscriber 5pts
@ANDREI RADULESCU-BANU "yank federal dollars...."  You mean not give back the money that was confiscated from the state by the federal government?  Sounds like coersion to me.  As much as we want transparency, regulating local and state police isn't exactly an enumerated authority given to the Federal government but who cares about that 10th amendment, right?

Karl Noell
Karl Noell subscriber 5pts
@Paul Dacher Why do you presume Grassley has standing to inquire into a local Virginia matter? Because he is a -gasp- Senator? I like Grassley a lot, but this a Virginia matter.
Jerome Abernathy
Jerome Abernathy subscriber 5pts
@Jeffrey Tierney As a retired cop once told me, "our job was to protect wealth people from everyone else".

The police need to be demilitarized.  Take back all the Rinos and assault weapons.  Make them stop wearing desert camouflage.  Get them out of their cars and among the people.  Hire cops that live in the communities they serve.

I think the majority of Americans are tired of seeing kids die in hails of bullets from frightened, trigger-happy cops.  Enough!
Barnaby Thieme
Barnaby Thieme subscriber 5pts
@John Canfield Hence his use of the verb "can." In the English language, "can" means "may" or "could be," not "is."
Matthew Haley
Matthew Haley subscriber 5pts
@Michael Wood An article about government officials hiding ~50% of the homicides they commit on the front page?  Really?  I sure hope so.
Arthur Buck
Arthur Buck subscriber 5pts
@Elvir Mujanovic ... I thought you liberals were all FOR Unions keeping the "poor working stiff" employed and help step in to keep them from getting fired.
When did your stance change?
Greg Sutton
Greg Sutton subscriber 5pts
@Wallace Schwam And we of course know the Feds can be absolutely counted on to accurately report these statistics, with no manipulation, hard disk crashes, bias or agenda.
Gerald Hanner
Gerald Hanner subscriber 5pts

"Who cares about the Federal Bureau of Incompetence.  They have no jurisdiction in state and local matters."

Yeah.  Right.  Tell that to Eric Holder.
Paul Dacher
Paul Dacher subscriber 5pts
@John Miller The CDC tracks all mortalities as part of its vital statistics system:  "Mortality data from the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) are a fundamental source of demographic, geographic, and cause-of-death information. This is one of the few sources of health-related data that are comparable for small geographic areas and are available for a long time period in the United States. The data are also used to present the characteristics of those dying in the United States, to determine life expectancy, and to compare mortality trends with other countries."

Todd Granger
Todd Granger subscriber 5pts
@Karl Noell States rights, went away with the Articles of Confederation. The Stars and Bars(D) still confuse many.

Did that Washington Monument confuse Martha too?
Jim Markey
Jim Markey subscriber 5pts
@Julie Keene @Frank Mostek Agreed.   And the police involved in any homicide should also already be filing reports and having their involvement investigated, so filing another short report shouldn't be much more effort.
Todd Granger
Todd Granger subscriber 5pts
@Matthew Haley @SCOTT VANKUREN Yes Dead looters, brought to YOU, by George Washington and Americans.

Keep Your Powder Dry, 2nd. Right after your papers, 1st.

Kindergarden Klass, always confuses the Klowns.

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation...

Paul Dacher
Paul Dacher subscriber 5pts
@Karl Noell @Paul Dacher Grassley has standing because he is currently the minority head of the Senate Judiciary Committee.  The Committee has jurisdiction over the Department of Justice, which is investigating the shooting.
Elvir Mujanovic
Elvir Mujanovic subscriber 5pts
@Arthur Buck Good morning Arthur. How are you doing? Did you have a good Thanksgiving?

What stance are you referring to? Are you specifically referring to some instance where I defended unions and their stance on keeping poor performers employed? If so, I must have forgotten and hope you can provide some proof of that.  It is possible that you are confusing me with simple minded right wingers who don't know any better than to parrot party line as it is fed to them by FoxNews and Rush...
JEFFREY DUGAS
JEFFREY DUGAS subscriber 5pts

Ah, more uninformed people who just don't get it.  The Civil War has nothing to do with anything you are babbling about.

The states delegated limited powers to the federal government when ratifying the Constitution.

Federalist 45:

"The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite."

The 9th and 10th amendments underscore this.

The FBI only has jurisdiction in interstate crime. Not state and local law enforcement.



Adam Marley
Adam Marley subscriber 5pts
@Michael Bergbauer @Adam Marley Naive? No, I just simply have respect for the people who work on behalf of my safety. Sacrifice their lives, their livlihoods and time with their families to keep my community and my country a place where I can walk the streets without worry. Guess what, Michael, I have never been arrested, never been threatened by a cop, because I follow the law. It's a simple concept.
Adam Marley
Adam Marley subscriber 5pts
@Todd Granger @Adam Marley Todd, while you sit in your ivory tower, the police, servicemen and firefighters wake up each day to protect the safety of law abiding Americans. Our country has villified entrepreneurs, capitalists who create jobs and now servicemen? We make martyrs and heroes out of criminals. Get your heads checked. My wife's grandmother was killed in a bank robbery, innocent, law abiding people I know have been raped by criminals. Disarm the police? Don't trust the badge, the uniforms these civil servants wear, the cops are secretly against us? The police are the "control" we have against violent acts against the innocent. Disarm your police, but not mine.
Matthew Haley
Matthew Haley subscriber 5pts
@Adam Marley, A few bad cops, and even a few mistakes that aren't criminal but are hidden diminish the respect many would otherwise hold for the police.  Just as the "blue line" had to be pierced to get criminals out of the forces, obfuscating data has to be destroyed to show everyone that police aren't acting criminally.
Todd Granger
Todd Granger subscriber 5pts
@Adam Marley @Todd Granger Adam, I learned very early at my State Trooper Academy that criminals get into policing very early in their careers.

The FBI showed up at my class, and hauled off one model in an Orange Jumpsuit, leg irons and chains.

Your Ivory Tower, does it lean left much?

Keep and Bear…means own and Carry!
Adam Marley
Adam Marley subscriber 5pts
@Matthew Haley @Adam Marley Matthew, I appreciate a logical response to the emotional issue. I disagree with WSJ's choice to use the word "homicide" in relation to their findings. Is it possible the local police departments mask the data to protect the public from outrageous behavior as we just saw in Fergusson?
Is it also possible that police departments don't report the data to protect themselves from federal investigations from the DOJ and other red tape that could hinder their budgets and the way they police their unique communities?
Adam Marley
Adam Marley subscriber 5pts
@Todd Granger @Adam Marley I exercise my second amendment rights and in the example you described above it sounds like justice was served. Are 100% of all cops honest? No, but you can't take the exception to make the rule (or popular opinion in liberal media).
Show More Archives

Discover your perfect home

to

$1,900,000

Windham, NY

4 Bd 4 Ba

$299,000

Starkey, NY

1 Bd 1 Ba

$1,549,000

Brooklyn, NY

3 Bd 3 Ba

Popular on WSJ

Editors’ Picks

Copyright 2014 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%