4
5

Vaccines and “herd immunity” nonsense (self.conspiracy)

axolotl_peyotl が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
ベスト
トップ
新着
注目
論争中
古い順
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]KingDoink 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (11子コメント)

I thank you for posting, because I do like reading the opinions opposing my own. First though Jon Rappoport is not creditable. A quick Google search shows him as a loon. Secondly your own research isn't credible. What are your qualifications to make you credible? Your Australian study is behind a pay wall.

While your post was an interesting read I do think everyone should take it with a gain of salt at the very least.

[–]axolotl_peyotl[S] 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (3子コメント)

I see you've never posted in /r/conspiracy before this comment.

May I ask how you came across this post?

[–]peterson2004 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

He used this service, which quickly alerts the user/army the second anything on reddit appears with certain words.

[–]xanaxinator 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Wow, thanks for that!

No wonder they can act so fast!

[–]KingDoink 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I generally just lurk here. I just decided to comment hoping to see more credible post. As I stated I like to read opinions that oppose my own, and have no problem changing my stance in light of real evidence.

[–]HeLMeT_Ne 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Another note on credibility - Peter Doshi is neither a virologist nor a epidemiologist, but rather an anthropologist who completed a fellowship in comparative effectiveness research at Johns Hopkins. He conducted no research about influenza or vaccines at Johns Hopkins, nor does he speak for the university on that subject.

[–]axolotl_peyotl[S] -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (1子コメント)

So you're a contributor to /r/conspiratard and rarely post at /r/conspiracy...

What brings you to this thread?

[–]HeLMeT_Ne 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I have a pretty long history of posting here - I don't have as many comments as links posted. Apparently you have checked my history if you say that I am a contributor over there, so you should know this. I may at some point have contributed to /r/conspiratard, but generally I read the comments only. I believe this sub plays an important role in creating awareness of some issues, but I also believe that some of the more outlandish theories are crazy and should be treated as such.

Regardless, it makes my comment no less valid.

[–]peterson2004 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Look at this anonymous vaccine evangelist preaching about credibility on the Internet.

What makes you credible? How credible is the pharmacy industry as a whole? When's the last time any disease was cured?

[–]xanaxinator 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Please answer:

When is the last time any disease was cured?

[–]KingDoink 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I'm don't hold anything that would give me any credibility in this subject matter. So I didn't post my own research that would dispute his. If I wasn't mobile currently, or at the time of my post, I may have linked more credible sources.

There is nothing wrong with enjoying a good conspiracy, but before you preach it, have some actually evidence. Is that too complicated? Or should I just start making stuff up that goes against the masses?

Edit: Word