あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]axolotl_peyotl[S] -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Here come the downvotes...can't have this stay on the front page of /r/conspiracy eh?

How about you negative nancies actually speak up?

[–]dtiftw 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (3子コメント)

KingDoink did. You ignored the substance of his comment, choosing to go through his posting history.

Are you willing to debate this topic, or are you going to dismiss all criticisms of your position out of hand?

[–]SovereignMan -5 ポイント-4 ポイント  (2子コメント)

KingDoink did. You ignored the substance of his comment

Lol. You call this "substance"?

Jon Rappoport is not creditable... shows him as a loon... your own research isn't credible

There's absolutely nothing of substance there, just character assassination.

[–]dtiftw 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Is Rappoport credible? I don't see any reason to take him as such. So at the very least, axolotl could have provided just a little reason to consider him an authority in this field.

edit: I found a blurb about one of Rappoport's books:

The more you are able to do magic because magic flows from the uniqueness of you the more magic you will be able to do. That's what it is all about. And so, in the New Magic Age as energy and the anticipation of this age begins to bleed into the atmosphere of our planet, it is an invitation for each individual to set foot on that infinite road of magic.

This doesn't seem like a person who has a strong background in science.

[–]SovereignMan -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

My point was that KingDoink simply saying so doesn't make it so and neither does him saying so have any substance.