全ての 17 コメント

[–]PhilosoGuidoConstitutionalist 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Classic Fauxcahontas.

[–]Festigio 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (2子コメント)

[–]chabanaisSi vis pacem, para bellum.[S] 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (1子コメント)

She herself, according to the linked article, stated her house was worth up to $5 million. Clearly she knows she's wealthy even if she lies about it.

Her financial disclosure form (linked below) shows annual income from Harvard at $429,000 per year. This is from 2011.

Zillow shows it is now worth $2.4 million.

So, when taken in whole, she is not someone to be attacking the system as being "rigged" for the rich, of which she definitely is a part.

“I realize there are some wealthy individuals – I’m not one of them, but some wealthy individuals who have a lot of stock portfolios” - Elizabeth Warren

http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/27/multimillionaire-elizabeth-warren-im-not-wealthy/

[–]Lamehandle 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

So, when taken in whole, she is not someone to be attacking the system as being "rigged" for the rich, of which she definitely is a part.

Why? Why should only poor people fight against a system that benefits the rich. A rich person would be the best to fight against it because they have the resources and/or power to do something about it.

It only makes sense if you have a "F.. you I got mine" mentality.

[–]Gstreetshit 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (8子コメント)

You got any sauce on this? I'm not saying you are a liar, I just want the actual source to shut up socialist,

[–]BitcoinFinanceNeoconservative 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (6子コメント)

I looked it up. Her house is worth 2.4 million. Net worth of 3.6 million. Her dubious claims to Native American Heritage.

[–]bryanlharris 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

"They're always overestimating!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0w-Stj-sz8w

[–]chabanaisSi vis pacem, para bellum.[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

She said it was worth up to $5 million.

[–]BitcoinFinanceNeoconservative 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

She's definitely a hypocrite.

[–]Bart10Hurr Durr 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

She didn't even buy it for that price either. She bought it for $447k in 1995. The value went up because of its location.

Politifact only covers the part about the mansion. Snopes covers the other claim.

[–]BitcoinFinanceNeoconservative 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Who cares what she bought it at. Warren Buffett bought shares of Geico at $42 a share.

[–]baldyloxRight Social Libertarian 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Google. It's out there.

It's a very well-known fact that Princess Running Bullshit lied about being Cherokee to gain employment at Harvard.

If you're arguing with a Socialist about it, save your breath. They're already a lost cause. You'd have better luck coming over to my farm and arguing with a chicken. All of the proof in the world isn't going to convince the willfully ignorant.

[–]rff3201Rockefeller Republican 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (3子コメント)

She's 1/32nd Cherokee. I find it ridiculous that Harvard placed her into the category of minority professors and she somehow didn't notice. It's also suspicious that her native status disappeared once she got tenure.

[–]pumpyourstillskin 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

No, she might be 1/32nd Cherokee. She claims her great great great grandmother had an affair with an Indian, though there's no real proof.

[–]western_red 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

In many tribes, you can actually become a tribal member being 1/32. It is still stupid to claim her as native american though, being she has no affiliation with the Cherokee Nation.

[–]itsmeok -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Searching the Ole inter webs doesn't find this. Seems it is up to the tribe and most have stopped allowing new registrations. Fed government looks like 1/8 for things like scholarships. Claim NO expertise beyond the last 3 min on Google.

[–]ManOfTheInBetweenConservative -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

She looks ridiculous in that attire.