* Men who don’t respect consent don’t have a special right to keep that private.
* Men who threaten violence against women don’t have a special right to keep that private.
* Men who disregard a woman’s sexual agency to objectify her don’t have a special right to keep that private.
* Men who abuse women don’t have a special right to keep that private.
Hey, Good job erasing Male Abuse victims and basically saying Women are never the abuser. Fuck you.
You mean, like how I erased the 1986 World Series, Ursula La Guin’s “The Left Hand of Darkness”, and Salt Block cooking, too? On account of those were all things I didn’t bring up because they WEREN’T THE TOPIC AT HAND?
Tell me, do you go to math class and scream at the teacher for “erasing” biology or civics? Or, do you just adopt this conveniently non-sensical definition or “erasure” when it is YOU who want to erase views that you don’t want discussed? By making outlandish claims that someone has “basically” said women are never abusers because they were talking about specifically about male abusers? Which doesn’t “basically” say anything you seem to think it does.
But, you know that. You are being disingenuous for the sake of “scoring points”. You’ve appropriated language about erasing abuse victims not because you actually have any concern about men who’ve suffered abuse. Indeed, its the opposite. You don’t care about them at all which is why you use the specter of male abuse victims as some kind of pawn in your game of trying to “prove” how oppressed you are by “misandry”. I was talking about something else, but you brought up male abuse victims explicitly to devalue and demean them.
I mean, basically.