あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]BitchesLoveCoffee 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I know this is racist, yada yada, but serious question - white people apparently kicked ass and took names. Sailed the oceans, bought and traded people and goods, came to American and crushed the natives under their heel and started the industrial revolution. Without white people and Mongols basically rolling over everyone else throughout history, we wouldn't live in a stable and cushy enough society to give a shit about things like race privilege, it would still be "the strong survive". So while blacks were living in tribes and throwing sticks with pointy bits at each other, whites were taking over shit. Before that, Asians took over shit. Other races have done far more because they got off their asses, banded together and did shit. Blacks have, as a whole, not. And it's not because they were slaves, humans are made of the same basic stuff. There's no reason why they couldn't have built boats and established trade routes and such, sailing the seas and discovering new worlds and building better weapons. I don't understand why the person who wins the game of risk should now be groveling in shame before the losers and saying "Here, take my spoils, I'm ashamed to have them. Please shame my decedents and make them your slaves". Outside of internety bullshit and first world made up problems, the way the world works is - the smarter, the stronger and the harder working survive. No shits given about skin color or gender. And even within that, it rains on the just and the unjust. So why....have people forgotten that?