Non-denial of the fact of evolution can co-exist with religious beliefs, sure. To be clear, nothing I've said in this thread has been about the validity of religious belief in general or belief in any gods.

But "Creationism" is not just the idea/belief that a supernatural creator set the universe in motion or created the first living organism and let it evolve from there. "Creationism" is the idea that the earth, the heavens, and the separate species or, at least, groups/families of species were created in separate acts of creation in something like their present forms. That includes both Young-Earth (6000-10,000ya) and Old-Earth versions of Creationism.

So, no, Creationism is not at all compatible with evolution, nor with several other facts about the world and the universe, from fields such as geology and astronomy.

The article you linked to is unsourced, with no references. At best, it has sections that are merely useless, just general claims about what some people's religious beliefs are. But many sections mislead with false distinctions like "microevolution" vs "macroevolution". And many sections outright make false statements about what evolution is, claiming that it violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics - a claim so outrageous but so common among a certain set of Fundamentalist religious apologists that it is a clear indication that anyone making it either has no understanding of the Second Law of Thermodynamics or is just a liar.
The chart at the end of the article where every tenet of Creationism is listed as "observable" and every alleged tenet of evolution is listed as "unobservable" is particularly risible.