7
8

Vaccines and “herd immunity” nonsense (self.conspiracy)

axolotl_peyotl が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
ベスト
トップ
新着
注目
論争中
古い順
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]Ambiguously_Ironic 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (11子コメント)

It's absurd looking at the votes these posts have been getting. Can't something be done about this? Are the admins of this site aware of the vote manipulation that's going on here? (...little joke)

[–]axolotl_peyotl[S] 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (4子コメント)

It's the lovely folks at /r/vaccinemyths.

This thread was linked by JF_Queeny and is currently #1 in the sub.

This post actually reached #15 in /r/conspiracy, but after JF_Queeny xposted it, magically it dropped sharply. Go figure.

[–]ct_warlock 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (3子コメント)

I've just gone and checked and wow!, that subreddit has a whole 657 readers!

[–]Ambiguously_Ironic 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (2子コメント)

And if even 5 of them downvote a post in the new queue right after it's posted, the odds of it ever reaching the front page of the sub are minimal at best.

[–]ct_warlock 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I thought most people browsed in /r/conspiracy/new anyway?

If not, they really should.

[–]Ambiguously_Ironic -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I agree but most people just look at their reddit front page, meaning they only ever see if and when a post from this sub makes it to the #1 spot. Of those who actually visit the sub specifically, most probably just look at "hot" or "top". It wouldn't take many people to significantly influence the flow of information, especially for a post like this which has clearly been cross posted to a sub dedicated to discrediting posts like this.

[–]shadowofashadow 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (4子コメント)

I noticed axolotl was getting hit pretty hard the past day or two. In another topic with only 10 or so comments he made a pretty benign post. Every other post was positive and his was at -7!

[–]Ambiguously_Ironic 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Haha yeah he seems to have a little crew following him around. You can almost see them in action in real time.

[–]axolotl_peyotl[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Check out these two folks with highly upvoted comments in this thread.

One never posts to /r/conspiracy, and the other is a /r/conspiratard.

[–]HeLMeT_Ne 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I assume I am the one you are talking about as the conspiratard since you pointed it out earlier. Just to clarify, I have made one post and three comments in that sub since I joined reddit. I have about 30 times the karma on this sub as I do on that. I did not downvote you on this submission as I believe in the rule that downvotes are not the disagree button, and I have been and still am in favor of making this a subscriber only sub due to the brigading that often happens to your posts as well as many others.

I will continue to be a skeptic who looks for sources in the field for which the claims are made, which is why I made my original comment in this thread. I was simply pointing out what I felt should be known about one of the sources you used as I do not find him to be credible on the subject. It is up to the other readers to decide if my point was valid. If you don't like having your sources so easily discredited, I suggest finding better ones to use.

[–]axolotl_peyotl[S] 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

They're my internet lovers.

[–]vpnusers 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I just up voted you wink