WendyMcElroy.com

Re: Introducing Jamie

Many religious fanatics jump to the false conclusion that the fact that they are "persecuted" or that their "gospel" is "rejected" are somehow "proof" of the "truth" of their "gospel."

Which appears to be the tack he's on. He's proven his narrative to himself - therefore everyone who shows him his faulty assumptions and errors is persecuting him. Quod Erat Demonstrandum Persequendo.

Re: Introducing Jamie

Quote from: James Redford on October 30, 2014, 12:00:27 AM

You indeed have engaged in sadistic and psychopathic behavior toward me.

On the contrary, I have applied some of the mildest sanctions in my arsenal as forum admin. ...

Let us pause to consider your statement right there.

Your statement there is false. You have behaved toward me as a fascist mindset. That is, you have behaved toward me as a problem to be contained and squashed.

Whereas Jeremy Sapienza on the Anti-State.com forum allowed me to express myself rather freely, and the Anti-State.com forum was made all the better for it.

As well, there are a number of other forums wherein I have posted where I was far more free than here, including much larger and more "mainstream" forums.

So, no, you are a very uptight personality.

... I deleted your signature and blocked you from reinstating it, and I tagged your user name as "annoyance."  This after you were quite insulting, including calling me "Fascist" and a "sphincter."  When you then whined about those actions, I changed your avatar.

But then, as you here demonstrate, I was correct in all of those things that I said about you.

And you are here admitting that you are engaging in personal retribution.

Note also that it was your own pettiness and hatred against me which incited me to make such veridical observations. Had you been a mature individual to begin with then such observations by me would have never come about.

Of course, I was unaware at the time that not only are we in the presence of a rare genius among physicists, and a sexual performer without equal, but also a qualified expert in psychoanalysis. </sarc>

If you were not aware before, then you ought to become so, because that is perfectly the case.

Yet you make that out to be something amazing.

Again, you show your own insecurities and sense of inadequacy thereby.

Your problem here is that you do not believe that God exists.

But God does exist.

I myself haven't thought of my InfiniLast sexual technique as something so amazing that most males can't learn it. Indeed, it is very easy to learn.

But if you just dismiss me, as you are doing here, then you will lose out on something that is truly wonderful and amazing.

You have, frankly, been a boorish guest, ...

No, you have been a very rude host, and with no just cause other than that you very much dislike my message.

And that message being by me: God exists.

Whereupon I provide the mathematical proof of that per all confirmed physical laws of empirical science.

... and if others here think less of me for my actions towards you, that is a burden that comes with the job.  As for my own self-opinion, I strive to live up to Oscar Wilde's definition of a gentleman: "A gentleman is one who never hurts anyone's feelings unintentionally."

Re: Introducing Jamie

Quote from: gdp on October 30, 2014, 06:11:26 PM

Many religious fanatics jump to the false conclusion that the fact that they are "persecuted" or that their "gospel" is "rejected" are somehow "proof" of the "truth" of their "gospel."

Which appears to be the tack he's on. He's proven his narrative to himself - therefore everyone who shows him his faulty assumptions and errors is persecuting him. Quod Erat Demonstrandum Persequendo.

Actually, the existence of God is a mathematical theorem per the known laws of physics, of which have been confirmed my every experiment to date. For the details on that, see my below article, which details physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology and the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model Theory of Everything (TOE) correctly describing and unifying all the forces in physics. The Omega Point cosmology demonstrates that the known laws of physics (viz., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics) require that the universe end in the Omega Point: the final cosmological singularity and state of infinite informational capacity having all the unique properties traditionally claimed for God, and of which is a different aspect of the Big Bang initial singularity, i.e., the first cause. The Omega Point cosmology has been published and extensively peer-reviewed in leading physics journals.

James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708; PDF, 1741424 bytes, MD5: 8f7b21ee1e236fc2fbb22b4ee4bbd4cb, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1974708 , http://archive.org/download/ThePhysicsOfGodAndTheQuantumGravityTheoryOfEverything/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf , http://theophysics.host56.com/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf , http://alphaomegapoint.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/redford-physics-of-god.pdf , http://sites.google.com/site/physicotheism/home/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf .

Additionally, in the below resource are six sections which contain very informative videos of Prof. Tipler explaining the Omega Point cosmology and the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model TOE. The seventh section therein contains an audio interview of Tipler. I also provide some helpful notes and commentary for some of these videos.

James Redford, "Video of Profs. Frank Tipler and Lawrence Krauss's Debate at Caltech: Can Physics Prove God and Christianity?", alt.sci.astro, Message-ID: jghev8tcbv02b6vn3uiq8jmelp7jijluqk@4ax.com , 30 Jul 2013 00:51:55 -0400, https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.sci.astro/KQWt4KcpMVo , http://archive.today/a04w9 , http://webcitation.org/6IUTAMEyS . The plain text of this post is available at: TXT, 42423 bytes, MD5: b199e867e42d54b2b8bf6adcb4127761, http://mirrorcreator.com/files/JCFTZSS8/ , http://ge.tt/3lOTVbp .

Re: Introducing Jamie

Whereas Jeremy Sapienza on the Anti-State.com forum allowed me to express myself rather freely, and the Anti-State.com forum was made all the better for it.

In your, far from humble, opinion.

As well, there are a number of other forums wherein I have posted where I was far more free than here, including much larger and more "mainstream" forums.

Except for my deleting your short story, as inappropriate for this forum, your posting privileges here have not been restricted, and your posts have not been edited.  So I presume that "far more free" in this sentence means "allowed to indulge your literary pretensions."

And if you are far more free at "much larger and more 'mainstream' forums," then why bother us here?

Go away, you tiresome person.

Re: Introducing Jamie

As as matter of fact, I do have very severe problems with my bladder, due to my stays in jail.

I have an interest in those who resist civil authority and the methods they use - so I'd be interested in hearing about Redford's "stays in jail":

• Was he being held awaiting trial? Or were these for actual convictions, or possibly contempt of court actions?
• If convictions, what were the charges?
• If convictions, were they rendered by a jury or a judge?

Re: Introducing Jamie

Quote from: James Redford on October 31, 2014, 10:28:50 PM

Whereas Jeremy Sapienza on the Anti-State.com forum allowed me to express myself rather freely, and the Anti-State.com forum was made all the better for it.

In your, far from humble, opinion.

You think of me as nonhumble. But actually what I am is radically truthful, which appears as nonhumble to those who are estranged to it ("it" being truth, that is).

I have been very forthright in what is typically regarded as embarrassing physical maladies concerning myself.

No. I have died many times over. I have died to myself.

My flesh is a weight and burden which I seek to slough off.

Quote

As well, there are a number of other forums wherein I have posted where I was far more free than here, including much larger and more "mainstream" forums.

Except for my deleting your short story, as inappropriate for this forum, your posting privileges here have not been restricted, and your posts have not been edited.  So I presume that "far more free" in this sentence means "allowed to indulge your literary pretensions."

No, Brad R, you put up what you imagined to be an embarrassing avatar picture of me while restricting me from modifying it.

I have never before encountered such hateful and disrespectful behavior on a forum. The worst I've encountered is that forum-moderators simply either prevent me from posting or delete my account.

And if you are far more free at "much larger and more 'mainstream' forums," then why bother us here?

Go away, you tiresome person.

I've been away for a long while, yet you bozos started a thread (this very thread) and had a long discussion about (what you think is) me.

So now that the party is over and I'm back to actually speak for myself, I'm a "tiresome person". Isn't that grand. Isn't that so convenient.

The discussion within this thread was going along so swimmingly until I showed up, upon which I became a "tiresome person". Yet this thread itself is about me.

So it's funny (as in bizarre) to me that someone could think of me as being a "tiresome person", meanwhile a multi-page thread has been underway about me without my knowledge or input.

So sure, people have no interest in me. Uh hum.

----------

Look, do you really want me to cut through all the crap and get down to the nitty-gritty? (Not that I have ever spoken crap or been evasive, but people are nevertheless hardheaded, however plainly truth is spoken.)

What I am attempting to prepare you for is mass-death. But also mass-life.

I am crying so hard right now because you hardheaded people have no concept of what is coming upon you.

Anyway, there is really nothing to be said about this matter more than I have already said.

My below articles explain to people (1) theological ethics and soteriology in a comprehensive and logically-coherent manner; (2) how the known laws of physics prove God's existence while demonstrating the exacting and extensive consilience of the New Testament with said physical laws; (3) the nature of God in light of said physical laws; (4) the End Time, the Tribulation, the Second Coming of Jesus Christ, the foundation of Heaven on Earth, and the universal resurrection of the dead in light of said physical laws; and (5) the End Time in light of the history of the globalist oligarchy's self-termed New World Order world government and world religion agenda.

Item No. 1 is important vis-à-vis salvation for those who maintain that they already believe in Jesus Christ's Godhead. Items Nos. 2-5 are important in letting atheists, believers in other religions, and nominal ersatz "Christians" know that God as described by the New Testament does exist and that the New Testament is true. Items Nos. 2-5 are additionally important in giving believers in Christ a much deeper understanding of God and of the End Time, so that they may be strengthened in their faith during the extreme horrors to come and so that they will not fall for the deceptions of the Beast governmental system.

My following articles distill all of the most important aspects of veridical human knowledge into a comprehensive, coherent and unified whole: from theology, physics, science, ethics, legal theory, political theory, economics, sociology, epistemology to history.

James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708; PDF, 1741424 bytes, MD5: 8f7b21ee1e236fc2fbb22b4ee4bbd4cb. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1974708 , http://archive.org/download/ThePhysicsOfGodAndTheQuantumGravityTheoryOfEverything/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf , http://theophysics.host56.com/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf , http://alphaomegapoint.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/redford-physics-of-god.pdf , http://sites.google.com/site/physicotheism/home/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf

James Redford, "Video of Profs. Frank Tipler and Lawrence Krauss's Debate at Caltech: Can Physics Prove God and Christianity?", alt.sci.astro, Message-ID: jghev8tcbv02b6vn3uiq8jmelp7jijluqk@4ax.com , July 30, 2013. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.sci.astro/KQWt4KcpMVo , http://archive.is/a04w9 , http://webcitation.org/6IUTAMEyS The plain text of this post is available at: TXT, 42423 bytes, MD5: b199e867e42d54b2b8bf6adcb4127761. http://mirrorcreator.com/files/JCFTZSS8/ , http://ge.tt/3lOTVbp

James Redford, "Jesus Is an Anarchist", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Dec. 4, 2011 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2001), 60 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1337761; PDF, 312715 bytes, MD5: ff45387b1b2ed9d6dec411d5328abdd6. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1337761 , http://archive.org/download/JesusIsAnAnarchist/Redford-Jesus-Is-an-Anarchist.pdf , http://theophysics.host56.com/anarchist-jesus.pdf , http://webcitation.org/66AIz2rJw , http://pdf-archive.com/2013/09/10/redford-jesus-is-an-anarchist/redford-jesus-is-an-anarchist.pdf

James Redford, "Libertarian Anarchism Is Apodictically Correct", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Dec. 15, 2011, 9 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1972733; PDF, 118091 bytes, MD5: e6de8181ad84c9d96400bb9582311c79. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1972733 , http://archive.org/download/LibertarianAnarchismIsApodicticallyCorrect/Redford-Apodictic-Libertarianism.pdf , http://theophysics.host56.com/Redford-Apodictic-Libertarianism.pdf , http://webcitation.org/63xyCLjLm , http://pdf-archive.com/2013/09/10/redford-apodictic-libertarianism/redford-apodictic-libertarianism.pdf

Re: Introducing Jamie

I have never before encountered such hateful and disrespectful behavior on a forum. The worst I've encountered is that forum-moderators simply either prevent me from posting or delete my account.

"Ban me, ban me!" 
"No."

I've been away for a long while, yet you bozos started a thread (this very thread) and had a long discussion about (what you think is) me.

Actually, the discussion about you ended long ago.  Then Richard Brent showed up, which reopened the discussion; that ended fairly quickly.  Then you returned.

Anyway, there is really nothing to be said about this matter more than I have already said.

And yet, somehow, you manage to say more.  And more, and more.

Re: Introducing Jamie

My flesh is a weight and burden which I seek to slough off.

Not that I'd recommend it, but if he's serious about it then there's always the Netherlands

... or perhaps he's thinking more along the lines of Sheldon Cooper, and is looking for a robot to take over his bodily duties.

Re: Introducing Jamie

I've been away for a long while, yet you bozos started a thread (this very thread) and had a long discussion about (what you think is) me.

As a point of definition, a message thread on this board is started by a single individual. That Jamie considers it to have been started by a group lends further credence to this persecution complex he suffers from (or perhaps "relishes" would be more apt)

I (not a group) started this thread about two weeks after Jamie's first post. As I recall it was about the time Jamie had posted his "Jesus was an Anarchist" screed. I had recognized that piece from another message board I was on, and was curious as to whether he was doing it elsewhere as well - which, it turned out, he was. And doing it for an extended period of time (a dozen years or more). It's his modus operandi.

Beyond all that, though, my hypothesis in starting this thread was that Jamie was so monomaniacal about the self-gratification of his own threads that he probably wouldn't even notice this one - which, for ten months proved to be the case. I'm left wondering what event transpired that caused him to avert his eyes from his own woody long enough to see anything else (he does seem to have applied his Infinilast technique to his message topics).

Re: Introducing Jamie

So now that the party is over and I'm back to actually speak for myself, I'm a "tiresome person". Isn't that grand. Isn't that so convenient.

You posted a thread on being an expert sex partner. How is that NOT ripe for sarcasm? You might as well pour gasoline on yourself then get mad someone is flicking matches at you.

And you answer pretty much everything but cut and pasting the same quotes from your own works... in which you also quote yourself... or Tipler. Its laughable after a while even after its pointed out to you.

When I first got to this board I got spanked all the time. But as it turns out I WAS WRONG. And I routinely post wrong things here cause I want to see what the response is. I would think if you want your papers to be respected they should stand up to some scrutiny. If a low information person like me can pick apart your arguments then you serious have a flaw.

Re: Introducing Jamie

No. I have died many times over. I have died to myself.
My flesh is a weight and burden which I seek to slough off.

What I am attempting to prepare you for is mass-death. But also mass-life.
I am crying so hard right now because you hardheaded people have no concept of what is coming upon you.

Given that,  I think the focus is back on Messiah Complex as mentioned earlier in the thread. And as GDP mentioned

Christians sometime try to explain the above problem away by claiming that "In Order to Establish God's Glory," God often choses odd and unlikely messengers to "Prove that He can Accomplish His Will" in spite of the poor quality of His messengers, rather than because of of their exemplary quality.

In Jamie's case, he's assumed a personna that probably doesn't even appeal to most ardent Christians, much less those who don't accept the Christian message. And that of course adds even more to his persecution complex.

Beyond that though, one would think that he'd be exhibiting some embarrassment or shame at being incapable of convincing an audience to accept his transcription of the perfect message as had been handed to him by the perfect being. Yet all he does is exhibit pride at his own transcription despite his audience having shown fault with it.

Re: Introducing Jamie

Quote from: James Redford on November 08, 2014, 01:36:19 AM

I have never before encountered such hateful and disrespectful behavior on a forum. The worst I've encountered is that forum-moderators simply either prevent me from posting or delete my account.

"Ban me, ban me!" 
"No."

You speak as one who is inclined to such thoughts in response to veridical yet unorthodox belief.

Quote

I've been away for a long while, yet you bozos started a thread (this very thread) and had a long discussion about (what you think is) me.

Actually, the discussion about you ended long ago.  Then Richard Brent showed up, which reopened the discussion; that ended fairly quickly.  Then you returned.

And that holds what significance to you, exactly?

Whatever the series of transactions here, the point is that you clowns were still significantly interested in me, despite your above post's pretense to the contrary.

Quote

Anyway, there is really nothing to be said about this matter more than I have already said.

And yet, somehow, you manage to say more.  And more, and more.

And you are still very, very interested in what I say.

Re: Introducing Jamie

Quote from: James Redford on November 08, 2014, 01:36:19 AM

My flesh is a weight and burden which I seek to slough off.

Not that I'd recommend it, but if he's serious about it then there's always the Netherlands

... or perhaps he's thinking more along the lines of Sheldon Cooper, and is looking for a robot to take over his bodily duties.

Rather, we are gods, whether we be angels or demons.

If we be children of God (Romans 8:21, passim), then what does a child of God grow up to be?

Re: Introducing Jamie

And that holds what significance to you, exactly?

I'm the forum moderator.  Surely you had noticed that by now?

Re: Introducing Jamie

Quote from: James Redford on November 08, 2014, 01:36:19 AM

I've been away for a long while, yet you bozos started a thread (this very thread) and had a long discussion about (what you think is) me.

As a point of definition, a message thread on this board is started by a single individual. That Jamie considers it to have been started by a group lends further credence to this persecution complex he suffers from (or perhaps "relishes" would be more apt)

I (not a group) started this thread about two weeks after Jamie's first post. As I recall it was about the time Jamie had posted his "Jesus was an Anarchist" screed. I had recognized that piece from another message board I was on, and was curious as to whether he was doing it elsewhere as well - which, it turned out, he was. And doing it for an extended period of time (a dozen years or more). It's his modus operandi.

Beyond all that, though, my hypothesis in starting this thread was that Jamie was so monomaniacal about the self-gratification of his own threads that he probably wouldn't even notice this one - which, for ten months proved to be the case. I'm left wondering what event transpired that caused him to avert his eyes from his own woody long enough to see anything else (he does seem to have applied his Infinilast technique to his message topics).

As a point of fact, a thread can be started by more than one person. But beyond that simple fact, humans are finite and imperfect animals and hence communicate with imperfect shortcut language. Yet my meaning was not misunderstood by you. Yet you pretend ignorance of the fact that human animals communicate with shortcut language, and would have us pretend that it is somehow aberrant, when it is in fact common to all of us who are at a level capable of sapient communication.

If each of us were to actually take the time out of our lives to make our communications truly exact without using such shortcuts then we would find that we spend most of our time attempting to impart meaning to another meanwhile the other person has to break themself off in order to attend to the activity of gathering the resources of feeding themself.

Yet still, Bitjuggler, you are among a confederacy of dunces. So don't feel so bad, as you are not alone. Perdition is not without its adherents.