Here's an example from a new sissy .... ~grinz~

http://eroticaudios.com/content/Olivia/ ... outMen.mp3

So....I know it's super hard to type in long nails (~laughs~) but get typing ladies.....I want to hear everything!
Ms Olivia

_________________
My tumblr: http://phonesexmistressolivia.tumblr.com/

Ready for the ultimate....Dial, 1-800-601-7259 for Olivia

http://www.experiencedmistress.com
for the GIRLS: http://crossdressersphonesex.com

$2.50/min., 10 min minimum, billed to your credit card.

Well, I'm already out in public, but I have a fantasy. It involves a woman and I going to the salon and spending the day getting our nails and hair done nice and pretty. Then, we get dressed up and go grab a bite and hit the club. The night could go any number of ways. We could pick up guys, maybe give a couple blowjobs for drinks. Or, we bring some guys back home and have all sorts of naughty fun. Afterwards, it's she and I in bed, and of course I'm doing clean up and we cuddle and sleep together. That ranks up there on my list of fantasies on a few levels. I've never had the full salon experience as it is, so even just that, grabbing a bite and speeding the evening with a woman would be nice too. I'm okay with following her lead, so if she wants to go out, I'm up for that too. Who knows where the night would go from there...

_________________
I'm working on the House Of Feminization blog that I hope can be of help to CD's/Sissies/T-Girls and women who want to understand them. This is just the beginning of a bigger project.

You do know your sissies Ms Olivia. I have a feeling I would melt to my knees in front of you and be doing the most unspeakable things while you laughed and teased me. And the worst part is that I would do everything I could to provoke you to continue even if I was being reduced to tears. It sounds like you know exactly what you're doing and you are very good at it.

_________________
'Just being able to dream it opens a whole new world of excitement'

MS OLIVIA

Likely in a very small minority here, but my fantasies have to do with Female Supremacy on a larger than personal scale. Mostly find interest in Sex-Role Reversal that even touches upon a total societal landscape. Humiliation, feminization and taunting of males on a generic level are integral. The fantasies would have general power exchange between female and male with concomitant glee for the Female and chagrin for the male. Also these scenarios are absolutely void of male-male activity (Just never floats my boat... actually sinks all interest), whereas occasional Female-Female bonding as a means of minimalizing male importance does add a further element of titillating humiliation.

For a while back, i even wrote scripts on a fantasy future role-reversed relationship that MS TARA seemed to truly enjoy and recorded 8-9 parts here. Again Tara sadly is among us no more, and so the story like Schubert's work, i suppose shall remain forever unfinished.

Just as well, the years take their toll on memory and skills....

Ohhhhh why-guys ..... you might think you're in a small minority here but let me tell you....there's a bit of EVERYTHING! ~grinz~ I personally adore the diversity. It's very sexy to me. I know a bunch of people (me included) who have a great time with Female Supremacy and would have a very good time with your scene! ~smiles~

_________________
My tumblr: http://phonesexmistressolivia.tumblr.com/

Ready for the ultimate....Dial, 1-800-601-7259 for Olivia

http://www.experiencedmistress.com
for the GIRLS: http://crossdressersphonesex.com

$2.50/min., 10 min minimum, billed to your credit card.

Hi, Ms. Olivia.

One thing that I have noticed about my own sexuality is that I think about studly men pretty much all the time when I am in a sexual mood.

I at one time thought I was straight, but that was when I was struggling with my feminine desires.

I eventually realized that no matter how hard I try, I can't actually be a butch male.

Sure, I can pretend to be butch, like I used to do, but in the end, I'm not actually a butch guy.

Growing up, I often had "gay" thoughts, but I pushed those thoughts out of my mind, because I thought it was wrong to have such thoughts. That is, I thought *I* was wrong. So I told myself that those thoughts about studly, potent men weren't really my actual desires, but rather just arrant thoughts that entered my mind.

But from the moment I wake up nowadays, I fantasize about big, throbbing, veiny penises ejaculating huge loads of semen up my ass and down my throat.

Yet that's just the purely sexual aspect of my desires, because when one really drills deep-down, what I really long for is a nice husband.

I want a strong man to hold me in his big arms and make me feel secure. When a man is using my bottom for his masculine desires, I want that too, just so long as I know that he is my man.

And I know quite well that I'm not a total woman, as I don't pretend to be other than what I am.

I realize that I am a genetic male who has a male sex-drive, but a sex-drive that is focused upon feminine desires.

So I don't pretend that I am "all woman", since I know that a genetic woman's experience is quite different from my own experience, even if we should sometimes have similar thoughts about masculine men.

Of course, there are feminine males who do feel like a total woman, and I wish them all the best.

----------

Anyway, it's rather funny living my life as an openly feminine gay male.

Growing up, I didn't think that this is how I'd turn out. When I was growing up, the worst possible thing a boy could be was to be a faggot. I mean, any sort of faggot; but a feminine faggot was all the worse.

I'm not joking when I say that. I mean that literally. I mean that it would be better that a boy be found out to have severed rotted skulls in his closet than people find out that he is gay, particularly if he is femininely gay.

So I suppose that things are changing somewhat. It feels like things are changing.

But despite some good advances, truly horrific times are coming up.

The reason horrific times are coming upon mankind is because we as a species are converting from a dying race to an immortal race.

However, those who rule over us already know that this event is going to occur.

Therein lies all the trouble. Utterly horrific trouble, as it will occur.

For the details on that, see physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology, which is a proof (i.e., mathematical theorem) of God's existence per the known laws of physics (viz., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics), and the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model Theory of Everything (TOE), which is also required by said known physical laws. The Omega Point cosmology has been published and extensively peer-reviewed in leading physics journals.

James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708; PDF, 1741424 bytes, MD5: 8f7b21ee1e236fc2fbb22b4ee4bbd4cb, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1974708 , http://archive.org/download/ThePhysicsO ... of-God.pdf , http://theophysics.host56.com/Redford-P ... of-God.pdf , http://alphaomegapoint.files.wordpress. ... of-god.pdf , http://sites.google.com/site/physicothe ... of-God.pdf .

Additionally, in the below resource are six sections which contain very informative videos of Prof. Tipler explaining the Omega Point cosmology and the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model TOE. The seventh section therein contains an audio interview of Tipler. I also provide some helpful notes and commentary for some of these videos.

James Redford, "Video of Profs. Frank Tipler and Lawrence Krauss's Debate at Caltech: Can Physics Prove God and Christianity?", alt.sci.astro, Message-ID: jghev8tcbv02b6vn3uiq8jmelp7jijluqk@4ax.com , 30 Jul 2013 00:51:55 -0400, https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic ... QWt4KcpMVo , http://archive.today/a04w9 , http://webcitation.org/6IUTAMEyS . The plain text of this post is available at: TXT, 42423 bytes, MD5: b199e867e42d54b2b8bf6adcb4127761, http://mirrorcreator.com/files/JCFTZSS8/ , http://ge.tt/3lOTVbp .

_________________
Boys will be girls.



Author (under my legal name) of "Jesus Is an Anarchist", December 4, 2011 http://ssrn.com/abstract=1337761

Theophysics http://theophysics.host56.com , http://theophysics.ifastnet.com

So, how is it bad that we're gonna live forever.

Is this about Reptiles again?
Cuz you're totally wasting energy on those false conspiracy theories.

Come again? "Reptiles"?

No need for "Reptiles", my dear Dolly Buster. Human beings are quite capable on their own of inflicting mass-horrors upon other human beings. For just some of the history of that, see my above-cited "Physics of God" article, particularly Subsec. 8.2: "Ponerology Vis-à-Vis Politics", Subsubsec. 8.2.1: "The Beast", pp. 63 ff.

In answer to your first question:

In addition to explaining how the known physical laws require the universe to diverge to infinite computational power and intelligence, said article further provides an examination of the globalist political power-elite: history is given on their organizational structure and their methods of accumulating power; and analysis is given on where they're attempting to take the world, i.e., their self-termed New World Order world government and world religion.

The article furnishes documentation on what the globalist oligarchy's ultimate goal is. This ultimate goal of theirs most popularly goes by the name of transhumanism: immortality through technology. However, I explain in the article that the coming radical life-extension technologies create a fundamental dilemma for the oligarchs, which is why they must dominate world society before such technology becomes a reality. The details of that dilemma are explained in Sec. 8.2.2: "The Mark of the Beast" of the article.

Thus, this article explains to people what is to occur and why it is to occur, so that they will not be in ignorance as to the events that are to unfold.

_________________
Boys will be girls.



Author (under my legal name) of "Jesus Is an Anarchist", December 4, 2011 http://ssrn.com/abstract=1337761

Theophysics http://theophysics.host56.com , http://theophysics.ifastnet.com

Look, the term globalist is not offensive to me at all. It refers to the globe.

I actually enjoy breaking boundaries, I'm against individual countries having their own government.

So we should just allow globalization and World Government to take hold.

The problem with that is that there would then be no separate countries in which to seek refuge from a tyrannical government.

The most egregious perpetrators of murderously brutal conspiracies are governments upon their own innocent citizens. More than six times the amount of noncombatants have been systematically murdered for purely ideological reasons by their own governments within the past century than were killed in that same timespan from wars. From 1900 to 1923, various Turkish regimes murdered from 3.5 million to over 4.3 million of its own Armenians, Greeks, Nestorians, and other Christians. The Soviet government murdered over 61 million of its own noncombatant subjects. The communist Chinese government murdered over 76 million of it own subjects. The National Socialist German government murdered some 16 million of it own subjects. And that's only a sampling of governments mass-murdering their own noncombatant subjects within the past century. (The preceding figures are from Prof. Rudolph Joseph Rummel's University of Hawaii website at http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/welcome.html .)

What one should instead seek is decentralization of power: of reducing the political unit down to the individual; of making the individual a sovereign over their own body and justly-acquired property. For much more on that, below are vital articles concerning the nature of government, of liberty, and the free-market production of defense:

Prof. Murray N. Rothbard, "The Anatomy of the State", Rampart Journal of Individualist Thought, Vol. 1, No. 2 (Summer 1965), pp. 1-24. Reprinted in a collection of some of Rothbard's articles, Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature and Other Essays (Washington, DC: Libertarian Review Press, 1974). http://mises.org/easaran/chap3.asp , http://mises.org/books/egalitarianism.pdf , http://webcitation.org/5ve3r05ti

Murray N. Rothbard, "Defense Services on the Free Market", Chapter 1 from Power and Market: Government and the Economy (Kansas City: Sheed Andrews and McMeel, Inc., 1977; orig. pub. 1970). http://wayback.archive.org/web/20040720 ... market.pdf , http://webcitation.org/5ve3w5w9a , http://pdf-archive.com/2013/08/28/rothb ... market.pdf

Prof. Hans-Hermann Hoppe, "The Private Production of Defense", Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. 14, No. 1 (Winter 1998-1999), pp. 27-52. http://mises.org/journals/jls/14_1/14_1_2.pdf , http://webcitation.org/5ve41VasQ

Hans-Hermann Hoppe, "Fallacies of the Public Goods Theory and the Production of Security", Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. 9, No. 1 (Winter 1989), pp. 27-46. http://mises.org/journals/jls/9_1/9_1_2.pdf , http://webcitation.org/5ve485kNf

Prof. David D. Friedman, "Police, Courts, and Laws--On the Market", Chapter 29 from The Machinery of Freedom: Guide to a Radical Capitalism (La Salle, Ill.: Open Court Publishing Co., 1989; orig. pub. 1971). http://daviddfriedman.com/Libertarian/M ... er_29.html , http://webcitation.org/5ve4A6KFZ , http://archive.is/I1mt4

Concerning the ethics of human rights, the below book is the best book on the subject:

Murray N. Rothbard , The Ethics of Liberty (New York, NY: New York University Press, 1998; orig. pub. 1982). http://mises.org/rothbard/ethics/ethics.asp , http://mises.org/rothbard/ethics.pdf , http://webcitation.org/5ve4GO9l5

If one desires a solid grounding in economics then one can do no better than with the below texts:

Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Economic Science and the Austrian Method (Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 1995). http://mises.org/esandtam.asp , http://mises.org/books/esam.pdf , http://webcitation.org/63rQDYtj2

The above small book by Prof. Hoppe doesn't delve into political theory, but only concerns the methodological basis of economics (i.e., the epistemology of economics). I would recommend that everyone read this short book *first* if they're at all interested in economics. There exists much confusion as to what economics is and what it is not. This book is truly great in elucidating the nature of economics and its epistemic basis. If one were to read no other texts on economics, then this ought to be the economic text that one reads. Plus it doesn't take all that long to read it.

Murray N. Rothbard, "Toward a Reconstruction of Utility and Welfare Economics", in Mary Sennholz (editor), On Freedom and Free Enterprise: The Economics of Free Enterprise (Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand, 1956), pp. 224-262. Reprinted in Murray N. Rothbard, The Logic of Action One: Method, Money, and the Austrian School (London, UK: Edward Elgar, 1997), pp. 211-255. http://mises.org/rothbard/toward.pdf , http://webcitation.org/5ve4WQnYm

Murray N. Rothbard, Man, Economy, and State (Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2nd ed., 2004; orig. pub. 1962). http://mises.org/rothbard/mes.asp , http://mises.org/books/mespm.pdf , http://webcitation.org/5v3cOaaAG

Murray N. Rothbard, Power and Market: Government and the Economy (Kansas City: Sheed Andrews and McMeel, Inc., 1977; orig. pub. 1970). http://wayback.archive.org/web/20040720 ... market.pdf , http://webcitation.org/5ve3w5w9a , http://pdf-archive.com/2013/08/28/rothb ... market.pdf

These texts ought to be read in the order listed above. I would also add to the above list the below book:

Murray N. Rothbard, America's Great Depression (Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 5th ed., 2000; orig. pub. 1963). http://mises.org/rothbard/agd.pdf , http://webcitation.org/5v3cWFPsd

The above book concerns how governments create depressions (i.e., panics; recessions) through credit expansion (i.e., fractional-reserve banking and/or fiat money).

On the matter of politics in relation to God, see my below article, which demonstrates the logically unavoidable anarchism of Jesus Christ's teachings as recorded in the New Testament (in addition to analyzing their context in relation to his actions, to the Tanakh, and to his apostles). It is logically complete on this subject, in the sense of its apodixis.

James Redford, "Jesus Is an Anarchist", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Dec. 4, 2011 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2001), doi:10.2139/ssrn.1337761. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1337761 , http://archive.org/details/JesusIsAnAnarchist , http://theophysics.host56.com/anarchist-jesus.pdf , http://webcitation.org/66AIz2rJw

See also my below article, which demonstrates the logically unavoidable correctness of the anarcho-capitalist theory of human rights. It doesn't derive an "ought" from an "is"--rather, it derives an "ought" from an "ought": an "ought" everyone must necessarily presuppose in order to even begin to deny it.

James Redford, "Libertarian Anarchism Is Apodictically Correct", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Dec. 15, 2011, doi:10.2139/ssrn.1972733. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1972733 , http://archive.org/details/LibertarianA ... llyCorrect , http://theophysics.host56.com/Redford-A ... ianism.pdf , http://webcitation.org/63xyCLjLm

For how physics allows unlimited progress by civilizations--to literally infinite intelligence and power--see my following article on physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology, which is a proof (i.e., mathematical theorem) of God's existence per the known laws of physics (viz., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics), and the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model Theory of Everything (TOE), which is also required by said known physical laws. The Omega Point cosmology has been published and extensively peer-reviewed in leading physics journals.

James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1974708 , http://archive.org/details/ThePhysicsOf ... Everything , http://theophysics.host56.com/Redford-P ... of-God.pdf , http://alphaomegapoint.files.wordpress. ... of-god.pdf , http://sites.google.com/site/physicothe ... of-God.pdf

Additionally, in the below resource are six sections which contain very informative videos of Prof. Tipler explaining the Omega Point cosmology and the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model TOE. The seventh section therein contains an audio interview of Tipler.

A number of these videos are not otherwise online. I also provide some helpful notes and commentary for some of these videos.

James Redford, "Video of Profs. Frank Tipler and Lawrence Krauss's Debate at Caltech: Can Physics Prove God and Christianity?", alt.sci.astro, Message-ID: jghev8tcbv02b6vn3uiq8jmelp7jijluqk@4ax.com , 30 Jul 2013 00:51:55 -0400. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic ... QWt4KcpMVo , http://archive.is/a04w9 , http://webcitation.org/6IUTAMEyS The plain text of this post is available at: TXT, 42423 bytes, MD5: b199e867e42d54b2b8bf6adcb4127761. http://mirrorcreator.com/files/JCFTZSS8/ , http://ge.tt/3lOTVbp

_________________
Boys will be girls.



Author (under my legal name) of "Jesus Is an Anarchist", December 4, 2011 http://ssrn.com/abstract=1337761

Theophysics http://theophysics.host56.com , http://theophysics.ifastnet.com