ABOUT TOM WOODS
Find us on Facebook
-
Thanks for having me on the show @ThomasEWoods to talk about the urgency of #entrepreneurship in the 21st century http://bit.ly/1xcA1Ys
Retweeted by Thomas Woods -
@JakeJacobs1776 Your Hillary Clinton version of history is tiresome.
-
@JakeJacobs1776 Totally irrelevant! You are a terrible historian. Who cares what motives others attributed to him?
-
@JakeJacobs1776 You are so stuck in Straussian neoconservatism that you can't distinguish between secession and the war. Break free, man.
-
@JakeJacobs1776 Not the issue for Lincoln. You are being dishonest. You can read, can't you?
-
On my show, @MichaelMalice argues that a Hillary presidency would be good for liberty; lively discussion follows http://tomwoods.com/blog/should-libertarians-favor-a-hillary-presidency/#.VGBHu8UB4KU.twitter …
-
I emailed http://libertyclassroom.com and got a personal reply from @ThomasEWoods. Classy guy. Never deleting! Lol.
Retweeted by Thomas Woods -
Funniest headline involving me I can remember: Cold Enchilada Incident Delays Tom Woods Response http://www.targetliberty.com/2014/11/cold-enchilada-incident-delays-tom.html?spref=tw …
-
@JakeJacobs1776 Ooooh, an "established government"! Now that doesn't beg every relevant moral question, does it?
-
@roeeorland What if free TVs started falling from heaven? Should we indignantly reject this gift?
-
@roeeorland You'd prefer a machine masseuse, a machine gardener? You're kind of odd, then.
-
@roeeorland I did a whole episode on "the robots are 'taking our jobs'" http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=M60UVXlkbn8 …
-
@roeeorland I reject whole premise of "job creation." Implicitly denies entrepreneurship.
-
@praiseglycon Have tried to get a guest on this without success.
-
@zicatanka @rahulvarshney @MaartendeVries2 @mises @lewrockwell My check must have gotten lost in the mail.
-
@roeeorland As long as each of us can conceive of something that two people could do for us, always more work then can ever be done.
-
@roeeorland Have you not been observing the world for past 300 years?
-
@JakeJacobs1776 I don't deny that. I certainly wouldn't use p.c., loaded term "rebel" rather than "secede."
-
PODCAST: @ThomasEWoods on his new book “Real Dissent: A Libertarian Sets Fire to the Index Card of Allowable Opinion” http://www.mattklewis.com/?p=7914
Retweeted by Thomas Woods -
Francis purge at Congregation for Worship; new liturgy still not quite clownish enough for leftists http://eponymousflower.blogspot.com/2014/11/bugnini-man-appointed-to-congregation.html?m=1 …
There are no more Tweets in this stream.
The Tom Woods App
St. Thomas Aquinas and the Existence of God
Around The Web
Also on Tom Woods | The official website for author Tom Woods
-
Chris • 13 days ago see moreI'm ashamed to admit that I was one of the obnoxious atheists you referred to in the beginning of the show. I left a snide comment on your blog in the summer of 2013, and you shot me down easily with Aquinas' arguments which I had never heard of before—the only arguments I had previously heard from theists were something like "because I have faith" or "because the bible says so", but admittedly I never sought out any real arguments because I am rarely confronted by theism, living in a largely atheist country in Europe. I cringe every time I think of how insulting my comment was, and I would like to offer an apology. I am still an atheist, but a far more humble one, thanks to you. -
Vee Voluntary • 13 days ago see moreThis is the first logical explanation I have ever heard of for the existence of God. I went to 8 years of Catholic school as a kid and the experience made me an atheist. I have been an agnostic for a long time, but after listening to this podcast, I might change my mind. Thanks. -
James Redford • 7 minutes ago see moreInterestingly, God has been proven to exist based upon the most reserved view of the known laws of physics. For much more on that, see my below article, which details physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology and the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model Theory of Everything (TOE) correctly describing and unifying all the forces in physics. The Omega Point cosmology demonstrates that the known laws of physics (viz., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics) require that the universe end in the Omega Point: the final cosmological singularity and state of infinite informational capacity having all the unique properties traditionally claimed for God, and of which is a different aspect of the Big Bang initial singularity, i.e., the first cause. The Omega Point cosmology has been published and extensively peer-reviewed in leading physics journals.James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708, https://archive.org/details/Th... , http://theophysics.host56.com/... .Additionally, in the below resource are six sections which contain very informative videos of Prof. Tipler explaining the Omega Point cosmology and the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model TOE. The seventh section therein contains an audio interview of Tipler. I also provide some helpful notes and commentary for some of these videos.James Redford, "Video of Profs. Frank Tipler and Lawrence Krauss's Debate at Caltech: Can Physics Prove God and Christianity?", alt.sci.astro, Message-ID: jghev8tcbv02b6vn3uiq8jmelp7jijluqk[at sign]4ax[period]com , July 30, 2013, https://groups.google.com/foru... , http://archive.today/a04w9 . -
-
Steffen • 13 days ago see moreI have one question about a thing, I did not understand. Maybe someone can help me out with this. It is clear, that god can't be perfectly good and perfectly bad at the same time, just as the egg, tom mentioned, can' be hot and cold at the same time. But why should we define badness as a lack of goodness (or cold as a lack of warmth) and not the other way around? To understand what I mean, maybe think about Goethe's attempt to show, that darkness is not a lack of light, but light a lack of darkness.-
Alexander Paulsen > Steffen • 13 days ago see moreI think what he was trying to say was the good an devil are not things per-se, evil is a lack of goodness like blindness is a lack of sight. Cold is a lack of heat energy - hot is just a generous supply of heat. hot and cold are relative to each other and not absolute things.-
Steffen > Alexander Paulsen • 13 days ago see moreIf you imagine a continuum between the poles goodness (g) and evil (e), the question is: why should g be the final stop? Chris and I already mentioned that you can think of it the other way around. But not only that. You can take every single point between g and e and do the same thing. Let's say there is a point x somewhere between g and e, why shouldn't god be
perfectly x instead of being perfectly g? After all god would have a potentiality to become x, if he where located on g. You can do that with every point on the continuum and get a negative definition of it. Why should we see g as a superior point to any other, if every state lacks something to be be any other state? -
Chris > Alexander Paulsen • 13 days ago see moreI could just as easily define goodness as a lack of evil.
-
-
-
Andy • 14 days ago see moreGreat resource Tom. Trent Horn has a good resource page I've used for better defending/arguing that there are good reasons to believe in the existence of God. -
BLOGROLL
UPCOMING EVENTS
Latest Events-
Wichita, KS
-
Houston, TX
